Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Conversion to open cholecystectomy is still required in some patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative factors associated with conversion to open cholecystectomy in elective cholecystectomy and acute cholecystitis.

Methods

The records of 1,804 patients who underwent cholecystectomy from May 1992 to January 2004 were reviewed retrospectively. The demographics and preoperative data of patients who required conversion to laparotomy were compared to those with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results

Conversion to open cholecystectomy was needed in 94 patients (5.2%),of which 44 (2.8%) had no inflammation and 50 (18.4%) had acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Male gender, age older than 60 years, previous upper abdominal surgery, diabetes, and severity of inflammation were all significantly correlated with an increased conversion rate to laparotomy. Also, the conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis patients was associated with greater white blood cell count, fever, elevated total bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase levels, and the various types of inflammation.

Conclusions

None of these risk factors were contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This may help predict the difficulty of the procedure and permit the surgeon to better inform patients about the risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Alponat CK Kum BC Koh A Rajnakova PM Goh (1997) ArticleTitlePredictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy World J Surg 21 629–633 Occurrence Handle9230661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. G Berci JM Sackier (1991) ArticleTitleThe Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 382–384 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90602-A Occurrence Handle1825762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A Bickel A Rappaport V Kanievski I Vaksman M Haj N Geron A Eitan (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis: prognostic factors for success Surg Endosc 10 1045–1049 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900237 Occurrence Handle8881049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. R Bittner (2004) ArticleTitleThe standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Langenbecks Arch Surg 389 157–163 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00423-004-0471-1 Occurrence Handle15188083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. A Cuschieri F Dubois J Mouiel P Mouret H Becker G Buess M Trede H Troidl (1991) ArticleTitleThe European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 385–387 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-B Occurrence Handle1825763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DD Deizel KW Millikan SG Economou A Doolas S-T Ko MC Airan (1993) ArticleTitleComplications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604 cases Am J Surg 165 9–14 Occurrence Handle8418705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. CA Del Pin ParticleDel KS Arthur C Honig EM Silverman (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: relationship of pathology and operative time JSLS 6 149–154 Occurrence Handle12113419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. S Eldar HT Siegelnann D Buzaglo I Matter A Cohen E Sabo J Abrahamson (2002) ArticleTitleConversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: artificial neural networks improve the prediction of conversion World J Surg 26 79–85 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-001-0185-2 Occurrence Handle11898038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GM Fried JS Barkun HH Sigman L Joseph D Clas J Garzon EJ Hinchey JL Meakins (1994) ArticleTitleFactors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 167 35–39 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(94)90051-5 Occurrence Handle8311138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. LE Hammarstrom S Mellander H Rudstrom (2001) ArticleTitleA prognostic index of unsuccessful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis Int J Surg Invest 2 387–392

    Google Scholar 

  11. CH Hutchinson LW Traverse FT Lee (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Do preoperative factors predict the need to convert to open? Surg Endosc 8 875–878 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00843458 Occurrence Handle7992153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. S Kanaan K Murayama L Merriam L Dawes J Prystowsky R Rege R Joehl (2002) ArticleTitleRisk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy J Surg Res 106 20–24 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jsre.2002.6393 Occurrence Handle12127803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C-K Kum E Eypasch R Lefering D Math A Paul E Neugebauer H Troidl (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Is it really safe? World J Surg 20 43–49 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900008 Occurrence Handle8588411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. PB Lai KH Kwong KL Leung SP Kwok AC Chan SC Chung WY Lau (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 85 764–767 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x Occurrence Handle9667702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. CM Lo CL Liu ECS Lai ST Fan J Wong (1996) ArticleTitleEarly versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 223 37–42 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199601000-00006 Occurrence Handle8554416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. JA Lujan P Parrilla R Robles JA Torralba J Garcia Ayllon R Liron F Sanchez- Bueno (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis J Am Coll Surg 181 75–77 Occurrence Handle7599776

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. B Navez D Mutter Y Russier M Vix F Jamali D Lipski E Cambler P Guiot J Leroy J Marescaux (2001) ArticleTitleSafety of laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 609 cases World J Surg 25 1352–1356 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-001-0122-4 Occurrence Handle11596902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. JH Peter W Krailadsiri R Incarbone CG Bremner E Froes AP Ireland P Crookes AE Ortega GA Anthone SA Stain (1994) ArticleTitleReasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in an urban teaching hospital Am J Surg 168 555–559 Occurrence Handle7977995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. K Prakash G Jacob V Lekha A Venugopal B Venugopal H Ramesh (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Factors associated with conversion SurgEndosc 16 180–183

    Google Scholar 

  20. DW Rattner C Ferguson AL Warshaw (1993) ArticleTitleFactors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 217 233–236 Occurrence Handle8452401

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. M Rosen F Brody J Ponsky (2002) ArticleTitlePredictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 184 254–258 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00934-0 Occurrence Handle12354595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. JR Sanabria S Gallinger R Croxford SM Strasberg (1994) ArticleTitleRisk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy J Am Coll Surg 179 696–704 Occurrence Handle7952482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. P Schrenk R Woisetschlager WU Wayand (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cause of conversion in 1300 patients and analysis of risk factors Surg Endosc 9 25–28 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00187880 Occurrence Handle7725209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. H Seeliger A Fürst C Zülke KW Jauch (2002) ArticleTitleSurgical management of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis and follow-up of 28 cases Langenbecks Arch Surg 387 286–293 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00423-002-0330-x Occurrence Handle12447554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. InstitutionalAuthorNameSouthernSurgeons Club (1991) ArticleTitleA prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies N Engl J Med 334 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  26. M Suter A Meyer (2001) ArticleTitleA 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Is it safe? Surg Endosc 15 1187–1192 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640090098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A Zisman R Gold-Deutch E Zisman M Nefri Z Halpern G Lin A Halevy (1996) ArticleTitleIs male gender a risk factor for conversion of laparoscopic into open cholecystectomy? Surg Endosc 10 892–894 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900191 Occurrence Handle8703145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Polychronidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simopoulos, C., Botaitis, S., Polychronidis, A. et al. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19, 905–909 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2197-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2197-0

Keywords

Navigation