Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2009

01.10.2009

EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies as first-line diagnostic method for patients with intestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions

verfasst von: Ulrich Wahnschaffe, Reiner Ullrich, Julia Mayerle, Markus M. Lerch, Martin Zeitz, Siegbert Faiss

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a well-established technique to obtain cytological specimens, but it does not permit the extraction of histological tissue-core samples, which, if available, may increase the yield and accuracy of the histopathological diagnosis. This prospective study was designed to assess the yield and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut needle biopsy (TNB) as first-line diagnostic method for suspected malignant lesions identified by upper gastrointestinal EUS.

Methods

In a prospective case series, 24 consecutive patients (14 women; median age, 68 (range, 38–84) years) with suspected malignancy underwent EUS-TNB with a 19-gauge needle. EUS was performed with a linear scanning echo endoscope. When the EUS-TNB device did not collect adequate samples, subsequent EUS-FNA was performed. The presence or absence of malignancy was confirmed by postoperative histopathology or diagnostic imaging follow-up for at least 9 months.

Results

Adequate tissue specimens were obtained in 20 of 24 (83%) patients by TNB. An accurate diagnosis was achieved in 19 of 20 (95%) patients in whom TNB was successful with a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 100%, respectively. In 11 patients malignant disease was found, whereas 8 patients showed benign lesions on TNB-obtained histopathology. Thirteen patients underwent additional EUS-FNA. The diagnosis by TNB was confirmed in seven of nine (78%) patients with additional FNA. In three of four patients with inadequate TNB, the diagnosis was established by FNA. The overall accuracy of EUS-TNB was 79% (19/24) for all patients and 92% (22/24) with subsequent FNA. The positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of a malignant lesion by EUS-TNB were 57.9% and 88.9%, respectively. Neither method had any procedure-related complications.

Conclusions

EUS-guided TNB is a safe and accurate technique to obtain core specimen for histopathologic diagnosis in patients with suspected malignancies on upper gastrointestinal EUS. FNA can serve as rescue technique and should be performed if TNB fails to obtain adequate tissue samples.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah JN, Ahmad NA, Beilstein MC, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML (2004) Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on the management of malignancies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:1069–1073CrossRefPubMed Shah JN, Ahmad NA, Beilstein MC, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML (2004) Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on the management of malignancies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:1069–1073CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Savides TJ, Donohue M, Hunt G, Al-Haddad M, Aslanian H, Ben-Menachem T, Chen VK, Coyle W, Deutsch J, DeWitt J, Dhawan M, Eckardt A, Eloubeidi M, Esker A, Gordon SR, Gress F, Ikenberry S, Joyce AM, Klapman J, Lo S, Maluf-Filho F, Nickl N, Singh V, Wills J, Behling C (2007) EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc 66:277–282CrossRefPubMed Savides TJ, Donohue M, Hunt G, Al-Haddad M, Aslanian H, Ben-Menachem T, Chen VK, Coyle W, Deutsch J, DeWitt J, Dhawan M, Eckardt A, Eloubeidi M, Esker A, Gordon SR, Gress F, Ikenberry S, Joyce AM, Klapman J, Lo S, Maluf-Filho F, Nickl N, Singh V, Wills J, Behling C (2007) EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc 66:277–282CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mortensen MB, Pless T, Durup J, Ainsworth AP, Plagborg GJ, Hovendal C (2001) Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study. Endoscopy 33:478–483CrossRefPubMed Mortensen MB, Pless T, Durup J, Ainsworth AP, Plagborg GJ, Hovendal C (2001) Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study. Endoscopy 33:478–483CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Iglesias Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy for the evaluation of pancreatic tumors. Gastroenterol Hepatol 30:597–601CrossRefPubMed Iglesias Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy for the evaluation of pancreatic tumors. Gastroenterol Hepatol 30:597–601CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Guldhammer Skov B, Georgescu CV (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 42:117–125CrossRefPubMed Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Guldhammer Skov B, Georgescu CV (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 42:117–125CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Jhala N, Chhieng D, Jhala D, Crowe DR, Eltoum IA (2006) Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2841–2847CrossRefPubMed Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Jhala N, Chhieng D, Jhala D, Crowe DR, Eltoum IA (2006) Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2841–2847CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, Wiersema MJ (2003) Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided Trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 57:101–106CrossRefPubMed Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, Wiersema MJ (2003) Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided Trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 57:101–106CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, Roberts S, Wildi S, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Wallace MB (2004) Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 36:397–401CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, Roberts S, Wildi S, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Wallace MB (2004) Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 36:397–401CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Tao LC, Wiersema LM, Kopecky KK, Rex DK, Kumar S, Lehman GA (1992) Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 38:35–39CrossRefPubMed Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Tao LC, Wiersema LM, Kopecky KK, Rex DK, Kumar S, Lehman GA (1992) Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 38:35–39CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gines A, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, Pochron NL, Rajan E, Levy MJ (2005) Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointest Endosc 62:597–601CrossRefPubMed Gines A, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, Pochron NL, Rajan E, Levy MJ (2005) Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointest Endosc 62:597–601CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat DeWitt J, McGreevy K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Cummings O, Sherman S (2005) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy of suspected nonfocal chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 62:76–84CrossRefPubMed DeWitt J, McGreevy K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Cummings O, Sherman S (2005) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy of suspected nonfocal chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 62:76–84CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Tam W, Dean J, Zaitoun A, Kocjan G, Ragunath K, Pereira SP (2007) EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of “dual sampling” (Trucut biopsy plus FNA) with “sequential sampling” (Trucut biopsy and then FNA as required). Endoscopy 39:725–730CrossRefPubMed Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Tam W, Dean J, Zaitoun A, Kocjan G, Ragunath K, Pereira SP (2007) EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of “dual sampling” (Trucut biopsy plus FNA) with “sequential sampling” (Trucut biopsy and then FNA as required). Endoscopy 39:725–730CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN, Deheragoda M, Pereira SP (2006) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and Trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study. Cytopathology 17:27–33CrossRefPubMed Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN, Deheragoda M, Pereira SP (2006) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and Trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study. Cytopathology 17:27–33CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD (2004) EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 59:185–190CrossRefPubMed Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD (2004) EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 59:185–190CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A, Nakamura K, Tsuchida A, Yamao K, Kawai T, Moriyasu F (2005) Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy 37:362–366CrossRefPubMed Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A, Nakamura K, Tsuchida A, Yamao K, Kawai T, Moriyasu F (2005) Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy 37:362–366CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pungpapong S, Wallace MB (2005) EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsy: is more tissue really better? Gastrointest Endosc 62:602–604CrossRefPubMed Pungpapong S, Wallace MB (2005) EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsy: is more tissue really better? Gastrointest Endosc 62:602–604CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy MJ, Reddy RP, Wiersema MJ, Smyrk TC, Clain JE, Harewood GC, Pearson RK, Rajan E, Topazian MD, Yusuf TE, Chari ST, Petersen BT (2005) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy in establishing autoimmune pancreatitis as the cause of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc 61:467–472CrossRefPubMed Levy MJ, Reddy RP, Wiersema MJ, Smyrk TC, Clain JE, Harewood GC, Pearson RK, Rajan E, Topazian MD, Yusuf TE, Chari ST, Petersen BT (2005) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy in establishing autoimmune pancreatitis as the cause of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc 61:467–472CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav D, Levy MJ, Schwartz D, Jondal ML, Clain J, Wiersema MJ (2003) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy for diagnosis of an esophageal stromal tumor: case report. Gastrointest Endosc 58:457–460PubMed Yadav D, Levy MJ, Schwartz D, Jondal ML, Clain J, Wiersema MJ (2003) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy for diagnosis of an esophageal stromal tumor: case report. Gastrointest Endosc 58:457–460PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribeiro A, Vernon S, Quintela P (2004) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy with immunohistochemical analysis of a gastric stromal tumor. Gastrointest Endosc 60:645–648CrossRefPubMed Ribeiro A, Vernon S, Quintela P (2004) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy with immunohistochemical analysis of a gastric stromal tumor. Gastrointest Endosc 60:645–648CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gleeson F, Clarke E, Kelly S, Hargadan G, Kenny E, MacMathuna P, Lennon J (2005) Diagnosis by EUS Trucut biopsy of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a patient with Crohn’s disease treated with infliximab. Gastrointest Endosc 61:489–492CrossRefPubMed Gleeson F, Clarke E, Kelly S, Hargadan G, Kenny E, MacMathuna P, Lennon J (2005) Diagnosis by EUS Trucut biopsy of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a patient with Crohn’s disease treated with infliximab. Gastrointest Endosc 61:489–492CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Kaye P (2005) EUS-guided Trucut mural biopsies in the investigation of unexplained thickening of the esophagogastric wall. Gastrointest Endosc 62:624–629CrossRefPubMed Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Kaye P (2005) EUS-guided Trucut mural biopsies in the investigation of unexplained thickening of the esophagogastric wall. Gastrointest Endosc 62:624–629CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Storch I, Shah M, Thurer R, Donna E, Ribeiro A (2008) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: when tissue is the issue. Surg Endosc 22:86–90 Epub 2007 May 4CrossRefPubMed Storch I, Shah M, Thurer R, Donna E, Ribeiro A (2008) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: when tissue is the issue. Surg Endosc 22:86–90 Epub 2007 May 4CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R, Raez L, Rocha-Lima C, Vernon S, Ribeiro A (2006) Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest Endosc 64:505–511CrossRefPubMed Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R, Raez L, Rocha-Lima C, Vernon S, Ribeiro A (2006) Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest Endosc 64:505–511CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies as first-line diagnostic method for patients with intestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions
verfasst von
Ulrich Wahnschaffe
Reiner Ullrich
Julia Mayerle
Markus M. Lerch
Martin Zeitz
Siegbert Faiss
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0345-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.