Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2012

01.01.2012 | Original Article

Multivisceral and standard resections in colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Martin Hoffmann, Carmen Phillips, Elisabeth Oevermann, Claudia Killaitis, Uwe-Johannes Roblick, Philipp Hildebrand, Conny Georg Buerk, Heike Wolken, Peter Kujath, Erik Schloericke, Hans-Peter Bruch

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The current study was designed to identify prognostic factors for long-term survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer in a consecutive cohort.

Methods

A total of 123 patients were operated because of T4 colorectal cancer between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2008 in the Clinic of Surgery, UK-SH Campus Luebeck.

Results

A total of 78 patients underwent a multivisceral resection. The postoperative morbidity was elevated in the patient group with multivisceral resections (34.6% vs. 26.7%). Nevertheless, we detected no significant differences concerning 30 days mortality (7.7% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.815). The main prognostic factor that reached significance in the multivariate analysis was the possibility to obtain a R0 resection (p < 0.0001) resulting in a 5-year survival rate of 55% for patients with curative resection. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year survival between multivisceral and non-multivisceral resections (p = 0.608). Also we were not able to detect any significant differences for cancer of colonic or rectal origin (p = 0.839), for laparoscopic vs. open procedures (p = 0.610), and for emergency vs. planned operations (p = 0.674). Moreover, the existence of lymph node metastases was not a predictive factor concerning survival as there was no difference between patients with and without lymph node metastases (p = 0.658).

Conclusions

Multivisceral resections are associated with the same 5-year survival as standard resections. Therefore, the aim to perform a R0 resection should always be the main goal in surgery for colorectal cancer. In planned operations, a laparoscopic approach is justified in selected patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Bouvier AM, Foschi R, Hackl M, Larsen IK, Lemmens V, Mangone L, Francisci S (2011) Progress in colorectal cancer survival in Europe, from the late 1980s to the early 21st century: The EUROCARE study. Int J Cancer. doi:10.1002/ijc.26192 Brenner H, Bouvier AM, Foschi R, Hackl M, Larsen IK, Lemmens V, Mangone L, Francisci S (2011) Progress in colorectal cancer survival in Europe, from the late 1980s to the early 21st century: The EUROCARE study. Int J Cancer. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​26192
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gebhardt C, Meyer W, Ruckriegel S, Meier U (1999) Multivisceral resection of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 384:194–199CrossRef Gebhardt C, Meyer W, Ruckriegel S, Meier U (1999) Multivisceral resection of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 384:194–199CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehnert T, Methner M, Pollok A, Schaible A, Hinz U, Herfarth C (2002) Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer. An analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients. Ann Surg 235:217–225PubMedCrossRef Lehnert T, Methner M, Pollok A, Schaible A, Hinz U, Herfarth C (2002) Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer. An analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients. Ann Surg 235:217–225PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakafusa Y, Tanaka T, Tanaka M, Kitajima Y, Sato S, Miyazaki K (2004) Comparison of multivisceral resection and standard operation for locally advanced colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2055–2063PubMedCrossRef Nakafusa Y, Tanaka T, Tanaka M, Kitajima Y, Sato S, Miyazaki K (2004) Comparison of multivisceral resection and standard operation for locally advanced colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2055–2063PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Croner RS, Merkel S, Papadopoulos T, Schellerer V, Hohenberger W, Goehl J (2009) Multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52(8):1381–1386PubMedCrossRef Croner RS, Merkel S, Papadopoulos T, Schellerer V, Hohenberger W, Goehl J (2009) Multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52(8):1381–1386PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenberg SB, Kraybill WG, Lopez MJ (1990) Long-term results of surgical resection of locally advanced colorectal cancer. Surgery 108:779–786PubMed Eisenberg SB, Kraybill WG, Lopez MJ (1990) Long-term results of surgical resection of locally advanced colorectal cancer. Surgery 108:779–786PubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Radespiel-Troeger M, Hohenberger W, Reingruber B (2004) Improved prediction of recurrence after curative resection of colon carcinoma using tree-based risk stratification. Cancer 100:958–967CrossRef Radespiel-Troeger M, Hohenberger W, Reingruber B (2004) Improved prediction of recurrence after curative resection of colon carcinoma using tree-based risk stratification. Cancer 100:958–967CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai HL, Lu CY, Hsieh JS, Wu DC, Jan CM, Chai CY, Chu KS, Chan HM, Wang JY (2007) The prognostic significance of total lymph node harvest in patients with T2-4N0M0 colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11(5):660–665PubMedCrossRef Tsai HL, Lu CY, Hsieh JS, Wu DC, Jan CM, Chai CY, Chu KS, Chan HM, Wang JY (2007) The prognostic significance of total lymph node harvest in patients with T2-4N0M0 colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11(5):660–665PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjo OH, Larsen S, Lunde OC, Nesbakken A (2009) Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 11(7):733–739PubMedCrossRef Sjo OH, Larsen S, Lunde OC, Nesbakken A (2009) Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 11(7):733–739PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter JA, Ryan JA, Schultz P (1987) En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg 145:67–71 Hunter JA, Ryan JA, Schultz P (1987) En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg 145:67–71
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gall FP, Tonak J, Altendorf A (1987) Multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 30:337–341PubMedCrossRef Gall FP, Tonak J, Altendorf A (1987) Multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 30:337–341PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruschewski M, Pohlen U, Hotz HG, Ritz JP, Kroesen AJ, Buhr HJ (2006) Results of multivisceral resection of primary colorectal cancer. Zentralbl Chir 131:217–222PubMedCrossRef Kruschewski M, Pohlen U, Hotz HG, Ritz JP, Kroesen AJ, Buhr HJ (2006) Results of multivisceral resection of primary colorectal cancer. Zentralbl Chir 131:217–222PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C (1995) Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:480–487PubMedCrossRef Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C (1995) Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:480–487PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JH, Hole D, McArdle CS (1992) Elective versus emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:1557–1562 Anderson JH, Hole D, McArdle CS (1992) Elective versus emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:1557–1562
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkel S, Meyer C, Papadopoulos T, Meyer T, Hohenberger W (2007) Urgent surgery in colon carcinoma. Zentralbl Chir 132:16–25PubMedCrossRef Merkel S, Meyer C, Papadopoulos T, Meyer T, Hohenberger W (2007) Urgent surgery in colon carcinoma. Zentralbl Chir 132:16–25PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreoni B, Chiappa A, Bertani E, Bellomi M, Orecchia R, Zampino M, Fazio N, Venturino M, Orsi F, Sonzogni A, Pace U, Monfardini L (2007) Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients. World J Surg Oncol 5:73PubMedCrossRef Andreoni B, Chiappa A, Bertani E, Bellomi M, Orecchia R, Zampino M, Fazio N, Venturino M, Orsi F, Sonzogni A, Pace U, Monfardini L (2007) Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients. World J Surg Oncol 5:73PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Darakhshan A, Lin BPFC, Chan C, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Bokey L (2008) Correlates and outcomes of tumor adherence in resected colonic and rectal cancers. Ann Surg 247:650–658PubMedCrossRef Darakhshan A, Lin BPFC, Chan C, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Bokey L (2008) Correlates and outcomes of tumor adherence in resected colonic and rectal cancers. Ann Surg 247:650–658PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003432PubMed Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003432PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y (2011) T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Colorectal Dis 13(2):138–143PubMedCrossRef Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y (2011) T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Colorectal Dis 13(2):138–143PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG, Skull AJ, Senapati A, O’Leary DP, Parvaiz A (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg Jul 252(1):84–89 Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG, Skull AJ, Senapati A, O’Leary DP, Parvaiz A (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg Jul 252(1):84–89
Metadaten
Titel
Multivisceral and standard resections in colorectal cancer
verfasst von
Martin Hoffmann
Carmen Phillips
Elisabeth Oevermann
Claudia Killaitis
Uwe-Johannes Roblick
Philipp Hildebrand
Conny Georg Buerk
Heike Wolken
Peter Kujath
Erik Schloericke
Hans-Peter Bruch
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0854-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.