Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2005

01.03.2005 | Original article

Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

verfasst von: W. L. Law, Y. M. Lee, K. W. Chu

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Previous abdominal surgery has been regarded as a relative contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. However, studies on laparoscopic cholecystectomy have showed that the presence of prior abdominal procedures does not affect the outcomes of surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

This study enrolled 295 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery from May 2000 to May 2003. The patients were divided into two groups: those with previous abdominal surgery (n = 84) and those without a prior operation (n = 211). The outcomes of surgery for the two groups were compared with respect to the duration of surgery, blood loss, conversion rate, time to return of bowel function, resumption of diet, complications, and the hospital stay.

Results

The study included 158 men and 137 women. The median age of the patients was 70 years (range, 33-91 years). Significantly more female patients and patients with benign diseases had prior abdominal surgery. Conversion was required for 17.8% of the patients with and 11.4% of the patients without previous surgery (p = 0.181). There were no differences in the operating time or blood loss between the two groups. The time to bowel movement and resumption of diet were similar in the two groups. The median hospital stay was 7 days for both groups. Of the 39 conversions, 28.2% were necessitated mainly by the presence of adhesions. In the patients who underwent conversion because of adhesions (n = 11), nine had prior surgery and two did not (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The presence of prior surgery does not affect the operating time or blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The conversion rate is not increased for patients with prior surgery. The postoperative outcomes in terms of ileus, complication rate, and hospital stay are not worse for patients with prior surgery. Previous abdominal surgery should not be considered as a contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group2004A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancerN Engl J Med35020502059 Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group2004A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancerN Engl J Med35020502059
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck, DE, Ferguson, MA, Opelka, FG, Fleshman, JW, Gervaz, P, Wexner, SD 2000Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening timeDis Colon Rectum4317491753PubMed Beck, DE, Ferguson, MA, Opelka, FG, Fleshman, JW, Gervaz, P, Wexner, SD 2000Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening timeDis Colon Rectum4317491753PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman, MG, McLain, AD, Moran, BJ 2000Impact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomyDis Colon Rectum4312971299PubMed Coleman, MG, McLain, AD, Moran, BJ 2000Impact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomyDis Colon Rectum4312971299PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Diez, J, Delbene, R, Ferreres, A 1998The feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgeryHPB Surg10353356PubMed Diez, J, Delbene, R, Ferreres, A 1998The feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgeryHPB Surg10353356PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwivedi, A, Chahin, F, Agrawal, S, Chau, WY, Tootla, A, Tootla, F, Silva, YJ 2002Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular diseaseDis Colon Rectum4513091314PubMed Dwivedi, A, Chahin, F, Agrawal, S, Chau, WY, Tootla, A, Tootla, F, Silva, YJ 2002Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular diseaseDis Colon Rectum4513091314PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, H 1997The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstructionEur J Surg Suppl577 59PubMed Ellis, H 1997The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstructionEur J Surg Suppl577 59PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, H, Moran, BJ, Thompson, JN, Parker, MC, Wilson, MS, Menzies, D, McGuire, A, Lower, AM, Hawthorn, RJ, O’Brien, F, Buchan, S, Crowe, AM 1999Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort studyLancet35314761480CrossRefPubMed Ellis, H, Moran, BJ, Thompson, JN, Parker, MC, Wilson, MS, Menzies, D, McGuire, A, Lower, AM, Hawthorn, RJ, O’Brien, F, Buchan, S, Crowe, AM 1999Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort studyLancet35314761480CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamel, CT, Pikarsky, AJ, Weiss, E, Nogueras, J, Wexner, SD 2000Do prior abdominal operations alter the outcome of laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy?Surg Endosc14853857CrossRefPubMed Hamel, CT, Pikarsky, AJ, Weiss, E, Nogueras, J, Wexner, SD 2000Do prior abdominal operations alter the outcome of laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy?Surg Endosc14853857CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, Castells, A, Taura, P, Pique, JM, Visa, J 2002Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trialLancet35922242229PubMed Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, Castells, A, Taura, P, Pique, JM, Visa, J 2002Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trialLancet35922242229PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Law, WL, Chu, KW, Tung, PH 2002Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patientsJ Am Coll Surg195768773CrossRefPubMed Law, WL, Chu, KW, Tung, PH 2002Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patientsJ Am Coll Surg195768773CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Law, WL, Lo, CY, Chu, KW 2001Emergency surgery for colonic diverticulitis: differences between right-sided and left-sided lesionsInt J Colorectal Dis16280284CrossRefPubMed Law, WL, Lo, CY, Chu, KW 2001Emergency surgery for colonic diverticulitis: differences between right-sided and left-sided lesionsInt J Colorectal Dis16280284CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumley, J, Stitz, R, Stevenson, A, Fielding, G, Luck, A 2002Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomesDis Colon Rectum45867872CrossRefPubMed Lumley, J, Stitz, R, Stevenson, A, Fielding, G, Luck, A 2002Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomesDis Colon Rectum45867872CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Menzies, D, Ellis, H 1990Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem?Ann R Coll Surg Engl726063PubMed Menzies, D, Ellis, H 1990Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem?Ann R Coll Surg Engl726063PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, K, Holbling, N, Hutter, J, Junger, W, Moritz, E, Speil, T 1993Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who have had previous abdominal surgerySurg Endosc7400403CrossRefPubMed Miller, K, Holbling, N, Hutter, J, Junger, W, Moritz, E, Speil, T 1993Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who have had previous abdominal surgerySurg Endosc7400403CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Milsom, JW, Bohm, B, Hammerhofer, KA, Fazio, V, Steiger, E, Elson, P 1998A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary reportJ Am Coll Surg1874654PubMed Milsom, JW, Bohm, B, Hammerhofer, KA, Fazio, V, Steiger, E, Elson, P 1998A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary reportJ Am Coll Surg1874654PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Parsons, JK, Jarrett, TJ, Chow, GK, Kavoussi, LR 2002The effect of previous abdominal surgery on urological laparoscopyJ Urol16823872390CrossRefPubMed Parsons, JK, Jarrett, TJ, Chow, GK, Kavoussi, LR 2002The effect of previous abdominal surgery on urological laparoscopyJ Urol16823872390CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiedeck, TH, Schwandner, O, Baca, I, Baehrlehner, E, Konradt, J, Kockerling, F, Kuthe, A, Buerk, C, Herold, A, Bruch, HP 2000Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center studyDis Colon Rectum4318PubMed Schiedeck, TH, Schwandner, O, Baca, I, Baehrlehner, E, Konradt, J, Kockerling, F, Kuthe, A, Buerk, C, Herold, A, Bruch, HP 2000Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center studyDis Colon Rectum4318PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schirmer, BD, Dix, J, Schmieg, RE,Jr, Aguilar, M, Urch, S 1995The impact of previous abdominal surgery on outcome following laparoscopic cholecystectomySurg Endosc910851089CrossRefPubMed Schirmer, BD, Dix, J, Schmieg, RE,Jr, Aguilar, M, Urch, S 1995The impact of previous abdominal surgery on outcome following laparoscopic cholecystectomySurg Endosc910851089CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shore, G, Gonzalez, QH, Bondora, A, Vickers, SM 2003Laparoscopic vs conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn diseaseArch Surg1387679PubMed Shore, G, Gonzalez, QH, Bondora, A, Vickers, SM 2003Laparoscopic vs conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn diseaseArch Surg1387679PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Krabben, AA, Dijkstra, FR, Nieuwenhuijzen, M, Reijnen, MM, Schaapveld, M, Goor, H 2000Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomyBr J Surg87467471CrossRefPubMed Krabben, AA, Dijkstra, FR, Nieuwenhuijzen, M, Reijnen, MM, Schaapveld, M, Goor, H 2000Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomyBr J Surg87467471CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weibel, MA, Majno, G 1973Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: a postmortem studyAm J Surg126345353PubMed Weibel, MA, Majno, G 1973Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: a postmortem studyAm J Surg126345353PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner, SD, Moscovitz, ID 2000Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s diseaseSurg Clin North Am8012991319CrossRefPubMed Wexner, SD, Moscovitz, ID 2000Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s diseaseSurg Clin North Am8012991319CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wongworawat, MD, Aitken, DR, Robles, AE, Garberoglio, C 1994The impact of prior intraabdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomyAm Surg60763766PubMed Wongworawat, MD, Aitken, DR, Robles, AE, Garberoglio, C 1994The impact of prior intraabdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomyAm Surg60763766PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Young-Fadok, TM, HallLong, K, McConnell, EJ, Gomez, RG, Cabanela, RL 2001Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costsSurg Endosc15450454PubMed Young-Fadok, TM, HallLong, K, McConnell, EJ, Gomez, RG, Cabanela, RL 2001Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costsSurg Endosc15450454PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu, SC, Chen, SC, Wang, SM, Wei, TC 1994Is previous abdominal surgery a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy?J Laparoendosc Surg43135PubMed Yu, SC, Chen, SC, Wang, SM, Wei, TC 1994Is previous abdominal surgery a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy?J Laparoendosc Surg43135PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery
verfasst von
W. L. Law
Y. M. Lee
K. W. Chu
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2005
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8114-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.