Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2009

01.06.2009 | New Technology

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Scarless cholecystectomy

verfasst von: Tae Ho Hong, Young Kyoung You, Keun Ho Lee

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Many laparoscopic surgeons have been attempting to reduce incisional morbidity and improve cosmetic outcomes by using fewer and smaller ports. We performed transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUSPLC) in 15 patients with cholelithiasis by using a special “single-port” with virtually no scar.

Methods

We used an extra-small wound retractor and a surgical glove as the “single-port.” The wound retractor was set up through the small umbilical incision and the surgical glove attached with one trocar and two pipes was then fixed to the outer ring of the wound retractor. The commonly used trocar and two slim pipes attached to the surgical glove served as three working channels. Using this single-port and conventional laparoscopic instruments, such as a straight 5-mm dissector, grasper, scissors, and a 30-degree 5-mm rigid laparoscope, we performed TUSPLC in 15 patients with cholelithiasis. The overall procedure was similar to three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results

Fifteen well-selected patients with cholelithiasis underwent TUSPLC (4 males and 11 females; mean age, 39 (range, 29–63) years). Body mass index ranged from 20 to 34 (mean, 25.2). No case required extra-umbilical skin incisions or conversion to standard laparoscopy. The mean operative time was 79 (range, 35–165) min. Blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.6 (range, 1.0–2.5) days. No postoperative complications were observed.

Conclusions

The results of our initial experience of TUSPLC in 15 well-selected patients with cholelithiasis are encouraging. All procedures were completed successfully within a reasonable time. No extra-umbilical incisions were used and virtually no scar remained. TUSPLC could be a promising alternative method for the treatment of some patients with symptomatic gallstone disease as scarless abdominal surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu SC, Yuan RH, Chen SC, Lee WJ (1999) Combined use of mini-laparoscope and conventional laparoscope in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preservation of minimal invasiveness. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:57–62PubMedCrossRef Yu SC, Yuan RH, Chen SC, Lee WJ (1999) Combined use of mini-laparoscope and conventional laparoscope in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preservation of minimal invasiveness. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:57–62PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 16:458–464PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 16:458–464PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne DA, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos EE (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: past, present, and future. Surg Technol Int 15:81–85PubMed Osborne DA, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos EE (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: past, present, and future. Surg Technol Int 15:81–85PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2003) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 90:1345–1348PubMedCrossRef Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2003) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 90:1345–1348PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW (2005) Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J 11:30–35PubMed Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW (2005) Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J 11:30–35PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K (2007) Needlescopic cholecystectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:375–379PubMedCrossRef Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K (2007) Needlescopic cholecystectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:375–379PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kagaya T (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “Twin-Port” system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:76–80PubMedCrossRef Kagaya T (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “Twin-Port” system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:76–80PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon CM, Chan KW, Ko CW, Chan KC, Lee DW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2002) Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial results of a modified technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:259–262PubMedCrossRef Poon CM, Chan KW, Ko CW, Chan KC, Lee DW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2002) Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial results of a modified technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:259–262PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G (2000) Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:32–36PubMedCrossRef Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G (2000) Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:32–36PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21:2308–2316PubMedCrossRef Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21:2308–2316PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22:1427–1429PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22:1427–1429PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearl JP, Ponsky JL (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1293–1300PubMedCrossRef Pearl JP, Ponsky JL (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1293–1300PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6PubMedCrossRef Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40:428–431PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40:428–431PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sclabas GM, Swain P, Swanstrom LL (2006) Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13:23–30PubMedCrossRef Sclabas GM, Swain P, Swanstrom LL (2006) Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13:23–30PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364PubMedCrossRef Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuesta MA, Berends F, Veenhof AA (2007) The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9588-y Cuesta MA, Berends F, Veenhof AA (2007) The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc doi:10.​1007/​s00464-007-9588-y
Metadaten
Titel
Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Scarless cholecystectomy
verfasst von
Tae Ho Hong
Young Kyoung You
Keun Ho Lee
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0252-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.