Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2008

01.06.2008

Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks

verfasst von: D. T. Simmons, B. T. Petersen, C. J. Gostout, M. J. Levy, M. D. Topazian, T. H. Baron

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic transpapillary biliary stent placement is effective for closure of postoperative bile leaks. Large-bore stents (10 French) may transiently obstruct the adjacent pancreatic duct orifice causing acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy may reduce this risk, but it introduces separate risks of bleeding and perforation. The objective of this study was to compare complications after large-bore biliary stent placement (10 Fr) with and without sphincterotomy in patients with bile leaks.

Methods

The institutional endoscopy database was queried to identify patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrpahy (ERCP) for bile leak between March 1996 and August 2006. Procedural reports were reviewed for evidence of biliary sphincterotomy, cholangiographic and pancreatographic findings, transpapillary stent placement, and procedural complications. Patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy, choledochoenteric anastomosis, placement of multiple biliary stents and expandable metal biliary stents, biliary stents smaller than 10 Fr, and patients in whom a stent was not placed were excluded. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Probability ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The rate of pancreatitis (all mild) after large-bore biliary stent placement was greater when sphincterotomy was not performed than when sphincterotomy and stent placement were both performed (13% versus 2.4%). This difference was not statistically significant. (χ2 = 3.41; p = 0.1). Bleeding was observed in one patient who underwent sphincterotomy and large-bore stent placement (2.4%). No perforations occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Although not statistically significant, there is a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis after placement of large-bore biliary stents when sphincterotomy is not performed. The additional complications of biliary sphincterotomy did not offset the reduction in post-ERCP pancreatitis. When large-bore biliary stents are used in the treatment of bile leak, a biliary sphincterotomy may avoid pancreatitis. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether there is a significant difference in overall complication rate when large-bore stents are placed with and without biliary sphincterotomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184:571–578PubMed Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184:571–578PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barthel JS (1996) Letters to the editor. Internal stents and postsurgical bile leaks Am J Gastroenterol 91:1469–1470PubMed Barthel JS (1996) Letters to the editor. Internal stents and postsurgical bile leaks Am J Gastroenterol 91:1469–1470PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjorkman DJ, Carr-Locke DL, Lichtenstein DR, Ferrari AP, Slivka A, Van Dam J, Brooks DC (1995) Postsurgical bile leaks: endoscopic obliteration of the transpapillary pressure gradient is enough. Am J Gastroenterol 90:2128–2133PubMed Bjorkman DJ, Carr-Locke DL, Lichtenstein DR, Ferrari AP, Slivka A, Van Dam J, Brooks DC (1995) Postsurgical bile leaks: endoscopic obliteration of the transpapillary pressure gradient is enough. Am J Gastroenterol 90:2128–2133PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Braghetto I, Bastias J, Csendes A, Debandi A (2000) Intraperitoneal bile collections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: causes, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Surg Endosc 14:1037–1041PubMedCrossRef Braghetto I, Bastias J, Csendes A, Debandi A (2000) Intraperitoneal bile collections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: causes, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Surg Endosc 14:1037–1041PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooks DC, Becker JM, Connors PJ, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:292–295PubMedCrossRef Brooks DC, Becker JM, Connors PJ, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:292–295PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, Ryan M, Parker H, Frakes JT, Fogel EL, Silverman WB, Dua KS, Aliperti G, Yakshe P, Uzer M, Jones W, Goff J, Lazzell-Pannell L, Rashdan A, Temkit M, Lehman GA (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, Ryan M, Parker H, Frakes JT, Fogel EL, Silverman WB, Dua KS, Aliperti G, Yakshe P, Uzer M, Jones W, Goff J, Lazzell-Pannell L, Rashdan A, Temkit M, Lehman GA (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMed Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RTA, Toouli J (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 218:630–634CrossRef Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RTA, Toouli J (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 218:630–634CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman ML, Douglas BN, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909–918PubMedCrossRef Freeman ML, Douglas BN, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909–918PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Sode Y, Miyazawa M, Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi M, Kawamura N, Ohtsuka M, Miyzzaki T, Matsuda Y (1998) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11:1123–1125CrossRef Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Sode Y, Miyazawa M, Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi M, Kawamura N, Ohtsuka M, Miyzzaki T, Matsuda Y (1998) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11:1123–1125CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadakia SC, Starnes E (1992) Comparison of 10 French gauge stent with 11.5 French gauge stent in patients with biliary tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 38:454–459PubMed Kadakia SC, Starnes E (1992) Comparison of 10 French gauge stent with 11.5 French gauge stent in patients with biliary tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 38:454–459PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, Byth K, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2005) Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 61:269–275PubMedCrossRef Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, Byth K, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2005) Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 61:269–275PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg R, Wagonfeld J, Ball T (1992) Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecsytectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch Intern Med 152:1040–1043PubMedCrossRef Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg R, Wagonfeld J, Ball T (1992) Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecsytectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch Intern Med 152:1040–1043PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315–321PubMedCrossRef MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315–321PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Marks JM, Ponsky JL, Shillingstad RB, Singh J (1998) Biliary stenting is more effective than sphincterotomy in the resolution of biliary leaks. Surg Endosc 12:327–330PubMedCrossRef Marks JM, Ponsky JL, Shillingstad RB, Singh J (1998) Biliary stenting is more effective than sphincterotomy in the resolution of biliary leaks. Surg Endosc 12:327–330PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Marvrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Papanikolaou IS, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, Romanos A (2006) Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:405–409CrossRef Marvrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Papanikolaou IS, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, Romanos A (2006) Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:405–409CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Navez B. Mutter D. Russier Y, Vix M, Jameli F, Lipski D, Cambier E, Guiot P, Lery J, Marescaux J (2001) Safety of laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 600 cases. World J Surg 25:1352–1356CrossRef Navez B. Mutter D. Russier Y, Vix M, Jameli F, Lipski D, Cambier E, Guiot P, Lery J, Marescaux J (2001) Safety of laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 600 cases. World J Surg 25:1352–1356CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:164–171PubMedCrossRef Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:164–171PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Speer AG, Cotton PB, MacRae KD (1988) Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge. Gastrointest Endosc 34:412–417PubMed Speer AG, Cotton PB, MacRae KD (1988) Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge. Gastrointest Endosc 34:412–417PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Uflacker R, Vujic I, Cotton PB (1996) Transpapillary stenting of proximal biliary strictures: does biliary sphincterotomy reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis? Gastrointest Endosc 43:399 Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Uflacker R, Vujic I, Cotton PB (1996) Transpapillary stenting of proximal biliary strictures: does biliary sphincterotomy reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis? Gastrointest Endosc 43:399
Metadaten
Titel
Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks
verfasst von
D. T. Simmons
B. T. Petersen
C. J. Gostout
M. J. Levy
M. D. Topazian
T. H. Baron
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9643-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.