Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2007

01.09.2007

Effect of robotic assistance on the “learning curve” for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy

verfasst von: S. Horgan, C. Galvani, M. V. Gorodner, G. R. Jacobsen, F. Moser, A. Manzelli, J. Oberholzer, M. P. Fisichella, D. Bogetti, G. Testa, H. N. Sankary, E. Benedetti

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The number of living-related donor kidney transplantations have increased since the advent of minimally invasive surgery. Robotic technology has emerged as a promising alternative to laparoscopic techniques. The authors reviewed their institution experience with robotic hand-assisted donor nephrectomies (RHADNs).

Methods

Between August 2000 and April 2006, 273 robotically assisted left donor nephrectomies were performed using a hand-assisted technique. Prospectively collected information for 214 patients regarding complications, hospital stay, blood loss, warm ischemia time, operative time, and outcomes is presented.

Results

The cohort of donors included 110 men and 104 women with a mean age of 36 years (range, 18–61 years). These donors included 86 African Americans, 46 Caucasians, 74 Hispanics, and 8 of other races. Left renal artery anomalies were found in 61 patients (29%). Four patients underwent conversion to open surgery. The hospital stay was 2.3 days (range, 1–8 days), the blood loss 82 ml (range, 10–1,500 ml), and the mean warm ischemia time 98 s (range, 50–200 s). The operative time was 201 min (range, 100–320 min) for the first 74 cases, 129 min (range, 65–240 min) for the second 70 cases, and 103 min for the last 70 cases (p < 0.001), for an overall average of 150 min. Complications decreased significantly after the first 74 cases. The 1-year patient survival rate was 100%, and the 1-year graft survival rate was 98%. The average recipient creatinine at 6 months was 1.4 mg/dl.

Conclusions

Specific changes in operative technique over time have improved patient safety and diminished complications with RHADN. Currently, RHADN can be performed expeditiously with a minimal rate of complications and conversion to open procedure by a surgical team with appropriate training and experience.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat 2001 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report 1991–2000 (2001) In: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 2001 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report 1991–2000 (2001) In: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballantyne GH (2002) The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 1–5PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH (2002) The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 1–5PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Berggren U, Zethraeus N, Arvidsson D, Haglund U, Jonsson B (1996) A cost-minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 172: 305–310PubMedCrossRef Berggren U, Zethraeus N, Arvidsson D, Haglund U, Jonsson B (1996) A cost-minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 172: 305–310PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Blagg CR (1993) The U.S. Renal Data System and the Case-Mix Severity Study. Am J Kidney Dis 21: 106–108PubMed Blagg CR (1993) The U.S. Renal Data System and the Case-Mix Severity Study. Am J Kidney Dis 21: 106–108PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Abreu SC, Hanaway MJ, Ng CS, Kaouk JH, Clippard M, Zaki S, Goldfarb DA, Woodle ES, Gill IS (2004) Right donor nephrectomy: a comparison of hand-assisted transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approaches. Transplantation 77: 521–525PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Abreu SC, Hanaway MJ, Ng CS, Kaouk JH, Clippard M, Zaki S, Goldfarb DA, Woodle ES, Gill IS (2004) Right donor nephrectomy: a comparison of hand-assisted transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approaches. Transplantation 77: 521–525PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cecka JM (2000) The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry—2000. Clin Transplant 1–18 Cecka JM (2000) The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry—2000. Clin Transplant 1–18
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Finelli FC, Gongora E, Sasaki TM, Light JA (2001) A survey: the prevalence of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at large U.S. transplant centers. Transplantation 71: 1862–1864 Finelli FC, Gongora E, Sasaki TM, Light JA (2001) A survey: the prevalence of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at large U.S. transplant centers. Transplantation 71: 1862–1864
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, Evans D, Imbembo AL, Bartlett ST (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226: 483–489; discussion 489–490PubMedCrossRef Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, Evans D, Imbembo AL, Bartlett ST (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226: 483–489; discussion 489–490PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill IS, Carbone JM, Clayman RV, Fadden PA, Stone MA, Lucas BA, McRoberts JW (1994) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 8: 143–148PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Carbone JM, Clayman RV, Fadden PA, Stone MA, Lucas BA, McRoberts JW (1994) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 8: 143–148PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Horgan S, Benedetti E, Moser F (2004) Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 188: 45S–51SPubMedCrossRef Horgan S, Benedetti E, Moser F (2004) Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 188: 45S–51SPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Horgan S, Vanuno D, Benedetti E (2002) Early experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 64–70PubMedCrossRef Horgan S, Vanuno D, Benedetti E (2002) Early experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 64–70PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, Cicalese L, Benedetti E (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 73: 1474–1479PubMedCrossRef Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, Cicalese L, Benedetti E (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 73: 1474–1479PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 171: 47–51PubMedCrossRef Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 171: 47–51PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jatzko GR, Lisborg PH, Pertl AM, Stettner HM (1995) Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 221: 381–386PubMedCrossRef Jatzko GR, Lisborg PH, Pertl AM, Stettner HM (1995) Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 221: 381–386PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavoussi LR, Kerbl K, Capelouto CC, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1993) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal neoplasms. Urology 42: 603–609PubMedCrossRef Kavoussi LR, Kerbl K, Capelouto CC, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1993) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal neoplasms. Urology 42: 603–609PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kercher K, Dahl D, Harland R, Blute R, Gallagher K, Litwin D (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes warm ischemia. Urology 58: 152–156PubMedCrossRef Kercher K, Dahl D, Harland R, Blute R, Gallagher K, Litwin D (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes warm ischemia. Urology 58: 152–156PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 136: 881–890PubMedCrossRef Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 136: 881–890PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat McDougall E, Clayman RV, Elashry OM (1996) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience. J Urol 155: 1180–1185PubMedCrossRef McDougall E, Clayman RV, Elashry OM (1996) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience. J Urol 155: 1180–1185PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Melcher ML, Carter JT, Posselt A, Duh QY, Stoller M, Freise CE, Kang SM (2005) More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery. Arch Surg 140: 835–839; discussion 839–840PubMedCrossRef Melcher ML, Carter JT, Posselt A, Duh QY, Stoller M, Freise CE, Kang SM (2005) More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery. Arch Surg 140: 835–839; discussion 839–840PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Merlin TL, Scott DF, Rao MM, Wall DR, Francis DM, Bridgewater FH, Maddern GJ (2000). The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a systematic review. Transplantation 70: 1659–1666PubMedCrossRef Merlin TL, Scott DF, Rao MM, Wall DR, Francis DM, Bridgewater FH, Maddern GJ (2000). The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a systematic review. Transplantation 70: 1659–1666PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Crookes P, Oberg S, de Vos Shoop M, Hagen JA, Bremner CG (1998) The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: prospective evaluation of 100 patients with “typical” symptoms. Ann Surg 228: 40–50PubMedCrossRef Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Crookes P, Oberg S, de Vos Shoop M, Hagen JA, Bremner CG (1998) The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: prospective evaluation of 100 patients with “typical” symptoms. Ann Surg 228: 40–50PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Buell JF, Kuo PC (2000) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: pro. Transplantation 70: 1544–1546PubMedCrossRef Ratner LE, Buell JF, Kuo PC (2000) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: pro. Transplantation 70: 1544–1546PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60: 1047–1049PubMed Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60: 1047–1049PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a review of the first 5 years. Urol Clin North Am 28: 709–719PubMedCrossRef Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a review of the first 5 years. Urol Clin North Am 28: 709–719PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC, Lin G, Chapman W, Lowell J, Boxerman S, Hardinger KL, Kalo Z (2003) The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 75: 1940–1945PubMedCrossRef Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC, Lin G, Chapman W, Lowell J, Boxerman S, Hardinger KL, Kalo Z (2003) The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 75: 1940–1945PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, Machan CH, Philosophe B, Farney A, Colonna J, Jarrell BE, Bartlett ST (2000) Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 232:392–400PubMedCrossRef Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, Machan CH, Philosophe B, Farney A, Colonna J, Jarrell BE, Bartlett ST (2000) Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 232:392–400PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith CD, Weber CJ, Amerson JR (1999) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard. World J Surg 23: 389–396PubMedCrossRef Smith CD, Weber CJ, Amerson JR (1999) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard. World J Surg 23: 389–396PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, Bluebond-Langner R, Kavoussi LR (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240: 358–363PubMedCrossRef Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, Bluebond-Langner R, Kavoussi LR (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240: 358–363PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of robotic assistance on the “learning curve” for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy
verfasst von
S. Horgan
C. Galvani
M. V. Gorodner
G. R. Jacobsen
F. Moser
A. Manzelli
J. Oberholzer
M. P. Fisichella
D. Bogetti
G. Testa
H. N. Sankary
E. Benedetti
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9140-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.