Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2007

01.12.2007

Clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic posterior rectopexy (Wells) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. A prospective study

verfasst von: Jean-Louis Dulucq, Pascal Wintringer, Ahmad Mahajna

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic rectopexy offers the advantages of the open transabdominal approach while decreasing the surgical comorbidity. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic Wells procedure for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Methods

Between 1999 and 2005, 77 patients underwent laparoscopic modified Wells procedure for full-thickness rectal prolapse. The patients were evaluated postoperatively for resolution of their prolapse and functional outcome, as well as for their satisfaction level regarding the procedure.

Results

Laparoscopy was successful in all but one case. There were no major intra- or postoperative complications and the mean hospital stay was 4.9 days. Approximately half of the patients had some degree of fecal incontinence preoperatively. At long-term follow up, 89 percent experienced alleviation of symptoms. Constipation was improved in 36% of cases. Eighteen percent of the patients suffered a new onset of constipation. Recurrent prolapse was observed in one patient. Ninety percent of the patients were satisfied at long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

The laparoscopic Wells procedure for rectal prolapse had good functional results, a low recurrence rate and proved to be a feasible and safe procedure. Postoperative constipation remains a problem, which should be solved.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Broden B, Snellman B (1968) Procidentia of the rectum studies with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 11: 330–347CrossRefPubMed Broden B, Snellman B (1968) Procidentia of the rectum studies with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 11: 330–347CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Keighley MRB, Fielding JWL, Alexander-Williams J (1983) Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 70: 229–232CrossRefPubMed Keighley MRB, Fielding JWL, Alexander-Williams J (1983) Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 70: 229–232CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Santhanam AN, Cabot R, Speakman CT (1995) Abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 301–307 Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Santhanam AN, Cabot R, Speakman CT (1995) Abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 301–307
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V (1988) Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 155: 206–210CrossRefPubMed Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V (1988) Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 155: 206–210CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79: 107–113CrossRefPubMed Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79: 107–113CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Watts JD, Rothenberg DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S (1985) The management of procidentia: thirty years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 96–102CrossRefPubMed Watts JD, Rothenberg DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S (1985) The management of procidentia: thirty years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 96–102CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Eu K-W, Seow-Choen F (1997) Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment [review]. Br J Surg 84: 904–911CrossRefPubMed Eu K-W, Seow-Choen F (1997) Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment [review]. Br J Surg 84: 904–911CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R (2001) The altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 265–570CrossRef Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R (2001) The altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 265–570CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Berman IR. Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum Berman IR. Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Browning GGP, Parks AG (1983) Postanal repair of neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressures. Br J Surg 70: 101–104CrossRefPubMed Browning GGP, Parks AG (1983) Postanal repair of neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressures. Br J Surg 70: 101–104CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Aitola PT, Hiltunen K-M, Matikainen MJ (1999) Functional results of postoperative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period. Emphasis on transabdominal approach. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 655–60CrossRefPubMed Aitola PT, Hiltunen K-M, Matikainen MJ (1999) Functional results of postoperative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period. Emphasis on transabdominal approach. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 655–60CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Loyuge J, Nordlinger B, Cunsi O, et al. (1984) Rectopexy to the promontory for treatment of rectal prolapse: report of 257 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 27: 356–9CrossRef Loyuge J, Nordlinger B, Cunsi O, et al. (1984) Rectopexy to the promontory for treatment of rectal prolapse: report of 257 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 27: 356–9CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, et al. (1995) Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endos 9: 301–5 Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, et al. (1995) Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endos 9: 301–5
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon MJ, Eyers AA (1995) Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple. Dis Colon Rectum 39: 279–84CrossRef Solomon MJ, Eyers AA (1995) Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple. Dis Colon Rectum 39: 279–84CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 199–201 Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 199–201
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Benoist S, Taffinder N, Gould S, Chang A, Darzi A (2001) Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy. Am J Surg 182: 168–173CrossRefPubMed Benoist S, Taffinder N, Gould S, Chang A, Darzi A (2001) Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy. Am J Surg 182: 168–173CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA (2002) Randomised clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89: 35–39CrossRefPubMed Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA (2002) Randomised clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89: 35–39CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Madbouly KM, Senagore AJ, Delaney HJ, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Clinically based management of rectal prolapse-Comparison of the laparoscopic Wells procedure and laparoscopic resection with rectopexy. Surg Endosc 17: 99–103CrossRefPubMed Madbouly KM, Senagore AJ, Delaney HJ, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Clinically based management of rectal prolapse-Comparison of the laparoscopic Wells procedure and laparoscopic resection with rectopexy. Surg Endosc 17: 99–103CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M (1999) Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc 13: 139–141CrossRefPubMed Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M (1999) Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc 13: 139–141CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Snooks SJ, Henery MM, Swash M (1985) Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse; differential assessment of the innervation of puborectalis and external sphincter anal muscles. Gut 26: 470–6CrossRefPubMed Snooks SJ, Henery MM, Swash M (1985) Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse; differential assessment of the innervation of puborectalis and external sphincter anal muscles. Gut 26: 470–6CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Delamarre JB, Goozen HG, Kruyt RH, et al. (1991) The effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 311–16CrossRef Delamarre JB, Goozen HG, Kruyt RH, et al. (1991) The effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 311–16CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, et al. (1994) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 805–13CrossRefPubMed Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, et al. (1994) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 805–13CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aichison MA, Finlay IG (1992) A prospective randomised study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 145–48PubMed McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aichison MA, Finlay IG (1992) A prospective randomised study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 145–48PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen-Mersh TG, Turner MJ, Mann CV (1990) Effect of abdominal Ivalon rectopexy on bowel habit and rectal wall. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 550–53CrossRefPubMed Allen-Mersh TG, Turner MJ, Mann CV (1990) Effect of abdominal Ivalon rectopexy on bowel habit and rectal wall. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 550–53CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolk A, Broden G, Holmstrom B, Johansson C, Nilsson BY (1990) Slow transit of the colon associated with severe constipation after the Ripstien procedure. A cloinical and physiologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 786–790CrossRefPubMed Dolk A, Broden G, Holmstrom B, Johansson C, Nilsson BY (1990) Slow transit of the colon associated with severe constipation after the Ripstien procedure. A cloinical and physiologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 786–790CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 1189–1195CrossRefPubMed Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 1189–1195CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulos PB, Strykers SJ, Nicholls RJ (1984) The long-term results of polyvinyl alcohol (Ivalon) sponge for rectal prolapse in young patients. Br J Surg 71: 213–214CrossRefPubMed Boulos PB, Strykers SJ, Nicholls RJ (1984) The long-term results of polyvinyl alcohol (Ivalon) sponge for rectal prolapse in young patients. Br J Surg 71: 213–214CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuijpers HC (1992) Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg 16: 826–830CrossRefPubMed Kuijpers HC (1992) Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg 16: 826–830CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic posterior rectopexy (Wells) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. A prospective study
verfasst von
Jean-Louis Dulucq
Pascal Wintringer
Ahmad Mahajna
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9350-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.