Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007

01.04.2007

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases

verfasst von: Edward H. Chin, David Hazzan, Daniel M. Herron, John N. Gaetano, Scott A. Ames, Jonathan S. Bromberg, Michael Edye

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Several large series of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) have been published, largely focusing on immediate results and short-term complications. The aim of this study was to examine the results of LDN and collect medium-term and long-term donor followup.

Methods

We examined the results of two surgeons who performed 500 consecutive LDNs from 1996 to 2005. Prospective databases were reviewed for both donors and recipients to record demographics, medical history, intraoperative events, and complications. Patients were followed between 1 month and 9 years after surgery to assess for delayed complications, especially hypertension, renal insufficiency, incisional hernia, bowel obstruction, and chronic pain.

Results

Left kidneys were procured in 86.2% of cases. Mean operative time was 3.5 h, and warm ischemia time averaged 3.4 min. Hand-assistance was used in 13.8%, and conversion rate was 1.8%. Intraoperative complication rate was 5.8% and was predominantly bleeding (93.1%). Most (86.2%) of the operative complications occurred during the initial 150 cases of a surgeon, compared with 10.3% in the subsequent 150 cases (p = 0.003). Operative time decreased by 87 min after the initial 150 cases (p < 0.001). Immediate graft survival was 97.5%. Delayed graft function occurred in 3.0% of recipients, and acute tubular necrosis occurred in 7.0%. Thirty-day donor complication rate was 9.8%. Mean donor creatinine was 1.24 on the first postoperative day, 1.27 at 2 weeks, and 1.24 at 1 year. At a mean followup of 32.8 months, long-term donor complications consisted of 11 cases of hypertension, 9 cases of prolonged pain or paresthesia, 2 incisional hernias, 1 small bowel obstruction requiring laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, and 1 hydrocele requiring repair.

Conclusions

LDN can be performed with acceptable immediate morbidity and excellent graft function. Operative time and complications decreased significantly after a surgeon performed 150 cases. Long-term complications were uncommon but included a likely underestimated incidence of hypertension.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciszek M, Paczek L, Rowinski W (2003) Clinical outcome of living kidney donation. Transplant Proc 35: 1179PubMedCrossRef Ciszek M, Paczek L, Rowinski W (2003) Clinical outcome of living kidney donation. Transplant Proc 35: 1179PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn JF, Nylander WA Jr, Richie RE, Johnson HK, MacDonell RC Jr, Sawyers JL (1986) Living related kidney donors. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg 203: 637–643PubMedCrossRef Dunn JF, Nylander WA Jr, Richie RE, Johnson HK, MacDonell RC Jr, Sawyers JL (1986) Living related kidney donors. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg 203: 637–643PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman AL, Peters TG, Jones KW, Boulware LE, Ratner LE (2006) Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation. Ann Surg 243: 126–130PubMedCrossRef Friedman AL, Peters TG, Jones KW, Boulware LE, Ratner LE (2006) Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation. Ann Surg 243: 126–130PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, Fink J, Farney A, Philosphe B, Jarrell B, Bartlett ST (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 164: 1494–1499PubMedCrossRef Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, Fink J, Farney A, Philosphe B, Jarrell B, Bartlett ST (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 164: 1494–1499PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 171:47–51PubMedCrossRef Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 171:47–51PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 136: 881–890PubMedCrossRef Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 136: 881–890PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind MY, Zur Borg IM, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Alwayn IP, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN (2005) The effect of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy on the long-term renal function in donor and recipient: a retrospective study. Transplantation 80: 700–703PubMedCrossRef Lind MY, Zur Borg IM, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Alwayn IP, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN (2005) The effect of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy on the long-term renal function in donor and recipient: a retrospective study. Transplantation 80: 700–703PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindstrom P, Haggman M, Wadstrom J (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 422–425PubMedCrossRef Lindstrom P, Haggman M, Wadstrom J (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 422–425PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat London T, Ho HS, Neuhaus AM, Wolfe BM, Rudich SM, Perez RV (2000) Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Ann Surg 231: 195–201PubMedCrossRef London T, Ho HS, Neuhaus AM, Wolfe BM, Rudich SM, Perez RV (2000) Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Ann Surg 231: 195–201PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, Farney AC, Lim JW, Johnson LB, Jacobs S, Flowers JL, Cho ES, Bartlett ST (2005) Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 68: 497–502CrossRef Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, Farney AC, Lim JW, Johnson LB, Jacobs S, Flowers JL, Cho ES, Bartlett ST (2005) Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 68: 497–502CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavaoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavaoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng G, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D (2001) Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 166: 1270–1274PubMedCrossRef Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng G, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D (2001) Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 166: 1270–1274PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, Bluebond-Langer R, Kavoussi LR (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240: 358–363PubMedCrossRef Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, Bluebond-Langer R, Kavoussi LR (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240: 358–363PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, Wall DR, Francis DM, Gridgewater FH, Maddern GJ (2004) A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 78: 404–414PubMedCrossRef Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, Wall DR, Francis DM, Gridgewater FH, Maddern GJ (2004) A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 78: 404–414PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Velidedeoglu E, Williams N, Brayman KL, Desai NM, Campos L, Palanjian M, Wocjik M, Bloom R, Grossman RA, Mange K, Barker CF, Naji A, Markmann JF (2002) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 74: 169–172PubMedCrossRef Velidedeoglu E, Williams N, Brayman KL, Desai NM, Campos L, Palanjian M, Wocjik M, Bloom R, Grossman RA, Mange K, Barker CF, Naji A, Markmann JF (2002) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 74: 169–172PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Watnick TJ, Jenkins RR, Rackoff P, Baumgarten A, Bia MJ (1988) Microalbuminuria and hypertension in long-term renal donors. Transplantation 45:59–65PubMedCrossRef Watnick TJ, Jenkins RR, Rackoff P, Baumgarten A, Bia MJ (1988) Microalbuminuria and hypertension in long-term renal donors. Transplantation 45:59–65PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
Intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases
verfasst von
Edward H. Chin
David Hazzan
Daniel M. Herron
John N. Gaetano
Scott A. Ames
Jonathan S. Bromberg
Michael Edye
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9021-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.