Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dysphagia Following a Total Laryngectomy: The Effect on Quality of Life, Functioning, and Psychological Well-Being

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect that dysphagia has on quality of life (QoL), functioning, and psychological well-being of people who have undergone a total laryngectomy. A questionnaire battery was sent to all members (N = 197) of the Laryngectomee Association of NSW, Australia. QoL and functioning were assessed using the World Health Organisation Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQoL-Bref) and the University of Washington QoL (UW-QoL) measures. Psychological well-being was measured using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS). One hundred ten questionnaires (56%) were completed and returned. There were no significant differences in QoL, as measured by the WHOQoL-Bref, between those laryngectomees with and without dysphagia. Laryngectomees with dysphagia, however, had significantly impaired functioning and markedly reduced social participation as measured by the UW-QoL. Significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety were also documented in those laryngectomees who had dysphagia. Dysphagia may not necessarily determine QoL following a total laryngectomy. However, it may have a negative impact on functioning and on psychological well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Impairment: “problems in body function or structure such as a significant deviation or loss” [5, p. 11].

  2. Activity limitation: “difficulties an individual may have in executing activities” [5, p. 11].

  3. Participation restriction: “problems an individual may experience in involvement in life situations” [5, p. 11].

  4. Convergent validity: “concerned with demonstrating that two independent methods of inferring an attribute lead to similar ends” [18, pp. 92–94].

  5. Predictive validity: “concerns using an instrument to estimate some criterion behaviour that is external to the measuring instrument itself” [18, pp. 92–94].

References

  1. Murphy BA, Ridner S, Wells N, Dietrich M. Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007;62(3):251–67. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morton RP, Izzard ME. Quality of life outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. World J Surg. 2003;27(7):884–9. doi:10.1007/s00268-003-7117-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO-QoL Group. The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (The WHO-QoL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W, editors. Quality of life assessment: international perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1994. p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell BH, Marbella A, Layde PM. Quality of life and recurrence concern in survivors of head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(6):895–906. doi:10.1097/00005537-200006000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. ICF World Health Organisation, International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. In: Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO, 2002. p. 11.

  6. List MA, Bilir SP. Functional outcomes in head and neck cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14(2):178–89. doi:10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holloway RL, Hellewell JL, Marbella AM, Layde PM, Myers KB, Campbell BH. Psychological effects in long-term head and neck cancer survivors. Head Neck. 2005;27:281–8. doi:10.1002/hed.20147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weymuller EA, Yueh B, Deleyiannis FW, Kunz AL, Alsarraf R, Coltera MD. Quality of life in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(3):4–7. doi:10.1097/00005537-200003002-00002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. List MA, Siston A, Haraf D, Schumm P, Kies M, Stenson K, et al. Quality of life and performance in advanced head and neck cancer patients on concomitant chemoradiotherapy: a prospective examination. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):1020–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Armstrong E, Isman K, Dooley P, Brine D, Riley N, Dentice R, et al. An investigation into the quality of life of individuals after laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2001;23:16–24. doi:10.1002/1097-0347(200101)23:1<16::AID-HED3>3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen NP, Mottz CC, Frank C, Vos P, Smith HJ, Karlsson U, et al. Dysphagia following chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(3):383–8. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ward EC, Bishop B, Frisby J, Stevens M. Swallowing outcomes following laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:181–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheesman AD. Surgical management of the patient. In: Edels Y, editor. Laryngectomy: diagnosis to rehabilitation. London: Croom Helm; 1983. p. 42–3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maclean J, Cotton S, Perry A. Postlaryngectomy: it’s hard to swallow. An Australian study of prevalence and self-reports of swallowing function after undergoing a total laryngectomy. Dysphagia. 2009;24.

  15. Balfe DM. Dysphagia after laryngeal surgery: radiologic assessment. Dysphagia. 1990;5:20–34. doi:10.1007/BF02407390.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowe D, Rogers S. University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QoL v.4). Guidance for scoring and presentation. Available at http://www.bahno.org.uk/docs/UW-QOL-BAHNO-update.doc. Accessed May 25, 2008.

  17. Rogers SN, Gwanne S, Lowe D, Humphris G, Yueh B, Weymuller E. The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale. Head Neck. 2002;24:521–9. doi:10.1002/hed.10106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 92–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychological Foundation; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy B, Hermann H, Hawthorne G, Pinzone T, Evert H. Australian WHOQOL Instruments: user’s manual and interpretation guide. Melbourne, Australia: Australian WHOQOL Field Study Centre; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lazarus CL, Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Colangelo LA, Kahrilas PJ, Mittal B, et al. Swallowing disorders in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Laryngoscope. 1996;106(9):1157–66. doi:10.1097/00005537-199609000-00021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This paper is part of a wider research study that is generously funded through the Laryngectomee Association of NSW as part of Julia Maclean’s PhD studies at La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Maclean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maclean, J., Cotton, S. & Perry, A. Dysphagia Following a Total Laryngectomy: The Effect on Quality of Life, Functioning, and Psychological Well-Being. Dysphagia 24, 314–321 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9209-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9209-0

Keywords

Navigation