Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2009

01.01.2009

Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices

verfasst von: William L. Newcomb, William W. Hope, Thomas M. Schmelzer, Jessica J. Heath, H. James Norton, Amy E. Lincourt, B. Todd Heniford, David A. Iannitti

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Bipolar electrosurgical devices and ultrasonic devices are routinely used in open and advanced laparoscopic surgery for hemostasis. New electrosurgical and ultrasonic instruments demonstrate improved quality and efficiency in blood vessel sealing.

Methods

The 5-mm laparoscopic Gyrus PKS™ Cutting Forceps (PK), Gyrus Plasma Trissector™ (GP), Harmonic Scalpel® (HS), EnSeal™ Tissue Sealing and Hemostasis System (RX), LigaSure™ V with LigaSure™ Vessel Sealing Generator (LS), LigaSure™ V with Force Triad™ Generator (FT), and Ligamax™ 5 Endoscopic Multiple Clip Applier (LM) were tested to compare burst pressure, sealing time, and failure rate. Each device was used to seal 13 small (2–3 mm diameter), 13 medium (4–5 mm diameter), and 13 large (6–7 mm diameter) arteries from euthanized pigs. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Mean burst pressures were not statistically different for 2–3 mm or 6–7 mm vessels. For 4–5 mm vessels, LS had the highest mean burst pressure recorded. Mean seal times were shorter for every vessel size when FT was compared with LS (p < 0.05). The shortest sealing times for 2–3 mm vessels were recorded for GP. The shortest sealing times for medium and large vessels were observed with FT. The highest percentage failure rate for each vessel size occurred with GP. For 4–5 mm diameter vessels, the failure rate was 48% for GP, 41% for PK, and 22% for HS. For 6–7 mm diameter vessels, the failure rate was 92% for GP, 41% for PK, and 8% for HS. LM and FT had no recorded failures.

Conclusion

Among the new 5-mm laparoscopic electrosurgical and ultrasonic instruments available for testing, RX, LS, and FT produced the highest mean burst pressures. FT had the shortest mean seal times for medium and large vessels. Minimal or no seal failures occurred with HS, RX, LS, LM, and FT.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey DP (2006) Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg 202:520–530PubMedCrossRef Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey DP (2006) Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg 202:520–530PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Harold K L, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 17:1228–1230PubMedCrossRef Harold K L, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 17:1228–1230PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG (1998) High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 12:876–878PubMedCrossRef Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG (1998) High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 12:876–878PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrell AG, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2004) Energy sources in laparoscopy. Semin Laparosc Surg 11:201–209PubMed Harrell AG, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2004) Energy sources in laparoscopy. Semin Laparosc Surg 11:201–209PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:377–380PubMedCrossRef Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:377–380PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Denes B, de la Torre RA, Krummel TM, Oleson LSM (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system in a porcine model. In 21st World Congress of Endourology, Moderated poster session, Endourology/Laproscopy: Laboratory & Teaching Montreal, Canada Denes B, de la Torre RA, Krummel TM, Oleson LSM (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system in a porcine model. In 21st World Congress of Endourology, Moderated poster session, Endourology/Laproscopy: Laboratory & Teaching Montreal, Canada
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, Andreoni C, Humphrey PA, Collyer W, Olweny E, Sundaram C, Clayman RV (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 169:697–700PubMedCrossRef Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, Andreoni C, Humphrey PA, Collyer W, Olweny E, Sundaram C, Clayman RV (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 169:697–700PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gozen AS, Teber D, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Principles and initial experience of a new device for dissection and hemostasis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 16:58–65PubMedCrossRef Gozen AS, Teber D, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Principles and initial experience of a new device for dissection and hemostasis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 16:58–65PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CL, Huang KG, Wang CJ, Lee PS, Hwang LL (2007) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Gynecol Oncol 105:620–624PubMedCrossRef Lee CL, Huang KG, Wang CJ, Lee PS, Hwang LL (2007) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Gynecol Oncol 105:620–624PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Spivak H, Richardson WS, Hunter JG (1998) The use of bipolar cautery, laparosonic coagulating shears, and vascular clips for hemostasis of small and medium-sized vessels. Surg Endosc 12:183–185PubMedCrossRef Spivak H, Richardson WS, Hunter JG (1998) The use of bipolar cautery, laparosonic coagulating shears, and vascular clips for hemostasis of small and medium-sized vessels. Surg Endosc 12:183–185PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Diamantis T, Kontos M, Arvelakis A, Syroukis S, Koronarchis D, Papalois A, Agapitos E, Bastounis E, Lazaris AC (2006) Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure. Surg Today 36:908–913PubMedCrossRef Diamantis T, Kontos M, Arvelakis A, Syroukis S, Koronarchis D, Papalois A, Agapitos E, Bastounis E, Lazaris AC (2006) Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure. Surg Today 36:908–913PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell PA, Cresswell AB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (2003) Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection. Surg Endosc 17:1640–1645PubMedCrossRef Campbell PA, Cresswell AB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (2003) Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection. Surg Endosc 17:1640–1645PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinoshita T, Kanehira E, Omura K, Kawakami K, Watanabe Y (1999) Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5-kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:621–625PubMedCrossRef Kinoshita T, Kanehira E, Omura K, Kawakami K, Watanabe Y (1999) Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5-kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:621–625PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Emam TA, Cuschieri A (2003) How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection? Ann Surg 237:186–191PubMedCrossRef Emam TA, Cuschieri A (2003) How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection? Ann Surg 237:186–191PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahin DA, Kusaslan R, Sahin O, Akbulut G, Bas O, Dilek ON (2007) Histopathological effects of bipolar vessel sealing devices on liver parenchyma and comparison with suture method: an experimental study. Eur Surg Res 39:111–117PubMedCrossRef Sahin DA, Kusaslan R, Sahin O, Akbulut G, Bas O, Dilek ON (2007) Histopathological effects of bipolar vessel sealing devices on liver parenchyma and comparison with suture method: an experimental study. Eur Surg Res 39:111–117PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Campagnacci R, de Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, Rimini M, Lezoche G, Guerrieri M (2007) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 21:1526–1531PubMedCrossRef Campagnacci R, de Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, Rimini M, Lezoche G, Guerrieri M (2007) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 21:1526–1531PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J, Neto RB, Martinez C, Garriga J, Trias M (2005) Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov 12:339–344PubMedCrossRef Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J, Neto RB, Martinez C, Garriga J, Trias M (2005) Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov 12:339–344PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices
verfasst von
William L. Newcomb
William W. Hope
Thomas M. Schmelzer
Jessica J. Heath
H. James Norton
Amy E. Lincourt
B. Todd Heniford
David A. Iannitti
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9932-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.