Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Pediatrics 5/2014

01.05.2014 | Original Article

Five-year experience of clinical ethics consultations in a pediatric teaching hospital

verfasst von: Jürg C. Streuli, Georg Staubli, Marlis Pfändler-Poletti, Ruth Baumann-Hölzle, Jörg Ersch

Erschienen in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Our retrospective study presents and evaluates clinical ethics consultations (CECs) in pediatrics as a structure for implementing hospital-wide ethics. We performed a descriptive and statistical analysis of clinical ethics decision making and its implementation in pediatric CECs at Zurich University Children’s Hospital. Ninety-five CECs were held over 5 years for 80 patients. The care team reached a consensus treatment recommendation after one session in 75 consultations (89 %) and on 82 of 84 ethical issues (98 %) after two or more sessions (11 repeats). Fifty-seven CECs recommended limited treatment and 23 maximal treatment. Team recommendations were agreed outright by parents and/or patient in 59 of 73 consultations (81 %). Initial dissensus yielded to explanatory discussion or repeat CEC in seven consultations (10 %). In a further seven families (10 %), no solution was found within the CEC framework: five (7 %) required involvement of the child protection service, and in two families, the parents took their child elsewhere. Eventual team–parent/patient consensus was reached in 66 of 73 families (90 %) with documented parental/patient decisions (missing data, n = 11). Patient preference was assessable in ten CECs. Patient autonomy was part of the ethical dilemma in only three CECs. The Zurich clinical ethics structure produced a 98 % intra-team consensus rate in 95 CECs and reduced initial team–parent dissensus from 21 to 10 %. Success depends closely on a standardized CEC protocol and an underlying institutional clinical ethics framework embodying a comprehensive set of transparently articulated values and opinions, with regular evaluation of decisions and their consequences for care teams and families.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams DM, Winslade WJ (2011) Consensus, clinical decision making, and unsettled cases. J Clin Ethics 22:310–327PubMed Adams DM, Winslade WJ (2011) Consensus, clinical decision making, and unsettled cases. J Clin Ethics 22:310–327PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Akre V, Falkum E, Hoftvedt BO, Aasland OG (1997) The communication atmosphere between physician colleagues: competitive perfectionism or supportive dialogue? A Norwegian study. Soc Sci Med 44:519–526PubMedCrossRef Akre V, Falkum E, Hoftvedt BO, Aasland OG (1997) The communication atmosphere between physician colleagues: competitive perfectionism or supportive dialogue? A Norwegian study. Soc Sci Med 44:519–526PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat American Academy of Pediatrics (2003) Family pediatrics: report of the task force on the family. Pediatrics 111:1541–1571 American Academy of Pediatrics (2003) Family pediatrics: report of the task force on the family. Pediatrics 111:1541–1571
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Arlettaz R, Mieth D, Bucher H-U, Duc G, Fauchère J-C (2005) End-of-life decisions in delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr 94:1626–1631PubMedCrossRef Arlettaz R, Mieth D, Bucher H-U, Duc G, Fauchère J-C (2005) End-of-life decisions in delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr 94:1626–1631PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aulisio MP, Arnold RM, Youngner SJ (2000) Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies: a position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values–Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Ann Intern Med 133:59–69PubMedCrossRef Aulisio MP, Arnold RM, Youngner SJ (2000) Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies: a position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values–Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Ann Intern Med 133:59–69PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Aulisio MR (2011) “Facilitated consensus,” “ethics facilitation,” and unsettled cases. J Clin Ethics 22:345–353, author reply 358–362PubMed Aulisio MR (2011) “Facilitated consensus,” “ethics facilitation,” and unsettled cases. J Clin Ethics 22:345–353, author reply 358–362PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann-Hölzle R (2009) “7 Schritte Dialog”—Exemplarische Vertiefung der Methodik einer Fallbesprechung. In: Baumann-Hölzle R, Arn C (eds) Ethiktransfer in Organisationen. EMH/Schwabe, Basel, pp 215–266 Baumann-Hölzle R (2009) “7 Schritte Dialog”—Exemplarische Vertiefung der Methodik einer Fallbesprechung. In: Baumann-Hölzle R, Arn C (eds) Ethiktransfer in Organisationen. EMH/Schwabe, Basel, pp 215–266
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann-Hölzle R, Waldvogel K, Staubli G, Maguire C, Bänziger O, Huber Y, Sennhauser F (2009) Implementierung—“7 Schritte dialog” im Rahmen des Ethik-forums am Kinderspital Zürich. In: Baumann-Hölzle R, Arn C (eds) Ethiktransfer in Organisationen. EMH/Schwabe, Basel, pp 255–266 Baumann-Hölzle R, Waldvogel K, Staubli G, Maguire C, Bänziger O, Huber Y, Sennhauser F (2009) Implementierung—“7 Schritte dialog” im Rahmen des Ethik-forums am Kinderspital Zürich. In: Baumann-Hölzle R, Arn C (eds) Ethiktransfer in Organisationen. EMH/Schwabe, Basel, pp 255–266
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann-Hölzle R, Maffezzoni M, Bucher H (2005) A framework for ethical decision making in neonatal intensive care. Acta Paediatr 94:1777–1783PubMedCrossRef Baumann-Hölzle R, Maffezzoni M, Bucher H (2005) A framework for ethical decision making in neonatal intensive care. Acta Paediatr 94:1777–1783PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Beauchamp TL (2004) Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics? J Law Med Ethics 32:209–217PubMedCrossRef Beauchamp TL (2004) Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics? J Law Med Ethics 32:209–217PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandazzi GF (2008) The European Association for Children in Hospital (EACH) Charter. Pediatrics 121:S97CrossRef Brandazzi GF (2008) The European Association for Children in Hospital (EACH) Charter. Pediatrics 121:S97CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Casarett DJ, Daskal F, Lantos J (1998) The authority of the clinical ethicist. Hastings Cent Rep 28:6–11PubMedCrossRef Casarett DJ, Daskal F, Lantos J (1998) The authority of the clinical ethicist. Hastings Cent Rep 28:6–11PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Bioethics (2001) Institutional ethics committees. Pediatrics 107:205–209CrossRef Committee on Bioethics (2001) Institutional ethics committees. Pediatrics 107:205–209CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Bioethics (2007) Professionalism in pediatrics: statement of principles. Pediatrics 120:895–897CrossRef Committee on Bioethics (2007) Professionalism in pediatrics: statement of principles. Pediatrics 120:895–897CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Hospital Care and Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care (2012) Patient- and family-centered care and the pediatrician’s role. Pediatrics 129:394–404CrossRef Committee on Hospital Care and Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care (2012) Patient- and family-centered care and the pediatrician’s role. Pediatrics 129:394–404CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings CL, Mercurio MR (2010) Ethics for the pediatrician: autonomy, beneficence, and rights. Pediatr Rev 31:252–255PubMedCrossRef Cummings CL, Mercurio MR (2010) Ethics for the pediatrician: autonomy, beneficence, and rights. Pediatr Rev 31:252–255PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R, Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP) (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162:629–633PubMedCrossRef De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R, Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP) (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162:629–633PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubler NN, Webber MP, Swiderski DM (2009) Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. Hastings Cent Rep 39:23–33PubMedCrossRef Dubler NN, Webber MP, Swiderski DM (2009) Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. Hastings Cent Rep 39:23–33PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat DuVal G (2001) What triggers requests for ethics consultations? J Med Ethics 27:24–29CrossRef DuVal G (2001) What triggers requests for ethics consultations? J Med Ethics 27:24–29CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Forde R, Vandvik I (2005) Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee. J Med Ethics 31:73–77PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Forde R, Vandvik I (2005) Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee. J Med Ethics 31:73–77PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Forrow L, Arnold RM, Frader J (1991) Teaching clinical ethics in the residency years: preparing competent professionals. J Med Philos 16:93–112PubMedCrossRef Forrow L, Arnold RM, Frader J (1991) Teaching clinical ethics in the residency years: preparing competent professionals. J Med Philos 16:93–112PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser J, Harris N, Berringer AJ, Prescott H, Finlay F (2010) Advanced care planning in children with life-limiting conditions—the wishes document. Arch Dis Child 95:79–82PubMedCrossRef Fraser J, Harris N, Berringer AJ, Prescott H, Finlay F (2010) Advanced care planning in children with life-limiting conditions—the wishes document. Arch Dis Child 95:79–82PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kesselheim JC, Johnson J, Joffe S (2010) Ethics consultation in children’s hospitals: results from a survey of pediatric clinical ethicists. Pediatrics 125:742–746PubMedCrossRef Kesselheim JC, Johnson J, Joffe S (2010) Ethics consultation in children’s hospitals: results from a survey of pediatric clinical ethicists. Pediatrics 125:742–746PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Larcher V, Hird MF (2002) Withholding and withdrawing neonatal intensive care. Curr Paediatr 12:470–475CrossRef Larcher V, Hird MF (2002) Withholding and withdrawing neonatal intensive care. Curr Paediatr 12:470–475CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat McGee G, Spanogle JP, Caplan AL, Asch DA (2001) A national study of ethics committees. Am J Bioeth 1:60–64PubMedCrossRef McGee G, Spanogle JP, Caplan AL, Asch DA (2001) A national study of ethics committees. Am J Bioeth 1:60–64PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsauer T, Frewer A (2009) Clinical ethics committees and pediatrics. An evaluation of case consultations. Diametros 22:90–104 Ramsauer T, Frewer A (2009) Clinical ethics committees and pediatrics. An evaluation of case consultations. Diametros 22:90–104
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinkamp NL, Gordijn B, Ten Have HAMJ (2008) Debating ethical expertise. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 18:173–192PubMedCrossRef Steinkamp NL, Gordijn B, Ten Have HAMJ (2008) Debating ethical expertise. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 18:173–192PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Street K, Ashcroft R, Henderson J, Campbell AV (2000) The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children’s hospital. J Med Ethics 26:346–352PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Street K, Ashcroft R, Henderson J, Campbell AV (2000) The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children’s hospital. J Med Ethics 26:346–352PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor HA, McDonald EL, Moon M, Hughes MT, Carrese JA (2009) Teaching ethics to paediatrics residents: the centrality of the therapeutic alliance. Med Educ 43:952–959PubMedCrossRef Taylor HA, McDonald EL, Moon M, Hughes MT, Carrese JA (2009) Teaching ethics to paediatrics residents: the centrality of the therapeutic alliance. Med Educ 43:952–959PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaught W (2008) Autonomy and the rights of minors. Autonomy and human rights in health care. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 111–122CrossRef Vaught W (2008) Autonomy and the rights of minors. Autonomy and human rights in health care. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 111–122CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Weisleder P (2008) Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children. J Med Ethics 34:e8PubMedCrossRef Weisleder P (2008) Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children. J Med Ethics 34:e8PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Five-year experience of clinical ethics consultations in a pediatric teaching hospital
verfasst von
Jürg C. Streuli
Georg Staubli
Marlis Pfändler-Poletti
Ruth Baumann-Hölzle
Jörg Ersch
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-013-2221-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

European Journal of Pediatrics 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Pädiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.