nach oben

Dysphagia

Erschienen in:

08.02.2020 | Original Article

Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Kannada Version of EAT 10

verfasst von: Rahul Krishnamurthy, Radish Kumar Balasubramanium, Prasanna Suresh Hegde

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Eating Assessment Tool 10 is a symptom survey and has several advantages over other existing questionnaires. The instrument has also proven to be useful in establishing initial dysphagia symptom severity and to aid in measuring treatment outcomes. Due to its wide applicability, the instrument has been translated into several languages. The aim of the present study was to translate and validate the Kannada version of Eating Assessment Tool 10.

Method

88 individuals with dysphagia and equal number of healthy individuals filled the Kannada version of Eating Assessment Tool. Internal consistency and test–retest reproducibility were used for reliability testing. Validity was also established by comparing the scores of dysphagia patients and healthy controls.

Results

The overall Cronbach’s α for the tool was 0.9 indicating a good internal consistency. The internal consistency of each of the items was also high, and ranged 0.88 to 0.9. Twenty patients filled the questionnaire after a span of 48 h, and the ICC coefficient was found to be 0.89 indicating a high reliability. The control group has significantly lower scores for all scales when compared to the dysphagia group [t(174) = 78.41, p < 0.001].

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that the Kannada version of EAT 10 has good internal consistency, test retest reliability, and concurrent validity. The results of the study also reveal that it is a reliable and valid tool for screening dysphagia population.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Campbell BH, Spinelli K, Marbella AM, Myers KB, Kuhn JC, Layde PM. Aspiration, weight loss, and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(9):1100–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.9.1100.CrossRefPubMed

Nguyen NP, Frank C, Moltz CC, Vos P, Smith HJ, Karlsson U, et al. Impact of dysphagia on quality of life after treatment of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(3):772–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.017.CrossRef

Rofes L, Arreola V, Mukherjee R, Clavé P. Sensitivity and specificity of the Eating assessment tool and the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(9):1256–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Timmerman AA, Speyer R, Heijnen BJ, Klijn-Zwijnenberg IR. Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2014;29(2):183–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9511-8.CrossRefPubMed

Altman KW, Yu GP, Schaefer SD. Consequence of dysphagia in the hospitalized patient: impact on prognosis and hospital resources. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(8):784–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.129.CrossRefPubMed

Patel DA, Krishnaswami S, Steger E, Conover E, Vaezi MF, Ciucci MR, Francis DO. Economic and survival burden of dysphagia among inpatients in the United States. Dis Esophagus. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dox131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cordier R, Speyer R, Chen Y-W, Wilkes-Gillan S, Brown T, Bourke-Taylor H, et al. Evaluating the psychometric quality of social skills measures: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dwivedi RC, Rose SS, Roe JWG, Khan AS, Pepper C, Nutting CM, et al. Validation of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) in a cohort of head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(4):e10–e1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.004.CrossRefPubMed

Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(12):919–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Plowman EK, Tabor LC, Robison R, Gaziano J, Dion C, Watts SA, et al. Discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 to detect aspiration in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;28(1):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Cheney DM, Siddiqui MT, Litts JK, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. The ability of the 10-Item eating assessment tool (EAT-10) to predict aspiration risk in persons with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014;124(5):351–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489414558107.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, Ceriani E, Atac M, Jukic-Peladic N, et al. Reliability and validity of the italian eating assessment tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(11):717–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941312201109.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Burgos R, Sarto B, Segurola H, Romagosa A, Puiggros C, Vazquez C, et al. Translation and validation of the spanish version of the eating assessment tool-10 (eat-10) for the screening of dysphagia. Clin Nutr Suppl. 2011;6(1):167. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1744-1161(11)70431-8.CrossRef

14.

Nogueira DS, Ferreira PL, Reis EA, Lopes IS. Measuring outcomes for dysphagia: validity and reliability of the european portuguese eating assessment tool (P-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2015;30(5):511–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Demir N, Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, Karaduman AA. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool (T-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):644–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9723-9.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Wild D, Eremenco S, Mear I, Martin M, Houchin C, Gawlicki M, et al. Multinational trials—recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: the ISPOR patient-reported outcomes translation and linguistic validation good research practices task force report. Value Health. 2009;12(4):430–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rahul K, Swapna N, Resmitha R, Jyotsna K. Comparison between automatic and volitional swallow in healthy individuals using tongue array and cervical auscultation modules. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(4):520–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01699-7.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kumar RB, Bhat JS. Manipal manual for swallowing assessment. Manipal: Manipal University Press; 2012.

19.

Balasubramanium RK, Bhat JS. Efficacy of manipal manual of swallowing assessment in identifying aspiration. Int J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 2015;3(2):82–92.CrossRef

20.

Fink TA, Ross JB. Are we testing a true thin liquid? Dysphagia. 2009;24(3):285–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9203-y.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):93–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00417897.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Wilmskoetter J, Bonilha H, Hong I, Hazelwood RJ, Martin-Harris B, Velozo C. Construct validity of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Disabil Rehabil. 2017;41(5):549–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Cordier R, Joosten A, Clavé P, Schindler A, Bülow M, Demir N, et al. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) using rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2016;32(2):250–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9754-2.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Kannada Version of EAT 10
verfasst von: Rahul Krishnamurthy
Radish Kumar Balasubramanium
Prasanna Suresh Hegde
Publikationsdatum: 08.02.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Dysphagia / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10094-2

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Kannada Version of EAT 10

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Correction to: An Exploratory Study of Hyoid Visibility, Position, and Swallowing-Related Displacement in a Pediatric Population

Handheld Cough Testing: A Novel Tool for Cough Assessment and Dysphagia Screening

A Systematic Review of the Influence of Bolus Characteristics on Respiratory Measures in Healthy Swallowing

Drooling in Parkinson’s Disease: Prevalence and Progression from the Non-motor International Longitudinal Study

Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) and Reduced Tongue Pressure in Relation to Atherosclerosis Among Community-Dwelling Elderly Japanese Men: A Cross-Sectional Study

Swallow Safety in Infant Pigs With and Without Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Lesion

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO