Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2011

01.08.2011 | Original Article

Critical appraisal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy

verfasst von: Thilo Welsch, Hanna Eisele, Stefanie Zschäbitz, Ulf Hinz, Markus W. Büchler, Moritz N. Wente

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the most serious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study analyzed and validated the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of PPH and aimed to identify risk factors for early (<24 h) and late PPH.

Methods

Patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head tumors between 2001 and 2008 were included and complications were prospectively recorded. Factors associated with PPH were assessed by uni- and multivariate analysis.

Results

Complete datasets were available for 796 patients. Classic and pylorus-preserving PD was performed in 13.8% and 86.2% of the patients, respectively. According to the ISGPS definition, PPH occurred in 29.1% of the cases (232 of 796 patients): 4.8% grade A, 15.2% grade B, and 9.2% grade C. The definition is based largely on surrogate markers (e.g., transfusion requirement) that are affected by other critical illnesses and more than 97% of patients with mild PPH had no clinical signs of bleeding. The need for postoperative intensive care as well as the incidence of pancreatic fistula, relaparotomy, and mortality rates significantly increased from grades A to C. Thirty-seven patients (4.6%) required interventional (endoscopy or angiography) and/or relaparotomy for PPH. Relaparotomy for PPH was performed in 3.1% of all patients.
Independent risk factors for early PPH were preoperative anemia (hemoglobin, <11 mg/dl) and multivisceral resection while advanced age, chronic renal insufficiency, increased blood loss, and long operation time were associated with late PPH.

Conclusions

The ISGPS definition of PPH is feasible and applicable but produces a high rate of false positive mild PPH cases. The different grades still significantly correlate with relevant outcome variables, thus the definition discriminates postoperative courses, but a minor modification of the definition of mild PPH is suggested. The new results further demonstrate the need to optimize preoperative anemia and chronic renal insufficiency.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP (2007) Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 204:356–364PubMedCrossRef Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP (2007) Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 204:356–364PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M, Strobel O, Buchler MW, Werner J (2009) Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 250:81–87PubMedCrossRef Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M, Strobel O, Buchler MW, Werner J (2009) Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 250:81–87PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons JP, Shah SA, Ng SC, Whalen GF, Tseng JF (2009) National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1798–1805PubMedCrossRef Simons JP, Shah SA, Ng SC, Whalen GF, Tseng JF (2009) National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1798–1805PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210, discussion 1210–1191PubMedCrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210, discussion 1210–1191PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Balcom JHt, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398PubMedCrossRef Balcom JHt, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat van Berge Henegouwen MI, Allema JH, van Gulik TM, Verbeek PC, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (1995) Delayed massive haemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery. Br J Surg 82:1527–1531PubMedCrossRef van Berge Henegouwen MI, Allema JH, van Gulik TM, Verbeek PC, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (1995) Delayed massive haemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery. Br J Surg 82:1527–1531PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM, Kaifi J, Schurr PG, Bubenheim M, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G, Izbicki JR (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280PubMedCrossRef Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM, Kaifi J, Schurr PG, Bubenheim M, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G, Izbicki JR (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano MR, Andriulli A, di Mola FF (2011) A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:345–351PubMedCrossRef di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano MR, Andriulli A, di Mola FF (2011) A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:345–351PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyer L, Bonmardion R, Marciano S, Hartung O, Ramis O, Chabert L, Leone M, Emungania O, Orsoni P, Barthet M, Berdah SV, Brunet C, Moutardier V (2009) Results of non-operative therapy for delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:922–928PubMedCrossRef Beyer L, Bonmardion R, Marciano S, Hartung O, Ramis O, Chabert L, Leone M, Emungania O, Orsoni P, Barthet M, Berdah SV, Brunet C, Moutardier V (2009) Results of non-operative therapy for delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:922–928PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Limongelli P, Khorsandi SE, Pai M, Jackson JE, Tait P, Tierris J, Habib NA, Williamson RC, Jiao LR (2008) Management of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 143:1001–1007, discussion 1007PubMedCrossRef Limongelli P, Khorsandi SE, Pai M, Jackson JE, Tait P, Tierris J, Habib NA, Williamson RC, Jiao LR (2008) Management of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 143:1001–1007, discussion 1007PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien YW, Lee PH, Yang CY, Ho MC, Chiu YF (2005) Risk factors of massive bleeding related to pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:554–559PubMedCrossRef Tien YW, Lee PH, Yang CY, Ho MC, Chiu YF (2005) Risk factors of massive bleeding related to pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:554–559PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Gutt CN, Buchler MW, Friess H (2006) Management of early hemorrhage from pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 23:203–208PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Gutt CN, Buchler MW, Friess H (2006) Management of early hemorrhage from pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 23:203–208PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weitz J, Kienle P, Schmidt J, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Portal vein resection for advanced pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 204:712–716PubMedCrossRef Weitz J, Kienle P, Schmidt J, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Portal vein resection for advanced pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 204:712–716PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackert T, Werner J, Weitz J, Schmidt J, Buchler MW (2010) Uncinate process first–a novel approach for pancreatic head resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1161–1164PubMedCrossRef Hackert T, Werner J, Weitz J, Schmidt J, Buchler MW (2010) Uncinate process first–a novel approach for pancreatic head resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1161–1164PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajarathinam G, Kannan DG, Vimalraj V, Amudhan A, Rajendran S, Jyotibasu D, Balachandar TG, Jeswanth S, Ravichandran P, Surendran R (2008) Post pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage: outcome prediction based on new ISGPS Clinical severity grading. HPB (Oxford) 10:363–370 Rajarathinam G, Kannan DG, Vimalraj V, Amudhan A, Rajendran S, Jyotibasu D, Balachandar TG, Jeswanth S, Ravichandran P, Surendran R (2008) Post pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage: outcome prediction based on new ISGPS Clinical severity grading. HPB (Oxford) 10:363–370
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Giorgio A, Alfieri S, Rotondi F, Prete F, Di Miceli D, Ridolfini MP, Rosa F, Covino M, Doglietto GB (2005) Pancreatoduodenectomy for tumors of Vater’s ampulla: report on 94 consecutive patients. World J Surg 29:513–518PubMedCrossRef Di Giorgio A, Alfieri S, Rotondi F, Prete F, Di Miceli D, Ridolfini MP, Rosa F, Covino M, Doglietto GB (2005) Pancreatoduodenectomy for tumors of Vater’s ampulla: report on 94 consecutive patients. World J Surg 29:513–518PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yao HS, Wang Q, Wang WJ, Hu ZQ (2008) Intraoperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in ampullary cancer outcome after curative pancreatoduodenectomy: a clinical study and meta-analysis. World J Surg 32:2038–2046PubMedCrossRef Yao HS, Wang Q, Wang WJ, Hu ZQ (2008) Intraoperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in ampullary cancer outcome after curative pancreatoduodenectomy: a clinical study and meta-analysis. World J Surg 32:2038–2046PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Welsch T, Degrate L, Zschabitz S, Hofer S, Werner J, Schmidt J (2011) The need for extended intensive care after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:353–362PubMedCrossRef Welsch T, Degrate L, Zschabitz S, Hofer S, Werner J, Schmidt J (2011) The need for extended intensive care after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:353–362PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark E, Connor S, Taylor MA, Hendry CL, Madhavan KK, Garden OJ, Parks RW (2007) Perioperative transfusion for pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 9:472–477 Clark E, Connor S, Taylor MA, Hendry CL, Madhavan KK, Garden OJ, Parks RW (2007) Perioperative transfusion for pancreaticoduodenectomy and its impact on prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 9:472–477
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SJ, Kim SW, Jang JY, Lee KU, Park YH (2002) Intraoperative transfusion: is it a real prognostic factor of periampullary cancer following pancreatoduodenectomy? World J Surg 26:487–492PubMedCrossRef Park SJ, Kim SW, Jang JY, Lee KU, Park YH (2002) Intraoperative transfusion: is it a real prognostic factor of periampullary cancer following pancreatoduodenectomy? World J Surg 26:487–492PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MK, Dinorcia J, Reavey PL, Holden MM, Genkinger JM, Lee JA, Schrope BA, Chabot JA, Allendorf JD (2010) Pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in patients aged 80 years and older. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1838–1846PubMedCrossRef Lee MK, Dinorcia J, Reavey PL, Holden MM, Genkinger JM, Lee JA, Schrope BA, Chabot JA, Allendorf JD (2010) Pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in patients aged 80 years and older. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1838–1846PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballarin R, Spaggiari M, Di Benedetto F, Montalti R, Masetti M, De Ruvo N, Romano A, Guerrini GP, De Blasiis MG, Gerunda GE (2009) Do not deny pancreatic resection to elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 13:341–348PubMedCrossRef Ballarin R, Spaggiari M, Di Benedetto F, Montalti R, Masetti M, De Ruvo N, Romano A, Guerrini GP, De Blasiis MG, Gerunda GE (2009) Do not deny pancreatic resection to elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 13:341–348PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan S, Sclabas G, Lombardo KR, Sarr MG, Nagorney D, Kendrick ML, Donohue JH, Que FG, Farnell MB (2010) Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the very elderly; is it safe and justified? J Gastrointest Surg 14:1826–1831PubMedCrossRef Khan S, Sclabas G, Lombardo KR, Sarr MG, Nagorney D, Kendrick ML, Donohue JH, Que FG, Farnell MB (2010) Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the very elderly; is it safe and justified? J Gastrointest Surg 14:1826–1831PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199:432–437PubMedCrossRef Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199:432–437PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchida H, Shibata K, Kai S, Iwaki K, Ohta M, Kitano S (2008) Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Surg Today 38:1152–1154PubMedCrossRef Uchida H, Shibata K, Kai S, Iwaki K, Ohta M, Kitano S (2008) Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Surg Today 38:1152–1154PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Schareck WD, Benz S, Hopt UT (2004) Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am J Surg 187:201–208PubMedCrossRef Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Schareck WD, Benz S, Hopt UT (2004) Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am J Surg 187:201–208PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK, Mehr KT, Wente MN, Kieser M, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:41–52PubMedCrossRef Diener MK, Mehr KT, Wente MN, Kieser M, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:41–52PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Critical appraisal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy
verfasst von
Thilo Welsch
Hanna Eisele
Stefanie Zschäbitz
Ulf Hinz
Markus W. Büchler
Moritz N. Wente
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0811-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.