Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008

01.03.2008

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy for right kidneys: Experience in a German community hospital

verfasst von: S. Saad, A. Paul, J. Treckmann, M. Nagelschmidt, M. Heiss, W. Arns

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has become the new gold standard for kidney procurement in many high-volume transplant centres worldwide, but it is often limited to left-sided donor kidneys. Concerns about adequate anatomical renal vessel length and sufficient surgical exposure are the main obstacles to the use of the laparoscopic approach for right kidney live donors as well.

Material and methods

From 1998 to 2006 we performed laparoscopic kidney procurement in 73 live kidney donors on an intention-to-treat basis, harvesting a total of 48 left (LKG) and 25 right kidneys (RKG) for transplantation. We compared these two groups with respect to operating time, conversion rate, complications, hospital stay, and recipient outcome.

Results

There were no differences in outcome of donor patients after left (D-LKG) or right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (D-RKG). Operating time was 160 min in D-RKG versus 164 min in D-LKG. Warm ischemia was below 150 s in both groups. Hospital stay was 7.0 (D-RKG) versus 6.7 days (D-LKG). Negative events on the donor site were one temporary nerve irritation in each group and one postoperative retroperitoneal hematoma in the left kidney group. Reasons to convert to open nephrectomy were bleeding in two patients in the left kidney group and adhesions in one patient in the right kidney group. The outcome of the recipients after left (R-LKG) or right kidney (R-RKG) transplantation was similar. One kidney was lost due to renal vein thrombosis (R-LKG). Postoperative ureter complications occurred in one patient of each group. One patient of the R-RKG and two patients of the R-LKG required lymphocele fenestration. All other kidney transplants worked without problems.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure and has been established as the method of choice for live kidney donation in our clinic. Laparoscopic procurement of right and left kidneys can be performed with comparable quality and outcome for donors and recipients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron PW, Baldwin DD, Hadley HR, Ojogho ON, Ruckle HC, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and results in increased kidney donation. Am Surg 70:901–905PubMed Baron PW, Baldwin DD, Hadley HR, Ojogho ON, Ruckle HC, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and results in increased kidney donation. Am Surg 70:901–905PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bemelman WA, van Doorn RC, de Wit LT, Kox C, Surachno J, et al. (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 15:442–444PubMedCrossRef Bemelman WA, van Doorn RC, de Wit LT, Kox C, Surachno J, et al. (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 15:442–444PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A, et al. (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2:983–988PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A, et al. (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2:983–988PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 19:102–109PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 19:102–109PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Derweesh IH, Goldfarb DA, Abreu SC, Goel M, Flechner SM, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65:862–866PubMedCrossRef Derweesh IH, Goldfarb DA, Abreu SC, Goel M, Flechner SM, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65:862–866PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation (2006) (www.dso.de) Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation (2006) (www.dso.de)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA (2004) Donor nephrectomy: A comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 171:40–43PubMedCrossRef El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA (2004) Donor nephrectomy: A comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 171:40–43PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, et al. (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226:483–489; discussion 489–490PubMedCrossRef Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, et al. (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226:483–489; discussion 489–490PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Roigas J, Turk I, et al. (2003) [Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results]. Urologe A 42:218–224PubMed Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Roigas J, Turk I, et al. (2003) [Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results]. Urologe A 42:218–224PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 90:1323–1332PubMedCrossRef Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 90:1323–1332PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, et al. (2006) Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 81:881–887PubMedCrossRef Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, et al. (2006) Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 81:881–887PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR, et al. (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. Bmj 333:221PubMedCrossRef Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR, et al. (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. Bmj 333:221PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai IR, Tsai MK, Lee PH (2004) Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:749–753PubMed Lai IR, Tsai MK, Lee PH (2004) Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:749–753PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, et al. (2004) A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 17:589–595PubMedCrossRef Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, et al. (2004) A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 17:589–595PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE (2001) Should the indications for laparascopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindiction to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 71:660–664PubMedCrossRef Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE (2001) Should the indications for laparascopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindiction to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 71:660–664PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Melcher ML, Carter JT, Posselt A, Duh QY, Stoller M, et al. (2005) More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery. Arch Surg 140:835–839; discussion 839–840PubMedCrossRef Melcher ML, Carter JT, Posselt A, Duh QY, Stoller M, et al. (2005) More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery. Arch Surg 140:835–839; discussion 839–840PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer F, Santos LS, Varaschin AE, Patriani AH, Pimpao BF (2005) Hand-assisted right laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donor. Int Braz J Urol 31:17–21PubMedCrossRef Meyer F, Santos LS, Varaschin AE, Patriani AH, Pimpao BF (2005) Hand-assisted right laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donor. Int Braz J Urol 31:17–21PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, Schweitzer E, Wiland A, et al. (1999) A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 67:722–728PubMedCrossRef Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, Schweitzer E, Wiland A, et al. (1999) A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 67:722–728PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, et al. (2003) Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 169:2018–2021PubMedCrossRef Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, et al. (2003) Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 169:2018–2021PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, Stoller ML, Meng MV, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78:1665–1669PubMedCrossRef Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, Stoller ML, Meng MV, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78:1665–1669PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, Drehmer I, Jurgowski W, et al. (2001) Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature. Urologe A 40:485–492PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, Drehmer I, Jurgowski W, et al. (2001) Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature. Urologe A 40:485–492PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, et al. (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, et al. (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Chavin KD, Montgomery R (1998) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 65:1657–1658PubMedCrossRef Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Chavin KD, Montgomery R (1998) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 65:1657–1658PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH, et al. (1997) Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc 29:138–139PubMedCrossRef Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH, et al. (1997) Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc 29:138–139PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240:358–363PubMedCrossRef Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240:358–363PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy for right kidneys: Experience in a German community hospital
verfasst von
S. Saad
A. Paul
J. Treckmann
M. Nagelschmidt
M. Heiss
W. Arns
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9459-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.