Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgical Endoscopy
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2005

01.05.2005 | Review/Meta-analysis

Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

verfasst von: R. Bittner, S. Sauerland, C.-G. Schmedt

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We performed a scientific evaluation of the efficacy of different surgical techniques for inginual hernia repair and supported our findings by conducting a systematic review of randomized studies comparing endoscopic with open nonmesh suture techniques.

Methods

After an extensive search of the literature, a total of 27 studies (41 publications) with evidence level lb were identified. These studies randomly compared endoscopic with open nonmesh suturing techniques. The quality of data sufficed to enable a quantitative meta-analysis of various parameters using the original software of the Cochrane Collaboration. Due to its superiority in comparison to other open nonmesh suturing techniques, the Shouldice repair technique was analyzed separately.

Results

The systematic comparison of endoscopic techniques with the Shouldice repair showed that these techniques had significant advantages in terms of the following parameters: total morbidity, hematoma, nerve injury, and pain-associated parameters such as time to return to work, and chronic groin pain. The Shouldice operation has the advantages of a shorter operating time and a lower incidence of wound seroma. There was no difference regarding the incidence of major complications, wound infection, testicular atrophy, or hernia recurrence. Open non-Shouldice suturing techniques are associated with higher recurrence rates and more wound infections than endoscopic operations.

Conclusion

In comparison to open nonmesh suture repair techniques, endoscopic repair techniques have significant advantages in terms of pain-associated parameters. For the revaluation of long-term complications such as hernia recurrence and chronic groin pain, further clinical examination of the existing study collectives is needed.
Literatur
1.
McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PMNYH, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Wiley, Chichester. (UK).
2.
Grant, AM Hernia EU Trialists Collaboration2002Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient dataHernia6210European Hernia Trialists CollaborationPubMed
3.
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration2002Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: metaanalysis of randomized controlled trialsAnn Surg235322332
4.
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration2000Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trialsBr J Surg87860867
5.
Stylopoulos, N, Gazell, GS, Rattner, DW 2003A cost-utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patientsSurg Endosc17180189PubMed
6.
Voyles, CR, Hamilton, BJ, Johnson, WD, Kano, N 2002Meta-analyses of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with perperitoneal mesh prosthesisAm J Surg184610PubMed
7.
Schmedt, CG, Leibl, BJ, Bittner, R 2002Endoscopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with Shouldice and Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review of randomized trialsDig Surg19511517PubMed
8.
Fingerhut, A, Millat, B, Bataille, N, Yachouchi, E, Dziri, C, Boudet, MJ, Paul, A 2001) Laparoscopic hernia repair in 2000: update of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S) consensus conference in Madrid, June 1994Surg Endosc1510611065PubMed
9.
Leibl, BJ, Schmedt, CG, Ulrich, M, Kraft, K, Bittner, R 1999Laparoscopic hernia repair—the facts, but no fashion LangenbecksArch Surg384302311
10.
Chung, RS, Rowland, DY 1999Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic vs conventional inguinal hernia repairsSurg Endosc13689694PubMed
11.
Cheek, CM, Black, NA, Devlin, HB, Kingsnorth, AN, Taylor, RS, Watkin, DFL 1998Groin hernia surgery: a systematic reviewAnn R Coll Surg Engl80xxxx
12.
Krähenbühl, L, Schäfer, M, Feodorovici, MA, Büchler, MW 1998Laparoscopic, hernia surgery: an overviewDig Surg15158166PubMed
13.
Go PMNYH1998Overview of randomized trials in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairSemin Laparosc Surg5238241
14.
Macintyre, IMC, Miles, WFA 1995Critical appraisal and current position of laparoscopic hernia repairJ R Coll Surg Edinb40 331336
15.
MacFadyen, BV,Jr, Mathis, CR 1994Inguinal herniorrhaphy: complications and recurrencesSemin Laparosc Surg1128140PubMed
16.
Tschudi, JF, Wagner, M, Klaiber, C, Brugger, J-J, Frei, E, Krähenbühl, L, Inderbitzi, R,  et al. 2001Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice repairSurg Endosc1512631266Aarberg 1996PubMed
17.
Tschudi, JF, Wagner, M, Klaiber, C, Brugger, J-J, Frei, E, Krähenbühl, L, Inderbitzi, R,  et al. 1996Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphSurg Endosc10845847PubMed
18.
Zieren, J, Zieren, HU, Jacobi, CA, Wenger, FA, Müller, JM 1998Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice’s operationAm J Surg175330333PubMed
19.
Zieren, J, Zieren, HU, Said, S, Müller, JM 1996Laparoscopic or conventional inguinal hernia repair with or without implant. A prospective randomized study Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd113609610PubMed
20.
Köninger, JS, Oster, M, Butters, M 1998Leistenhernienversorgung — ein Vergleich gängiger VerfahrenChirurg6913401344PubMed
21.
Decker, D, Lindemann, C, Springer, W, Low, A, Hirner, A, Ruecker, A 1999Endoscopic versus conventional hernia repair from immunologic point of viewSurg Endosc13335339PubMed
22.
Nathanson, L, Adib, R, Braniki, F 1996Randomized trial of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair [Abstract]Surg Endosc10192
23.
Damamme, A, Samama, G, D’Alche-Gautier, MJ, Chanavel, N, Bréfort, JL, Le Roux, Y 1998Evaluation médico-économique de la cure de hernie inguinale: Shouldice vs laparoscopieAnn Chir521116PubMed
24.
Kald, A, Anderberg, B, Carlsson, P, Park, PO, Smedh, K 1997Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomized prospective trial with one year follow-upEur J Surg163505510PubMed
25.
Schrenk, P, Woisetschläger, R, Rieger, R, Wayand, W 1996Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repairBr J Surg8315631566
26.
Schrenk, P, Bettelheim, P, Woisetschläger, R, Rieger, R, Wayand, WU 1996Metabolic responses after laparoscopic or open hernia repairSurg Endosc10628632PubMed
27.
Lorenz, D, Stark, E, Oestreich, K, Richter, A 2000Laparoscopic hernioplasty versus conventional hernioplasty (Shouldice): results of a prospective randomized trialWorld J Surg24739746PubMed
28.
Fleming, WR, Elliott, TB, Jones, RM, Hardy, KJ 2001Randomized clinical trial comparing totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with the Shouldice techniqueBr J Surg8811831188
29.
Juul, P, Christensen, K 1999Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repairBr J Surg86316319
30.
Champault, G, Benoít, J, Lauroy, J, Rizk, N, Boutelier, P 1994Hernies de l’aine de l’adultel: chirurgie laparoscopique vs opération de ShouldiceAnn Chir4810031008PubMed
31.
Benoit, J, Champault, G, Lauroy, J, Rizk, N, Boutelier, P 1994Traitement laparoscopique des hernies de l’aine: evaluation de la douleur postoperatoire: voie pre-peritoneal pure vs operation de ShouldiceChirurgie120455459PubMed
32.
Rizk, N, Champault, G, Lauroy, J, Benoit, J, Boutelier, P 1994Laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of 242 casesBr J Surg 81.7071
33.
Champault, G, Barrat, C, Catheline, JM, Rizk, N 1998Hernies de l’aine: résultats à 4 ans de deux études prospectives randomisées comparant les opérations de Shouldice et de Stoppa à l’abord laparoscopique totalement pré-péritiónealAnn Chir52132136PubMed
34.
Champault, GG, Rizk, N, Catheline, JM, Turner, R, Boutelier, P 1997Inguinal hernia repair. Totally preperitoneal laparoscopic approach versus stoppa operation: Randomized trial of 100 casesSurg Laparosc Endosc7445450PubMed
35.
Champault, G, Rizk, N, Catheline, JM, Riskalla, H, Boutelier, P 1996Groin hernia: pre-peritoneal laparoscopic sugery versus open (Stoppa) procedure. Prospective randomized trial: 100 casesJ Chir (Paris)133274280
36.
Leibl, BJ, Däubler, P, Schmedt, CG, Kraft, K, Bittner, R 2000Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and Shouldice repairBr J Surg87780783
37.
Leibl, BJ, Däubler, P, Schwarz, J, Ulrich, M, Bittner, R 1995Standardisierte laparoskopische Hernioplastik vs. Shouldice-RepairChirurg66895898PubMed
38.
Berndsen, F, Arvidsson, D, Enander, LK, Leijonmarck, CE, Wingren, U, Rudberg, C, Smedberg, S,  et al. 2002Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patientsHernia65661PubMed
39.
Hauters, P, Meunier, D, Urgyan, S, Jouret, JC, Janssen, P, Nys, JM 1996Etude prospective controlée comparant laparoscopie et Shouldice dans le traitement de la hernie inguinale unilatéraleAnn Chir50776781PubMed
40.
Kunz, R, Schwarz, A, Beger, HG 1993Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair versus Shouldice herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a prospectively randomised trialChir Endosc71213
41.
Kunz, R, Schwarz, A, Beger, HG 1994Laparoscopic inguinal (TAPP) hernioplasty versus Shouldice hernioplasty: preliminary results of a prospectively randomized study [Abstract]Surg Endosc8485
42.
Bessell, JR, Baxter, P, Riddell, P, Watkin, S, Maddern, GJ 1996A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair as a day surgical procedureSurg Endosc10495500PubMed
43.
Rudkin, GE, Maddern, GJ 1995Peri-operative outcome for day-case laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairAnaesthesia50586589Adelaide 1994PubMed
44.
Maddern, GJ, Rudkin, G, Bessell, JR, Devitt, P, Ponte, L 1994A comparison of laparoscopic and open hernia repair as a day surgical procedureSurg Endosc814041408PubMed
45.
Tanphiphat, C, Tanprayoon, T, Sangsubhan, C, Chatamra, K 1998Laparoscopic vs-open inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, controlled trialSurg Endosc12846851PubMed
46.
Liem, MSL, Graaf, Y, Steensel, CJ, Boelhouwer, RU, Clevers, WF, Schrijvers, AJP, Vroonhoven, TJMV 1997Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repairN Engl J Med33615411547PubMed
47.
Liem, MSL, Halsema, JAM, Graaf, Y, Schrijvers, AJP, Vroonhoven, TJMV 1997Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphyAnn Surg226668676CrossRefPubMed
48.
Liem, MSL, Graaf, Y, Zwart, RC, Geurts, I, Vroonhoven, TJMV 1997A randomized comparison of physical performance following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairBr J Surg846467
49.
Vatansev, C, Belviranli, M, Aksoy, F, Tuncer, S, Sahin, M, Karahan, O 2002The effects of different hernia repair methods on postoperative pain medication and CRP levelsSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech12243246PubMed
50.
Dirksen, CD, Beets, GL, Go, PMNYH, Geisler, GEA, Baeten, CGMI, Kootstra, G 1998Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomized controlled trialEur J Surg164439446PubMed
51.
Lawrence, K, McWhinnie, D, Jenkinson, C, Coulter, A 1997Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairAnn R Coll Surg Engl794045
52.
Lawrence, K, McWhinnie, D, Goodwin, A, Gray, A, Gordon, J, Storie, J, Britton, J, Collin, J 1996An economic evaluation of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repairJ Public Health Med184148PubMed
53.
Lawrence, K, McWhinnie, D, Goodwin, A, Gray, A, Gordon, J, Storie, J, Britton, J,  et al. 1995Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early resultsBMJ311981985PubMed
54.
Johansson, B, Hallerbäck, B, Glise, H, Anesten, B, Smedberg, S, Román, J 1999Laparoscopic versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study)Ann Surg230225231PubMed
55.
Johansson, B, Hallerbäck, B, Glise, H, Anesten, B, Melen, K, Holm, J, Bergmann, B 1997Laparoscopic versus open repair W/WO mesh graft for inguinal hernia repair: (SCUR Hernia Repair Study)Surg Endosc11170[abstract]
56.
Pavlidis, TE, Atmatzidis, KS, Lazaridis, CN, Papaziogas, BT, Makris, JG, Papaziogas, TB 2002Comparison between modern mesh and conventional mesh methods of inguinal hernia repairMinerva Chir57712PubMed
57.
Stoker, DL, Spiegelhalter, DJ, Singh, R, Wellwood, JM 1994Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trialLancet34312431245PubMed
58.
Akhtar, K, Kamalky-asl, ID, Lamb, WR, Laing, I, Walton, L, Rearson, RC, Rarrott, NR 1998Metabolic and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairAnn R Coll Surg Engl80125130PubMed
59.
Angelescu, N, Jitea, N, Burcos, T, Cristian, D, Voiculescu, S, Dimitriu, C 1998The classical or laparoscopic operation in inguinal herniasChirurgia (Bucur)93213216
60.
Angelescu, N, Jitea, N, Burcos, T, Cristian, D, Voiculescu, S, Dimitriu, C 1996A comparative study of the laparoscopic and classic treatments of inguinal herniasChirurgia (Bucur)45267270
61.
Barkun, JS, Keyser, EJ, Wexler, MJ, Fried, GM, Hinchey, EJ, Fernandez, M, Meakins, JL 1999Short-term outcomes in open vs. laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: confunding impact of workers compesation on convalescenceJ Gastrointest Surg3575582PubMed
62.
Barkun, JS, Wexler, MJ, Hinchey, EJ, Thibeault, D, Meakins, JL 1995Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhayphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trialSurgery118703710PubMed
63.
Bay-Nielsen, M Kehelet, H Strand, L Malmstrom, J Andersen, FH Wara, P Juul, P Danish Hernia Database Collaboration et al. 2001Quality assessment of 26304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide studyLancet35811241128CrossRefPubMed
64.
Bay-Nielsen, M Perkins, FM Kehlet, H Danish Hernia Database Collaboration2001Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhapny: a nationwide questionnaire studyAnn Surg23317PubMed
65.
Cornell, RB, Kerlakian, GM 1994Early complications and outcomes of the current technique of transperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and a comparison to the traditional open approachAm J Surg168275279PubMed
66.
Dirksen, CD, Ament, AJ, Adang, EM, Beets, GL, Go, PM, Baeten, CGMI, Kootstra, G 1998Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal herniaInt J Technol Assess Health Care14472483PubMed
67.
Eno, LM, Spigelman, AD 2000An audit of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairJ Qual Clin Pract205659PubMed
68.
Ferzli, G, Massaad, A, Albert, P, Worth, MH 1993Endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy versus conventional hernia repair: a comparative studyCurr Surg50291294
69.
Gillon, JF, Fagniez, PL 1999Chronic pain and cutaneous sensory changes after inguinal hernia repair: comparison between open and laparoscopic techniquesHernia37580
70.
Haug-Gebhard, S, Becker, HP, Ehrlich, R, Thiede, P, Gerngroß, H 1996Comparison of endoscopic exteperitoneal and conventional hernia repairLangenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd113611613PubMed
71.
Hill, AD, Banwell, PE, Darzi, A, Menzies-Gow, N, Monson, JR, Guillou, PJ 1995Inflammatory markers following laparoscopic and open hernia repairSurg Endosc9695698PubMed
72.
Janu, PG, Sellers, KD, Mangiate, EC 1997Mesh inguinal herniorraphy: a ten-year reviewAm Surg6310651069PubMed
73.
Kald, A, Fridsten, S, Nordin, P, Nilsson, E 2002Outcome and repair of bilateral groin hernias: a prospective evaluation of 1487 patientsEur J Surg168150153PubMed
74.
Kozol, R, Lange, PM, Kosir, M, Beleski, K, Mason, K, Tennenberg, S, Kubinec, SM,  et al. 1997A prospective, randomized study of open vs laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an assessment of postoperative painArch Surg132292295PubMed
75.
Krähenbühl, L, Schäfer, M, Schilling, M, Kuzinkovas, V, Büchler, MW 1998Simultaneous rapair of bilateral inguinal hernias: open or laparoscopic approach?Surg Endosc8313318
76.
Lukaszczyk, JJ, Preletz, RJ, Morrow, GJ, Lange, MK, Tachovsky, TJ, Krall, JM 1996Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy versus traditional open repair at a community hospitalJ Laparoendosc Surg6203208PubMed
77.
McIntosh, E, Donaldson, C, Grant, A 1998Economic evaluation of open versus laparoscopic hernia repair: some pragmatic considerations for measurement of costsSemin Laparosc Surg5242247PubMed
78.
Millikan, KW, Kosik, ML, Doolas, A 1994A prospective comparison of transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university settingSurg Laparosc Endosc4247253PubMed
79.
Nicholson, T, Tiruchelvam, V 1999Comparison of laparoscopic vs open modified Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repairJSLS33943PubMed
80.
Perniceni, T, Danes, M, Boudet, MJ, Levard, H, Gayet, B 1998Laparoscopy versus the Shouldice intervention in the treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia: can the operative surcosts be minimized?Gastroenterol Clin Biol2210611064PubMed
81.
Savarise, MT, Simpson, JP, Moore, JM, Leis, VM 2001Improved functional outcome and more rapid return to normal activity following laparoscopic hernia repairSurg Endosc15574578PubMed
82.
Schultz, LS 1998Laparoscopic versus inguinal hernia repairs: outcome and costsSurg Endosc913071311
83.
Stengel, D, Lange, V 1998Quality of life after inguinal hernia operation: results of a prospective study (Shouldice, Lichtenstein, TAPP)Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd11510201023PubMed
84.
Sheppard, BC 1993Minimal access versus open herniorrhaphyWorld J Med159685686
85.
Takahara, T, Uyama, I, Ogiwara, H, Furuta, T, lida, S 1995Inflammatory responses in open versus laparoscopic herniorrhaphyJ Laparoendosc Surg5317326PubMed
86.
Vale, L, McCormack, K, Scott, N (2001) The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of laparoscopic compared to open surgery for inguinal hernia repair. Report commissioned by National Institute of Clinical Effectiveness, January 2001. Available online at: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk
87.
Vogt, DM, Curet, MJ, Pitcher, DE, Martin, DT, Zucker, KA 1995Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphyAm J Surg1698490PubMed
88.
Bassini, E 1889Nuovo metodo operativo per la cura radicale dell’ernia inguinaleStabilimento ProsperiniPadova
89.
Bittner, R 2003Results of the Magdeburg Consensus Conference on Surgical Hernia RepairZentralbl Chir128549550PubMed
90.
Bittner, R, Schmedt, C-G, Schwarz, J, Kraft, K, Leibl, BJ 2002Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin herniaBr J Surg8910621066PubMed
91.
Feliu-Pala, X, Martín-Gómez, M, Morales-Conde, S, Fernández-Sallent, E 2001The impact of the surgeon’s experience on the results of laparoscopic hernia repairSurg Endosc1514671470PubMed
92.
Lichtenstein, IL, Shulman, AG, Amid, PK, Montllor, MM 1989The tension-free hernioplastyAm J Surg157188193PubMed
93.
Neumayer, L, Jonasson, O, Fitzgibbons, R, Henderson, W, Gibbs, J, Carrico, CJ, Itani, K,  et al. 2003Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: the design of a trial to compare open and laparoscopic surgical techniquesJ Am Coll Surg196743752PubMed
94.
Occelli, G, Barrat, C, Catheline, JM, Voreux, JP, Cueto-Rozon, R, Champault, G 2000Laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernias: prospective evaluation of 757 cases treated by a totally extraperitoneal routeHernia48184
95.
Ramshaw, B, Shuler, FW, Jones, HB, Duncan, TD, White, J, Wilson, R, Lucas, GW,  et al. 2001Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned after 1224 consecutive casesSurg Endosc155054PubMed
96.
Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2004) Comparison of endoscopic techniques versus Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Surg Endosc 19: 188–199PubMed
97.
Schumpelick, V, Arlt, G, Schlachetzki, A, Klosterhalfen, B 1998Chronic incuinal pain after transperitoneal mesh implantation: Case report of net shrinkageChirurg6812971300
98.
Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PMNYH, Ross SJ, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Open mesh versus non-mesh for groin hernia repair (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Wiley, Chichester (UK)
99.
Shouldice, EE 1945Surgical treatment of herniaOntario Med Rev443
100.
Simons, MP, Kleijnen, J, Geldere, D, Hoitsma, HF, Obertop, H 1996Role of Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of controlled trials and a meta-analysisBr J Surg83734738
101.
Schultz, C, Baca, I, Götzen, V 2001Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairSurg Endosc15582584PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
verfasst von
R. Bittner
S. Sauerland
C.-G. Schmedt
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2005
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9049-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Multimedia article

Laparoscopic management of median arcuate ligament syndrome

Original article

Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias

Original article

Gallbladder cancer presenting with acute cholecystitis: a population-based study

Announcements

News and notices

Original article

Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance?

Original article

Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

10.04.2024 | Narbenhernie | Nachrichten

Deutlich weniger Narbenhernien mit der Small-Bites-Technik
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.