Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2009

01.03.2009

Robotic implantation of gastric electrical stimulation electrodes for gastroparesis

verfasst von: Jon C. Gould, Chirag Dholakia

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a low-morbidity treatment option that may be effective for refractory symptoms in patients with gastroparesis of diabetic or idiopathic etiology. During surgery to initiate GES, two electrodes are tunneled in the gastric antrum in a precise location. If these electrodes pass through the mucosa and into the gastric lumen (determined by endoscopy) they must be repositioned, often multiple times. During this procedure, extensive suturing to anchor the electrodes is necessary once properly placed. Robotic surgical systems may provide surgeons with several technical and ergonomic advantages during this procedure when compared with a standard laparoscopic approach.

Methods

Over a 26-month period, 22 GES systems were implanted. The initial procedures were performed laparoscopically. After the first 15 laparoscopic cases, a technique for robotically implanting leads was developed and employed for the remainder of the series. Demographics, operative time, and endoscopically confirmed electrode mucosal perforations were quantified and compared based on operative approach.

Results

Patients were similar demographically. Total operative time did not differ based on technique (152 ± 40 min laparoscopic versus 158 ± 38 min robotic placement; p = 0.6). Mucosal perforations on first attempt at electrode placement occurred more frequently with the laparoscopic than with the robotic technique (15/30 laparoscopic versus 1/14 robotic; p = 0.006). There were no procedure-related complications.

Conclusions

The robotic approach to GES electrode implantation is feasible and safe. Compared with standard laparoscopic techniques, the accurate insertion and anchoring of these leads can be accomplished more efficiently and comfortably using robotic techniques. Whether robotic GES electrode placement will result in significant clinical advantages for patients will require long-term follow-up.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abell TR, McCallum RW, Hocking M, Koch K, Abrahamsson H, Leblanc I, Lindberg G, Konturek J, Nowak T, Quigley EM, Tougas G, Starkebaum W (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428PubMedCrossRef Abell TR, McCallum RW, Hocking M, Koch K, Abrahamsson H, Leblanc I, Lindberg G, Konturek J, Nowak T, Quigley EM, Tougas G, Starkebaum W (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anand C, Al-Juburi A, Familoni B, Rashed H, Cutts T, Abidi N, Johnson WD, Minocha A, Abell TL (2007) Gastric electrical stimulation is safe and effective: a long-term study in patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis in three regional centers. Digestion 75:83–89PubMedCrossRef Anand C, Al-Juburi A, Familoni B, Rashed H, Cutts T, Abidi N, Johnson WD, Minocha A, Abell TL (2007) Gastric electrical stimulation is safe and effective: a long-term study in patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis in three regional centers. Digestion 75:83–89PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Eagon JC, Kelly KA (1993) Effects of gastric pacing on canine gastric motility and emptying. Am J Physiol 265:767–774 Eagon JC, Kelly KA (1993) Effects of gastric pacing on canine gastric motility and emptying. Am J Physiol 265:767–774
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Miedema BW, Sarr MG, Kelly KA (1992) Pacing the human stomach. Surgery; 111:143–150PubMed Miedema BW, Sarr MG, Kelly KA (1992) Pacing the human stomach. Surgery; 111:143–150PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Csepel J, Goldfarb B, Shapsis A, Goff S, Gabriel N, Eng HM (2006) Electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: gastric motility restored. Surg Endosc 20:302–306PubMedCrossRef de Csepel J, Goldfarb B, Shapsis A, Goff S, Gabriel N, Eng HM (2006) Electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: gastric motility restored. Surg Endosc 20:302–306PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Juburi A, Granger S, Barnes J, Voeller G, Beech D, Amiri H, Abell TL (2005) Laparoscopy shortens length of stay in patients with gastric electrical stimulators. JSLS 9(3):305–310PubMed Al-Juburi A, Granger S, Barnes J, Voeller G, Beech D, Amiri H, Abell TL (2005) Laparoscopy shortens length of stay in patients with gastric electrical stimulators. JSLS 9(3):305–310PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231PubMed Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon ML, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90(12):1479–1492PubMedCrossRef Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon ML, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90(12):1479–1492PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Markley S, Sierra R, Heniford BT, Scott DJ (2007) Closing the gap in operative performance between novices and experts: does harder mean better for laparoscopic simulator training? J Am Coll Surg 205(2):307–313PubMedCrossRef Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Markley S, Sierra R, Heniford BT, Scott DJ (2007) Closing the gap in operative performance between novices and experts: does harder mean better for laparoscopic simulator training? J Am Coll Surg 205(2):307–313PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu RC, Sabnis AA, Chand B (2007) Erosion of gastric electrical stimulator electrodes: evaluation, management, and laparoscopic techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(5):438–441PubMedCrossRef Liu RC, Sabnis AA, Chand B (2007) Erosion of gastric electrical stimulator electrodes: evaluation, management, and laparoscopic techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(5):438–441PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker JC, Dietl KH, Konturek JW, Domschke W, Pohle T (2004) Gastric wall perforation: a rare complication of gastric electrical stimulation. Gastrointest Endosc 59:584–586PubMedCrossRef Becker JC, Dietl KH, Konturek JW, Domschke W, Pohle T (2004) Gastric wall perforation: a rare complication of gastric electrical stimulation. Gastrointest Endosc 59:584–586PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu-Abeid S, Keidar A, Gavert N, Blanc A, Szold A (2003) The clinical spectrum of band erosion following laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 17:861–863PubMedCrossRef Abu-Abeid S, Keidar A, Gavert N, Blanc A, Szold A (2003) The clinical spectrum of band erosion following laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 17:861–863PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Suter M, Giusti V, Heraief E, Calmes JM (2004) Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: occurrence and results after conversion to Roux en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 14:381–386PubMedCrossRef Suter M, Giusti V, Heraief E, Calmes JM (2004) Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: occurrence and results after conversion to Roux en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 14:381–386PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin Z, Sarosiek I, Forster J, McCallum RW (2006) Symptom responses, long-term outcomes and adverse events beyond 3 years of high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 18:18–27PubMedCrossRef Lin Z, Sarosiek I, Forster J, McCallum RW (2006) Symptom responses, long-term outcomes and adverse events beyond 3 years of high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 18:18–27PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Abell T, Van Cutsem E, Abrahamsson H, Huizinga JD, Konturek JW, Galmiche JP, VoelIer G, Filez L, Everts B, Waterfall WE, Domschke W, Bruley des Varannes S, Familoni BO, Bourgeois IM, Janssens J, Tougas G (2002) Gastric electrical stimulation in intractable symptomatic gastroparesis. Digestion 66:204–212PubMedCrossRef Abell T, Van Cutsem E, Abrahamsson H, Huizinga JD, Konturek JW, Galmiche JP, VoelIer G, Filez L, Everts B, Waterfall WE, Domschke W, Bruley des Varannes S, Familoni BO, Bourgeois IM, Janssens J, Tougas G (2002) Gastric electrical stimulation in intractable symptomatic gastroparesis. Digestion 66:204–212PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abell T, McCallum R, Hocking M, Koch K, Abrahamsson H, Leblanc I, Lindberg G, Konturek J, Nowak T, Quigley EM, Tougas G, Starkebaum W (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428PubMedCrossRef Abell T, McCallum R, Hocking M, Koch K, Abrahamsson H, Leblanc I, Lindberg G, Konturek J, Nowak T, Quigley EM, Tougas G, Starkebaum W (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60(1):39–45PubMedCrossRef Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60(1):39–45PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN (2003) Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17(11):1744–1748PubMedCrossRef Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN (2003) Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17(11):1744–1748PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Eemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND (2007) Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(3):171–174CrossRef Eemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND (2007) Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(3):171–174CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS, Sanchez BR, Curet MJ (2006) Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux en-Y Gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg 16(6):690–696PubMedCrossRef Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS, Sanchez BR, Curet MJ (2006) Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux en-Y Gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg 16(6):690–696PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gofrit ON, Mikahail AA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL (2008) Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 71(3):404–407PubMedCrossRef Gofrit ON, Mikahail AA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL (2008) Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 71(3):404–407PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic implantation of gastric electrical stimulation electrodes for gastroparesis
verfasst von
Jon C. Gould
Chirag Dholakia
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0063-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.