Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 3/2011

01.03.2011 | Original Article

A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience

verfasst von: Pierluigi di Sebastiano, Leonardina Festa, Antonio De Bonis, Andrea Ciuffreda, Maria Rosa Valvano, Angelo Andriulli, F. Francesco di Mola

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a fast-track protocol in a high-volume center for patients with pancreatic disorders.

Background

The concept of fast-track surgery allowing accelerated postoperative recovery is accepted in colorectal surgery, but efficacy data are only preliminary for patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a modified fast-track protocol in a high-volume center for patients with pancreatic disorders.

Methods

Between February 2005 and January 2010, 145 subjects had resective pancreatic surgery and were enrolled in the program. Essential features of the program were no preanaesthetic medication, upper and lower air-warming device, avoidance of excessive i.v. fluids perioperatively, effective control of pain, early reinstitution of oral feeding, and immediate mobilization and restoration of bowel function following surgery. Outcome measures were postoperative complications such as pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, biliary leak, intra-abdominal abscess, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, acute pancreatitis, wound infection, 30-day mortality, postoperative hospital stay, and readmission rates.

Results

On average, patients were discharged on postoperative day 10 (range 6–69), with a 30-day readmission rate of 6.2%. Percentage of patients with at least one complication was 38.6%. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage occurred in seven of 101 pancreatico-jejunostomies, and biliary leak in three of 109 biliary jejunostomies. Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in ten (6.9%) patients and wound infection in nine (6.2%) cases. In-hospital mortality was 2.7%. Fast-track parameters, such as normal food and first stool, correlated significantly with early discharge (<0.05). At multivariate analysis, lack of jaundice, and resumption of normal diet by the 5th postoperative day were independent factors of early discharge.

Conclusion

Fast-track programs are feasible, easy, and also applicable for patients undergoing a major surgery such as pancreatic resection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 Oct 18; (4): CD004080 Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 Oct 18; (4): CD004080
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wiggers T (2006) Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8:259–265PubMedCrossRef Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wiggers T (2006) Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8:259–265PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Dahal JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Dahal JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Minowada G, Welch WJ (1995) Clinical implication of the stress response. J Clin Invest 95:3–12PubMedCrossRef Minowada G, Welch WJ (1995) Clinical implication of the stress response. J Clin Invest 95:3–12PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H (1991) The surgical stress response: should it be prevented? Can J Surg 34:565–567PubMed Kehlet H (1991) The surgical stress response: should it be prevented? Can J Surg 34:565–567PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bessey PQ (1995) Metabolic response to critical illness. In: Wilmore DW, Cheung LY, Harken AH, Holcroft JW, Meakins JL (eds) Scientific American surgery. Scientific American INC, New York, pp 1–31 Bessey PQ (1995) Metabolic response to critical illness. In: Wilmore DW, Cheung LY, Harken AH, Holcroft JW, Meakins JL (eds) Scientific American surgery. Scientific American INC, New York, pp 1–31
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill GL, Douglas RG, Schroeder D (1993) Metabolic basis for the management of patients undergoing major surgery. World J Surg 17:144–153 Hill GL, Douglas RG, Schroeder D (1993) Metabolic basis for the management of patients undergoing major surgery. World J Surg 17:144–153
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRef Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’Graggen K (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMedCrossRef Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’Graggen K (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Russel RC, Bramhall S, Theis B (1997) Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1,026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 84:1370–1376PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Russel RC, Bramhall S, Theis B (1997) Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1,026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 84:1370–1376PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resection: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398PubMedCrossRef Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resection: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Ord SE, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Zahurak ML, Grochow LB, Abrams RA (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Ord SE, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Zahurak ML, Grochow LB, Abrams RA (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, Obertop H (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795PubMedCrossRef Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, Obertop H (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Berberat PO, Ingold H, Gulbinas A, Kleeff J, Müller MW, Gutt C, Weigand M, Friess H, Büchler MW (2007) Fast track—different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:880–887PubMedCrossRef Berberat PO, Ingold H, Gulbinas A, Kleeff J, Müller MW, Gutt C, Weigand M, Friess H, Büchler MW (2007) Fast track—different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:880–887PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di Carlo V (2008) Fast- track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95:1387–1393PubMedCrossRef Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di Carlo V (2008) Fast- track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95:1387–1393PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullingham A, Strunin L (1995) Prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Br J Anaesth 75:622–630PubMed Bullingham A, Strunin L (1995) Prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Br J Anaesth 75:622–630PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagar PM, Kruegener G, MacFie J (1992) Nasogastric intubation and elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 79:1127–1131PubMedCrossRef Sagar PM, Kruegener G, MacFie J (1992) Nasogastric intubation and elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 79:1127–1131PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL (1995) A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221:469–476PubMedCrossRef Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL (1995) A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221:469–476PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowbotham DJ, Smith G (1992) Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 69(suppl1):1–68 Rowbotham DJ, Smith G (1992) Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 69(suppl1):1–68
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Büchler M, For the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Büchler M, For the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fungerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fungerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Z’graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Büchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737PubMedCrossRef Z’graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Büchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245:187–200PubMedCrossRef Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245:187–200PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartel M, Wente MN, Hinz U, Kleeff J, Wagner M, Müller MW, Friess H, Büchler MW (2005) Effect of antecolic reconstruction on delayed gastric emptying after the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure. Arch Surg 140:1094–1099PubMedCrossRef Hartel M, Wente MN, Hinz U, Kleeff J, Wagner M, Müller MW, Friess H, Büchler MW (2005) Effect of antecolic reconstruction on delayed gastric emptying after the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure. Arch Surg 140:1094–1099PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller MW, Friess H, Beger HG, Kleeff J, Lauterburg B, Glasbrenner B, Riepl RL, Büchler MW (1997) Gastric emptying following pylorus-preserving Whipple and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 173:257–263PubMedCrossRef Muller MW, Friess H, Beger HG, Kleeff J, Lauterburg B, Glasbrenner B, Riepl RL, Büchler MW (1997) Gastric emptying following pylorus-preserving Whipple and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 173:257–263PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience
verfasst von
Pierluigi di Sebastiano
Leonardina Festa
Antonio De Bonis
Andrea Ciuffreda
Maria Rosa Valvano
Angelo Andriulli
F. Francesco di Mola
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0707-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.