Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2008

01.12.2008

Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Albert C. Y. Chan, Jensen T. C. Poon, Joe K. M. Fan, Siu Hung Lo, Wai Lun Law

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Long-term outcome of patients with conversion following laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer has seldom been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of conversion on the operative outcome and survival of patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy.

Methods

An analysis of a prospectively collected database of 470 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy between May 2000 and December 2006 was performed. The operative results and long-term outcomes of patients with conversion were compared with those with successful laparoscopic operations.

Results

The overall conversion rate to open surgery was 8.7% (41 patients). There was no difference in age, comorbid illness, location of tumor, and stage of disease between the laparoscopic and conversion groups. The most common reasons for conversion include adhesions (34.1%), tumor invasion into adjacent structures (17.1%), bulky tumor (9.8%), and uncontrolled hemorrhage (9.8%). A male preponderance was observed in the conversion group. Tumor size was significantly larger in the conversion group compared with the laparoscopic group (5 versus 4 cm, P = 0.002). Although there was no difference in the operative time between the two groups, increased perioperative blood loss (461.9 vs. 191.2 ml, P < 0.001), increased postoperative complication rate (56.1% versus 16.7%, P = 0.001) and prolonged median hospital stay (10 versus 6 days, P < 0.001) were associated with the conversion group. Consequently, patients in the conversion group were more likely to develop local recurrence (9.8% versus 2.8%, P < 0.001) with a significantly reduced cumulative cancer-free survival.

Conclusion

The disease-free survival and the local recurrence were significantly worse by the presence of conversion in laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy. Adoption of a standardized operative strategy may improve the perioperative outcome after conversion.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735PubMedCrossRef Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR et al (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132(1):41–44; discussion 45PubMed Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR et al (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132(1):41–44; discussion 45PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M et al (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15(8):827–832PubMedCrossRef Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M et al (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15(8):827–832PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14(12):1114–1117PubMedCrossRef Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14(12):1114–1117PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):197–204PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):197–204PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1680–1685PubMedCrossRef Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1680–1685PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20(6):947–951PubMedCrossRef Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20(6):947–951PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):207–214; discussion 214–6PubMedCrossRef Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):207–214; discussion 214–6PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139(1):39–42PubMedCrossRef Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139(1):39–42PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M et al (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11(4):331–335PubMedCrossRef Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M et al (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11(4):331–335PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 199(5):675–679PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 199(5):675–679PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):503–509PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):503–509PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer
verfasst von
Albert C. Y. Chan
Jensen T. C. Poon
Joe K. M. Fan
Siu Hung Lo
Wai Lun Law
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9813-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.