Skip to main content
Log in

A modified TNM-7 staging system to better predict the survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (TNM-7) for patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to propose a modified TNM system for better prediction of survival.

Methods

Clinico-pathological data for 1,313 patients who underwent hepatectomy as initial treatment for HCC between 2000 and 2008 were retrieved from a prospective database. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed to evaluate the predictive value.

Results

The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS and DFS of 1,313 patients were 79.2, 55.4, 45.5 %, and 52.6, 36.1, 31.8 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that major vascular invasion was the most important prognostic factor for both OS and DFS, along with tumour number and size. Patients with pT1 and pT2 disease had significantly better OS and DFS than those with pT3 disease (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between pT3a and pT4 (P = 0.552) but patients with pT3b disease had a worse OS and DFS than those with pT4 disease (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively). A modified TNM system within the existing framework was proposed to combine the current pT3a and pT4 together as the new pT3 and to change pT3b to the new pT4. Analysis showed that this modified system had a better prognostic power than either TNM-6 or TNM-7.

Conclusion

TNM-7 would seem to be inaccurate for staging advanced HCC. The modified system can improve both the prognostic accuracy and the hazard discrimination of disease to be consistent among subgroups of HCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S et al (2000) Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology 32(6):1224–1229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruix J, Llovet JM (2009) Major achievements in hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 373(9664):614–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35(3):421–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan SL, Mo FK, Johnson PJ et al (2011) Prospective validation of the Chinese University Prognostic Index and comparison with other staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma in an Asian population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(2):340–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH, Lee CF, Wu TH et al (2011) Evaluation of the new AJCC staging system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 9:114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi KK, Kim SH, Choi SB et al (2011) Portal venous invasion: the single most independent risk factor for immediate postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(11):1646–1651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chun YH, Kim SU, Park JY et al (2011) Prognostic value of the 7th edition of the AJCC staging system as a clinical staging system in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 47(17):2568–2575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR, Bruix J (2010) Current strategy for staging and treatment: the BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis 30(1):61–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JM, Sherman M, Tavill A et al (2003) AHPBA/AJCC consensus conference on staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: consensus statement. HPB (Oxford) 5(4):243–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kee KM, Wang JH, Lee CM et al (2007) Validation of clinical AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 5,613 cases from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Int J Cancer 120(12):2650–2655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kew MC (2012) Hepatocellular carcinoma in developing countries: prevention, diagnosis and treatment. World J Hepatol 4(3):99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau WY, Leung KL, Leung TW et al (1995) Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with diaphragmatic invasion. Br J Surg 82(2):264–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei HJ, Chau GY, Lui WY et al (2006) Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 203(4):426–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Yuan Y, Chen G et al (2010) Application of tumour-node-metastasis staging 2002 version in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: is it predictive of surgical outcome? BMC Cancer 10:535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin MC, Wu CC, Chen JT et al (2005) Surgical results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with gross diaphragmatic invasion. Hepatogastroenterology 52(65):1497–1501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Llovet JM, Bruix J (2000) Prospective validation of the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score: a new prognostic system for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 32(3):679–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodato F, Mazzella G, Festi D et al (2006) Hepatocellular carcinoma prevention: a worldwide emergence between the opulence of developed countries and the economic constraints of developing nations. World J Gastroenterol 12(45):7239–7249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Dong J, Huang Z et al (2008) Comparison of four current staging systems for Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing curative resection: Okuda, CLIP, TNM and CUPI. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(12):1874–1878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marrero JA, Fontana RJ, Barrat A et al (2005) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort. Hepatology 41(4):707–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y et al (2007) Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg 245(6):909–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H et al (1985) Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients. Cancer 56(4):918–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Wong J (2003) Prognosis after hepatic resection for stage IVA hepatocellular carcinoma: a need for reclassification. Ann Surg 237(3):376–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SA, Wei AC, Cleary SP et al (2007) Prognosis and results after resection of very large (> or = 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 11(5):589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shi J, Lai EC, Li N et al (2010) Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombus. Ann Surg Oncol 17(8):2073–2080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobin LH, Compton CC (2010) TNM seventh edition: what’s new, what’s changed: communication from the international union against cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 116(22):5336–5339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minshan Chen.

Additional information

Junting Huang and Yaojun Zhang contributed to this work equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, J., Zhang, Y., Peng, Z. et al. A modified TNM-7 staging system to better predict the survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139, 1709–1719 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1497-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1497-y

Keywords

Navigation