Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv 5/2016

25.08.2016 | Original Article

ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers and long-term ex-smokers: prevalence and detection by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization

verfasst von: Andrew S Williams, Wenda Greer, Drew Bethune, Kenneth J Craddock, Gordon Flowerdew, Zhaolin Xu

Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

ALK gene rearrangements are identified in 2–5 % of all non-small cell lung cancer and are more common in lifetime non-smokers with adenocarcinoma, but the prevalence of ALK rearrangements is not as well characterized in long-term ex-smokers (quit >10 years prior to diagnosis). Accurate and timely diagnosis of ALK-rearranged tumors is of clinical importance given the remarkable response to targeted inhibitors. ALK gene rearrangement may be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and abnormal expression of ALK protein may be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), the latter of which is faster and less expensive. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of ALK rearrangement in non-smokers and long-term ex-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma and to assess the performance of IHC for the detection of ALK+ tumors when compared to FISH. Two hundred fifty-one cases of resected lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed, including non-smokers (n = 79) or long-term ex-smokers (n = 172). ALK IHC and ALK FISH were performed on each case. Four cases demonstrated ALK rearrangement by FISH (4/251; 1.6 %). All cases were non-smokers (4/79; 5.1 %), and all were positive for ALK by IHC. No additional cases were considered positive by IHC, and only 26 (10.4 %) cases were considered equivocal using a conservative approach to interpretation, resulting in a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 89.5 %. ALK rearrangement was not observed in lung adenocarcinoma arising in long-term ex-smokers, whereas it is seen in up to 5.1 % of lifetime non-smokers. ALK IHC using the 5A4 antibody demonstrates high sensitivity, supporting its use as a screening test.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Islami F, Torre L, Jemal A (2015) Global trends of lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 4(4):327–338PubMedPubMedCentral Islami F, Torre L, Jemal A (2015) Global trends of lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 4(4):327–338PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobin NP, Foukakis T, De Petris L, et al. (2015) The importance of molecular markers for diagnosis and selection of targeted treatments in patients with cancer. J Intern Med 278(6):545–570. doi:10.1111/joim.12429 CrossRefPubMed Tobin NP, Foukakis T, De Petris L, et al. (2015) The importance of molecular markers for diagnosis and selection of targeted treatments in patients with cancer. J Intern Med 278(6):545–570. doi:10.​1111/​joim.​12429 CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian J, Govindan R (2007) Lung cancer in never smokers: a review. J Clin Oncol 25(5):561–570CrossRefPubMed Subramanian J, Govindan R (2007) Lung cancer in never smokers: a review. J Clin Oncol 25(5):561–570CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sampsonas F, Ryan D, McPhillips D, et al. (2014) Molecular testing and personalized treatment of lung cancer. Curr Mol Pharmacol 7(1):22–32CrossRefPubMed Sampsonas F, Ryan D, McPhillips D, et al. (2014) Molecular testing and personalized treatment of lung cancer. Curr Mol Pharmacol 7(1):22–32CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Popper H, Ryska A, Tímár J, et al. (2014) Molecular testing in lung cancer in the era of precision medicine. Transl Lung Cancer Res 3(5):291–300PubMedPubMedCentral Popper H, Ryska A, Tímár J, et al. (2014) Molecular testing in lung cancer in the era of precision medicine. Transl Lung Cancer Res 3(5):291–300PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ali S, Ignatius Ou S, He J, et al. (2014) Identifying ALK rearrangements that are not detected by FISH with targeted next generation sequencing of lung carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 32(5s):suppl; abstr 8049. Ali S, Ignatius Ou S, He J, et al. (2014) Identifying ALK rearrangements that are not detected by FISH with targeted next generation sequencing of lung carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 32(5s):suppl; abstr 8049.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Han X, Zhang N, Ma L, et al. (2013) Immunohistochemistry reliably detects ALK rearrangements in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Virchows Arch 463(4):583–591CrossRefPubMed Han X, Zhang N, Ma L, et al. (2013) Immunohistochemistry reliably detects ALK rearrangements in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Virchows Arch 463(4):583–591CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyevleva A, Raskin G, Tiurin V, et al. (2015) Novel ALK fusion partners in lung cancer. Cancer Lett 362(1):116–121CrossRefPubMed Iyevleva A, Raskin G, Tiurin V, et al. (2015) Novel ALK fusion partners in lung cancer. Cancer Lett 362(1):116–121CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallander M, Geiersbach K, Tripp S, et al. (2012) Comparison of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization methodologies for detection of echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: implications for optimal clinical testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 136(7):796–803CrossRefPubMed Wallander M, Geiersbach K, Tripp S, et al. (2012) Comparison of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization methodologies for detection of echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: implications for optimal clinical testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 136(7):796–803CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Conklin CMJ, Craddock K, Have C, et al. (2013) Immunohistochemistry is a reliable screening tool for identification of ALK rearrangement in non-small-cell lung carcinoma and is antibody dependent. J Thorac Oncol 8(1):45–51CrossRefPubMed Conklin CMJ, Craddock K, Have C, et al. (2013) Immunohistochemistry is a reliable screening tool for identification of ALK rearrangement in non-small-cell lung carcinoma and is antibody dependent. J Thorac Oncol 8(1):45–51CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Doshi S, Ray D, Stein K, et al. (2016) Economic analysis of alternative strategies for detection of ALK rearrangements in non small cell lung cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 6(1). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics6010004 Doshi S, Ray D, Stein K, et al. (2016) Economic analysis of alternative strategies for detection of ALK rearrangements in non small cell lung cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 6(1). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics6010004
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun J, Choi Y, Won J, et al. (2012) A dramatic response to crizotinib in a non-small-cell lung cancer patient with IHC-positive and FISH-negative ALK. J Thorac Oncol 7(12):e36–e38CrossRefPubMed Sun J, Choi Y, Won J, et al. (2012) A dramatic response to crizotinib in a non-small-cell lung cancer patient with IHC-positive and FISH-negative ALK. J Thorac Oncol 7(12):e36–e38CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren S, Hirsch F, Varella Garcia M, et al. (2014) Atypical negative ALK break-apart FISH harboring a crizotinib-responsive ALK rearrangement in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 9(3):e21–e23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ren S, Hirsch F, Varella Garcia M, et al. (2014) Atypical negative ALK break-apart FISH harboring a crizotinib-responsive ALK rearrangement in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 9(3):e21–e23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled N, Palmer G, Hirsch F, et al. (2012) Next-generation sequencing identifies and immunohistochemistry confirms a novel crizotinib-sensitive ALK rearrangement in a patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 7(9):e14–e16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peled N, Palmer G, Hirsch F, et al. (2012) Next-generation sequencing identifies and immunohistochemistry confirms a novel crizotinib-sensitive ALK rearrangement in a patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 7(9):e14–e16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sholl L, Weremowicz S, Gray S, et al. (2013) Combined use of ALK immunohistochemistry and FISH for optimal detection of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol 8(3):322–328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sholl L, Weremowicz S, Gray S, et al. (2013) Combined use of ALK immunohistochemistry and FISH for optimal detection of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol 8(3):322–328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutz J, Craddock K, Torlakovic E, et al. (2014) Canadian anaplastic lymphoma kinase study: a model for multicenter standardization and optimization of ALK testing in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 9(9):1255–1263CrossRefPubMed Cutz J, Craddock K, Torlakovic E, et al. (2014) Canadian anaplastic lymphoma kinase study: a model for multicenter standardization and optimization of ALK testing in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 9(9):1255–1263CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pekar Zlotin M, Hirsch F, Soussan Gutman L, et al. (2015) Fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing for detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer. Oncologist 20(3):316–322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pekar Zlotin M, Hirsch F, Soussan Gutman L, et al. (2015) Fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing for detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer. Oncologist 20(3):316–322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagemann I, Devarakonda S, Lockwood C, et al. (2015) Clinical next-generation sequencing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 121(4):631–639CrossRefPubMed Hagemann I, Devarakonda S, Lockwood C, et al. (2015) Clinical next-generation sequencing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 121(4):631–639CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pritchard C, Salipante S, Koehler K, et al. (2014) Validation and implementation of targeted capture and sequencing for the detection of actionable mutation, copy number variation, and gene rearrangement in clinical cancer specimens. J Mol Diagn. 16(1):56–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pritchard C, Salipante S, Koehler K, et al. (2014) Validation and implementation of targeted capture and sequencing for the detection of actionable mutation, copy number variation, and gene rearrangement in clinical cancer specimens. J Mol Diagn. 16(1):56–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shackelford R, Vora M, Mayhall K, et al. (2014) ALK-rearrangements and testing methods in non-small cell lung cancer: a review. Genes Cancer 5(1–2):1–14PubMedPubMedCentral Shackelford R, Vora M, Mayhall K, et al. (2014) ALK-rearrangements and testing methods in non-small cell lung cancer: a review. Genes Cancer 5(1–2):1–14PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodig S, Mino Kenudson M, Dacic S, et al. (2009) Unique clinicopathologic features characterize ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma in the western population. Clin Cancer Res 15(16):5216–5223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rodig S, Mino Kenudson M, Dacic S, et al. (2009) Unique clinicopathologic features characterize ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma in the western population. Clin Cancer Res 15(16):5216–5223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Greer W, Douglas S, Xu Z, et al. (2015) Molecular diagnostics for lung cancer in Atlantic Canada. Canadian Journal of Pathology 7(1):20–26 Greer W, Douglas S, Xu Z, et al. (2015) Molecular diagnostics for lung cancer in Atlantic Canada. Canadian Journal of Pathology 7(1):20–26
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindeman N, Cagle P, Beasley M, et al. (2013) Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 15(4):415–453CrossRefPubMed Lindeman N, Cagle P, Beasley M, et al. (2013) Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 15(4):415–453CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi E, Boland J, Maleszewski J, et al. (2011) Correlation of IHC and FISH for ALK gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung carcinoma: IHC score algorithm for FISH. J Thorac Oncol 6(3):459–465CrossRefPubMed Yi E, Boland J, Maleszewski J, et al. (2011) Correlation of IHC and FISH for ALK gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung carcinoma: IHC score algorithm for FISH. J Thorac Oncol 6(3):459–465CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Minca E, Portier B, Wang Z, et al. (2013) ALK status testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma: correlation between ultrasensitive IHC and FISH. J Mol Diagn 15(3):341–346CrossRefPubMed Minca E, Portier B, Wang Z, et al. (2013) ALK status testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma: correlation between ultrasensitive IHC and FISH. J Mol Diagn 15(3):341–346CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabillic F, Gros A, Dugay F, et al. (2014) Parallel FISH and immunohistochemical studies of ALK status in 3244 non-small-cell lung cancers reveal major discordances. J Thorac Oncol 9(3):295–306CrossRefPubMed Cabillic F, Gros A, Dugay F, et al. (2014) Parallel FISH and immunohistochemical studies of ALK status in 3244 non-small-cell lung cancers reveal major discordances. J Thorac Oncol 9(3):295–306CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilie M, Hofman P (2015) Reply to the letter to the editor ‘ALK FISH rearranged and amplified tumor with negative immunohistochemistry: a rare and challenging case concerning ALK status screening in lung cancer’ by Uguen et al. Ann Oncol 26(8):1802CrossRefPubMed Ilie M, Hofman P (2015) Reply to the letter to the editor ‘ALK FISH rearranged and amplified tumor with negative immunohistochemistry: a rare and challenging case concerning ALK status screening in lung cancer’ by Uguen et al. Ann Oncol 26(8):1802CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Djalalov S, Beca J, Hoch J, et al. (2014) Cost effectiveness of EML4-ALK fusion testing and first-line crizotinib treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(10):1012–1019. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.1186 CrossRefPubMed Djalalov S, Beca J, Hoch J, et al. (2014) Cost effectiveness of EML4-ALK fusion testing and first-line crizotinib treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(10):1012–1019. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​53.​1186 CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerr KM, Bubendorf L, Edelman MJ, et al. (2014) Second ESMO consensus conference on lung cancer: pathology and molecular biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 25(9):1681–1690. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu145 CrossRefPubMed Kerr KM, Bubendorf L, Edelman MJ, et al. (2014) Second ESMO consensus conference on lung cancer: pathology and molecular biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 25(9):1681–1690. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdu145 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers and long-term ex-smokers: prevalence and detection by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
verfasst von
Andrew S Williams
Wenda Greer
Drew Bethune
Kenneth J Craddock
Gordon Flowerdew
Zhaolin Xu
Publikationsdatum
25.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Virchows Archiv / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2005-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Virchows Archiv 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

In this issue

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie