Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2011

01.06.2011 | Original Article

Six years after: complications and long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with different devices

verfasst von: Volker Kahlke, Jens Uwe Bock, Hans Günter Peleikis, Johannes Jongen

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) was introduced in 1998. Early in the experience, a standard circular stapler was often used, while later specifically designed staplers for SH were developed. Although the diameter of the circular cutting knife differ significantly, it remains unclear, if the volume of the excised tissue differs and if this has an influence on the long-term results and complications.

Methods

We evaluated in a prospective consecutive database that underwent SH from January 2003 through April 2004. There were three devices used during the study period: end-to-end-anastomosis (EEA) 31, stapler device for haemorrhoids (SDH) and procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids (PPH). Procedure selection was at the discretion of the surgeon; however, the indications for surgery were similar for all involved surgeons. Demographic and operative characteristics were analysed. Follow-up data were collected continuously over the time, and in May 2010, these patients received a questionnaire. Data were compared by t test and chi-square test, respectively.

Results

There were 214 (97 females) evaluable patients. Seventy-three patients were operated with EEA-31, 52 with SDH- and 89 with PPH. The median follow-up was 6.8 years and complete data were available for 131 (61.2%) patients. Demographic characteristics were comparable within the three groups. SDH (6 ml) and PPH (6.5 ml) resected significantly (p < 0.05) more tissue than EEA (5 ml). Early postoperative incontinence rate was significantly higher in the PPH group (6%) as compared to EEA (1%) and SDH (0%). The incidence of other early complications was similar across techniques. The overall complication rates and reoperation rates were similar. Although 41% of the patients had minor anorectal complaints (itching and soiling), incontinence rates were low (2–3%) without any significant differences between the devices.

Conclusions

The results of cohort of SH patients support the conclusion that short- and long-term outcomes are device independent, although each approach is associated with a modest degree of ongoing anorectal symptoms.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Institutes (Kasachstan) 27–28. Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Institutes (Kasachstan) 27–28.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore 777–784 Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore 777–784
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H et al (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H et al (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244PubMedCrossRef Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs. open with ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 19:235–239PubMedCrossRef Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs. open with ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 19:235–239PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C et al (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessment at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675PubMedCrossRef Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C et al (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessment at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang W, Chin C, Yeh C, Lin P, Wang J (2007) Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:955–961PubMedCrossRef Huang W, Chin C, Yeh C, Lin P, Wang J (2007) Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:955–961PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabanci U, Ogun I, Candemir G (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. J Int Med Res 35:917–921PubMed Sabanci U, Ogun I, Candemir G (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. J Int Med Res 35:917–921PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M (2004) Konventionelle exzision versus resektion mit dem. Klammernahtgerät. Prospektiv, randomisierte studie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1611–1617PubMedCrossRef Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M (2004) Konventionelle exzision versus resektion mit dem. Klammernahtgerät. Prospektiv, randomisierte studie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1611–1617PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HP et al (2006) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:166–171PubMedCrossRef Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HP et al (2006) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:166–171PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Aigner F, Bonatti H, Peer S et al (2010) Vascular considerations for stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 12:452–458PubMedCrossRef Aigner F, Bonatti H, Peer S et al (2010) Vascular considerations for stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 12:452–458PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1437–1444PubMedCrossRef Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1437–1444PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirsch JJ, Staude G, Herold A (2001) Hämorrhoidektomien nach Longo und Milligan-Morgan. Prospektive vergleichsstudie mit 300 patienten. Chirurg 72:180–185PubMedCrossRef Kirsch JJ, Staude G, Herold A (2001) Hämorrhoidektomien nach Longo und Milligan-Morgan. Prospektive vergleichsstudie mit 300 patienten. Chirurg 72:180–185PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733PubMedCrossRef Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Huang T, Hsu G et al (2002) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—prospective analysis of 180 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:A36–A37, abstract Chen W, Huang T, Hsu G et al (2002) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—prospective analysis of 180 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:A36–A37, abstract
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jongen J, Eberstein J, Bock JU, Peleikis HG, Kahlke V (2010) Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Lessons learned from 1233 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1049–1054PubMedCrossRef Jongen J, Eberstein J, Bock JU, Peleikis HG, Kahlke V (2010) Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Lessons learned from 1233 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1049–1054PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12(1):7–19PubMedCrossRef Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12(1):7–19PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178PubMedCrossRef Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053PubMedCrossRef Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1375PubMedCrossRef Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1375PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti S (2007) Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 94:1033–1037PubMedCrossRef Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti S (2007) Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 94:1033–1037PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K et al (2002) A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1395–1406PubMedCrossRef Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K et al (2002) A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1395–1406PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat ShaoWJ Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRef ShaoWJ Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi GP, Neugebauer EA, Collaboration PROSPECT (2010) Evidence-based management of pain after haemorrhoidectomy surgery. Br J Surg 97:1155–1168PubMedCrossRef Joshi GP, Neugebauer EA, Collaboration PROSPECT (2010) Evidence-based management of pain after haemorrhoidectomy surgery. Br J Surg 97:1155–1168PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraman S, Coquhoun PHD, Mathaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305PubMedCrossRef Jayaraman S, Coquhoun PHD, Mathaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845PubMedCrossRef Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari Sari A et al (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 11:233–243PubMedCrossRef Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari Sari A et al (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 11:233–243PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapler haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systemic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:335–344PubMedCrossRef Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapler haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systemic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:335–344PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jongen J, Petersen S (2009) Letter to the editor: reviewing reviewers and reanalysing meta-analyses of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:989PubMedCrossRef Jongen J, Petersen S (2009) Letter to the editor: reviewing reviewers and reanalysing meta-analyses of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:989PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jongen J, Kahlke V, Petersen S (2010) Correspondence(letter to the editor): who assesses the quality of systematic reviews? Dtsch Arztebl Int 107(4):57PubMed Jongen J, Kahlke V, Petersen S (2010) Correspondence(letter to the editor): who assesses the quality of systematic reviews? Dtsch Arztebl Int 107(4):57PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferential prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178PubMedCrossRef Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferential prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674PubMedCrossRef Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Six years after: complications and long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with different devices
verfasst von
Volker Kahlke
Jens Uwe Bock
Hans Günter Peleikis
Johannes Jongen
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0787-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.