Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2010

01.11.2010 | Original Article

Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump

verfasst von: Lars Ivo Partecke, Wolfram Kessler, Wolfram von Bernstorff, Stephan Diedrich, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Maciej Patrzyk

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of the closure of the appendicular stump with a single non-absorbable polymeric clip compared with the closure of the appendicular stump with a stapler.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2009, 82 patients, 31 males and 51 females (mean age of 35.4 years; range of 17 to 79 years), were included in this prospective, non-randomized trial. In 56 patients, the appendicular stump was closed by staplers, and in 26 patients, a single Hem-o-lok MLX polymeric clip was applied. The data collected included age, sex, time of surgery, costs, time of hospitalization, day-time of surgery, complications, and preoperative white blood count (WBC) and c-reactive protein (CRP).

Results

There were no differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, WBC, CRP, and time of hospitalization. Time of surgery was longer in the clip group due to the introductory phase. Morbidity did not differ significantly and was highly acceptable in both groups. The costs of one set of Hem-o-lock clips were negligible compared to staplers (19.94 € versus 356.43 €).

Conclusions

The use of a single non-absorbable polymeric clip is easy to use even for surgical trainees; it is safe and cost-effective. We suggest the use of a single clip for the closure of the appendicular stump as the standard procedure in laparoscopic appendectomy whenever possible.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardin DM Jr (1999) Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician 60:2027–2034PubMed Hardin DM Jr (1999) Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician 60:2027–2034PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20:17–20, discussion 21CrossRefPubMed Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20:17–20, discussion 21CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Bakka A, Andersen OK, Larsen S, Rosseland AR (1994) Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 18:411–415, discussion 415–416CrossRefPubMed Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Bakka A, Andersen OK, Larsen S, Rosseland AR (1994) Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 18:411–415, discussion 415–416CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:950–954PubMed Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:950–954PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Partecke LI, von Bernstorff W, Karrasch A, Cziupka K, Glitsch A, Stier A, Heidecke CD, Tepel J (2009) Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis: a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg (Epub ahead of print) Partecke LI, von Bernstorff W, Karrasch A, Cziupka K, Glitsch A, Stier A, Heidecke CD, Tepel J (2009) Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis: a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg (Epub ahead of print)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanssen A, Plotnikov S, Dubois R (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. JSLS 11:59–62PubMed Hanssen A, Plotnikov S, Dubois R (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. JSLS 11:59–62PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Delibegovic S, Matovic E (2009) Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 23:2851–2854CrossRef Delibegovic S, Matovic E (2009) Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 23:2851–2854CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5:176–178CrossRefPubMed Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5:176–178CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reissfelder C, Mc Cafferty B, von Frankenberg M (2009) Open appendectomy. When do we still need it? Chirurg 80:602–607CrossRefPubMed Reissfelder C, Mc Cafferty B, von Frankenberg M (2009) Open appendectomy. When do we still need it? Chirurg 80:602–607CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner M, Aronsky D, Tschudi J, Metzger A, Klaiber C (1996) Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 10:895–899CrossRefPubMed Wagner M, Aronsky D, Tschudi J, Metzger A, Klaiber C (1996) Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 10:895–899CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Arcovedo R, Barrera H, Reyes HS (2007) Securing the appendiceal stump with the Gea extracorporeal sliding knot during laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and economical. Surg Endosc 21:1764–1767CrossRefPubMed Arcovedo R, Barrera H, Reyes HS (2007) Securing the appendiceal stump with the Gea extracorporeal sliding knot during laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and economical. Surg Endosc 21:1764–1767CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuehnel F, Marusch F, Koch A, Gastinger I (2007) Retained loose linear cutter staples after laparoscopic appendectomy as the cause of mechanical small bowel obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:717–718CrossRefPubMed Kuehnel F, Marusch F, Koch A, Gastinger I (2007) Retained loose linear cutter staples after laparoscopic appendectomy as the cause of mechanical small bowel obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:717–718CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yano H, Okada K, Kinuta M, Nakano Y, Tono T, Matsui S, Iwazawa T, Kanoh T, Monden T (2003) Efficacy of absorbable clips compared with metal clips for cystic duct ligation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 33:18–23CrossRefPubMed Yano H, Okada K, Kinuta M, Nakano Y, Tono T, Matsui S, Iwazawa T, Kanoh T, Monden T (2003) Efficacy of absorbable clips compared with metal clips for cystic duct ligation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 33:18–23CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindemann F, Geissler B, Hausser L, Witte J (1997) Laparoscopically placed clips on the human cystic duct—an experimental comparison of dislocation between resorbable and titanium clips. Chirurg 68:244–246CrossRefPubMed Lindemann F, Geissler B, Hausser L, Witte J (1997) Laparoscopically placed clips on the human cystic duct—an experimental comparison of dislocation between resorbable and titanium clips. Chirurg 68:244–246CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18:749–750CrossRefPubMed Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18:749–750CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Binnebosel M, Otto J, Stumpf M, Mahnken AH, Gassler N, Schumpelick V, Truong S (2009) Acute appendicitis. modern diagnostics–surgical ultrasound. Chirurg 80:579–587CrossRefPubMed Binnebosel M, Otto J, Stumpf M, Mahnken AH, Gassler N, Schumpelick V, Truong S (2009) Acute appendicitis. modern diagnostics–surgical ultrasound. Chirurg 80:579–587CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, Katkhouda N, Chan L, Berne T (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20:495–499CrossRefPubMed Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, Katkhouda N, Chan L, Berne T (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20:495–499CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yagmurlu A, Vernon A, Barnhart DC, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 20:1051–1054CrossRefPubMed Yagmurlu A, Vernon A, Barnhart DC, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 20:1051–1054CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028CrossRefPubMed Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337CrossRefPubMed Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448, discussion 448–450PubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448, discussion 448–450PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump
verfasst von
Lars Ivo Partecke
Wolfram Kessler
Wolfram von Bernstorff
Stephan Diedrich
Claus-Dieter Heidecke
Maciej Patrzyk
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2010
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0671-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2010

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Case Management & Clinical Consequences

Robotic partial splenectomy for hydatid cyst of the spleen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.