Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2009

01.09.2009

Endoscopic management of anastomotic hemorrhage from pancreatogastrostomy

verfasst von: Jens Standop, Nico Schäfer, Marcus Overhaus, Volker Schmitz, Lissie Ladwein, Andreas Hirner, Jörg C. Kalff

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Hemorrhage from pancreatic-enteric anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a critical condition due to its difficult accessibility and delicate condition, and therefore remains a major challenge for the surgeon in charge.

Objective

This study analyzed presentation and management of pancreatogastrostomy hemorrhage (PGH) after PD to determine the respective roles of endoscopy and surgery.

Patients and methods

Patients who underwent PD with pancreatogastrostomy between 1989 and January 2008 were identified from a pancreatic resection database and analyzed with regards to PGH, treatment strategy and outcome, and incidence of postoperative complications.

Results

Out of 265 consecutive patients with PD, 10 patients (3.7%) experienced an episode of PGH, detected on average on postoperative day 5. No patient with PGH died during hospital stay as opposed to a mortality rate of 2.7% in patients without PGH. Morbidity rates were 50% versus 48% and length of hospital stay was 23 versus 21 days for patients with and without PGH, respectively, with no statistical differences between the groups. Endoscopic approach to control PGH was successful in nine patients. Pancreatogastrostomies were not compromised regarding procedure or air insufflations and no concomitant development of pancreatic fistula was observed. Open surgery was inevitable in one patient with recurrent PGH in order to achieve hemostasis, but resulted in pancreatic fistula and protracted hospital stay.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates a feasible endoscopic approach for the management of PGH with high success rate and no concomitant procedure-related morbidity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Koukoutsis I, Bellagamba R, Morris-Stiff G, Wickremesekera S, Coldham C, Wigmore SJ, Mayer AD, Mirza DF, Buckels JA, Bramhall SR (2006) Haemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the importance of sentinel bleed. Dig Surg 23:224–228PubMedCrossRef Koukoutsis I, Bellagamba R, Morris-Stiff G, Wickremesekera S, Coldham C, Wigmore SJ, Mayer AD, Mirza DF, Buckels JA, Bramhall SR (2006) Haemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the importance of sentinel bleed. Dig Surg 23:224–228PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanc T, Cortes A, Goere D, Sibert A, Pessaux P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A (2007) Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: when is surgery still indicated? Am J Surg 194:3–9PubMedCrossRef Blanc T, Cortes A, Goere D, Sibert A, Pessaux P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A (2007) Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: when is surgery still indicated? Am J Surg 194:3–9PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471 Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Gutt CN, Buchler MW, Friess H (2006) Management of early hemorrhage from pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 23:203–208PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Gutt CN, Buchler MW, Friess H (2006) Management of early hemorrhage from pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 23:203–208PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Z’graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Buchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737PubMedCrossRef Z’graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Buchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Standop J, Overhaus M, Schaefer N, Decker D, Wolff M, Hirner A, Tuerler A (2005) Pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a safe, feasible reconstruction method? World J Surg 29:505–512PubMedCrossRef Standop J, Overhaus M, Schaefer N, Decker D, Wolff M, Hirner A, Tuerler A (2005) Pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a safe, feasible reconstruction method? World J Surg 29:505–512PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor S (2006) Haemorrhage following pancreatoduodenectomy: the importance of surgery. Dig Surg 23:201–202PubMedCrossRef Connor S (2006) Haemorrhage following pancreatoduodenectomy: the importance of surgery. Dig Surg 23:201–202PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Salena BJ, Laine LA (1992) Endoscopic therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 102:139–148PubMed Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Salena BJ, Laine LA (1992) Endoscopic therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 102:139–148PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung JJ, Tsoi KK, Lai LH, Wu JC, Lau JY (2007) Endoscopic clipping versus injection and thermo-coagulation in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gut 56:1364–1373PubMedCrossRef Sung JJ, Tsoi KK, Lai LH, Wu JC, Lau JY (2007) Endoscopic clipping versus injection and thermo-coagulation in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gut 56:1364–1373PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert JP (2007) Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005584. Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert JP (2007) Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005584.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Bianco MA, D’Angella R, Cipolletta L (2007) Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 102:279–289PubMedCrossRef Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Bianco MA, D’Angella R, Cipolletta L (2007) Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 102:279–289PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM, Kaifi J, Schurr PG, Bubenheim M, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G, Izbicki JR (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280PubMedCrossRef Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM, Kaifi J, Schurr PG, Bubenheim M, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G, Izbicki JR (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Doig C, Dort J, Vollmer CM Jr, Dixon E (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:929–936PubMedCrossRef McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Doig C, Dort J, Vollmer CM Jr, Dixon E (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:929–936PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD (2004) Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 8:951–959PubMedCrossRef Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD (2004) Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 8:951–959PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS, Joh JW, Kim YI (2004) Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199:186–191PubMedCrossRef Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS, Joh JW, Kim YI (2004) Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199:186–191PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–8PubMedCrossRef van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–8PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA (2007) Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 245:777–783PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA (2007) Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 245:777–783PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Endoscopic management of anastomotic hemorrhage from pancreatogastrostomy
verfasst von
Jens Standop
Nico Schäfer
Marcus Overhaus
Volker Schmitz
Lissie Ladwein
Andreas Hirner
Jörg C. Kalff
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0235-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.