Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2010

01.02.2010

Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery

verfasst von: J. Esteban Varela, Samuel E. Wilson, Ninh T. Nguyen

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are nosocomial infectious complications causing significant morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs. Recently, the US Department of Human Health Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services outlined measures intended to decrease and prevent hospital-acquired infections such as SSI. This study aimed to compare the incidence of SSI after laparoscopic and open surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a large administrative, clinical, and financial database (University Health System Consortium) of US Academic Medical Centers and affiliated community hospitals was conducted. Patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 94,665) or open (n = 36,965) appendectomy, cholecystectomy, antireflux surgery, or gastric bypass between 2004 and 2008 were included in the analysis. The main outcome measure was inpatient diagnosis of SSI after laparoscopic and open surgery.

Results

During the 45-month study period, a total of 131,630 patients underwent one of four selected procedures. Overall, the incidence of SSI was significantly lower in laparoscopic (483 of 94,665, 0.5%) than in open (669 of 36,965, 1.8%) surgery (p < 0.01). Largely, laparoscopic techniques offered a protective effect against SSI (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25–0.31). Patients treated with laparoscopy were 72% less likely to experience an SSI. This protective effect was shown to be sustained after stratification by severity of illness (minor: OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14–0.26; moderate: OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.25–0.35; major/extreme: OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54–0.79), admission status (elective: OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20–0.31; urgent: OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28–0.53; emergent: OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25–0.34), and wound classification (dirty wounds: OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37–0.54).

Conclusions

In US academic medical centers, laparoscopy significantly reduces SSI. Patients treated with laparoscopic procedures are less likely to experience SSI. After stratification by severity of illness, admission status, and wound classification, laparoscopic techniques showed a protective effect against SSI.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Martone WJ, Gaynes RP, Horan TC, Danzig L, Emori TG, Monnet D, Stroud LA, Wright GC, Culver DH, Banerjee SN (1995) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) semiannual report, 1995: a report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Am J Infect Control 236:377–385 Martone WJ, Gaynes RP, Horan TC, Danzig L, Emori TG, Monnet D, Stroud LA, Wright GC, Culver DH, Banerjee SN (1995) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) semiannual report, 1995: a report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Am J Infect Control 236:377–385
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical-site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132CrossRefPubMed Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical-site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 20:271–274CrossRefPubMed Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 20:271–274CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Emori TG, Gaynes RP (1993) An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 6:428–442PubMed Emori TG, Gaynes RP (1993) An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 6:428–442PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulsen KB, Bremmelgaard A, Sørensen AI, Raahave D, Petersen JV (1994) Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections: a case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect 113:283–295CrossRefPubMed Poulsen KB, Bremmelgaard A, Sørensen AI, Raahave D, Petersen JV (1994) Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections: a case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect 113:283–295CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ (1999) The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:725–730CrossRefPubMed Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ (1999) The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:725–730CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Herwaldt LA, Cullen JJ, Scholz D, French P, Zimmerman MB, Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP, Perl TM (2006) A prospective study of outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and costs associated with postoperative nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:1291–1298CrossRefPubMed Herwaldt LA, Cullen JJ, Scholz D, French P, Zimmerman MB, Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP, Perl TM (2006) A prospective study of outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and costs associated with postoperative nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:1291–1298CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V, Petignat C, Francioli P, Troillet N (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical-site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632CrossRefPubMed Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V, Petignat C, Francioli P, Troillet N (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical-site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824CrossRefPubMed Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186CrossRefPubMed Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, Sawyer RG, Foley EF (2004) Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 239:599–605CrossRefPubMed Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, Sawyer RG, Foley EF (2004) Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 239:599–605CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela JE, Asolati M, Huerta S, Anthony T (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopy and open colectomy at academic centers. Am J Surg 196:403–406CrossRefPubMed Varela JE, Asolati M, Huerta S, Anthony T (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopy and open colectomy at academic centers. Am J Surg 196:403–406CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela JE, Hiyashi M, Nguyen T, Sabio A, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Am J Surg 192:837–842CrossRefPubMed Varela JE, Hiyashi M, Nguyen T, Sabio A, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Am J Surg 192:837–842CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196:218–222CrossRefPubMed Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196:218–222CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Hinojosa M, Fayad C, Varela E, Wilson SE (2007) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers. J Am Coll Surg 205:248–255CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Hinojosa M, Fayad C, Varela E, Wilson SE (2007) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers. J Am Coll Surg 205:248–255CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ann Surg 237:358–362CrossRefPubMed Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ann Surg 237:358–362CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5:89–94PubMed Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5:89–94PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C, Fleming N, Arango A, McFall R, Wolfe BM (2001) Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 192:469–476CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C, Fleming N, Arango A, McFall R, Wolfe BM (2001) Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 192:469–476CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Anderson JT, Palmer LS, Canet F, Wolfe BM (2001) Evaluation of intraabdominal pressure after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Obes Surg 11:40–45CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Anderson JT, Palmer LS, Canet F, Wolfe BM (2001) Evaluation of intraabdominal pressure after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Obes Surg 11:40–45CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Goldman CD, Ho HS, Gosselin RC, Singh A, Wolfe BM (2002) Systemic stress response after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 194:557–567CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Goldman CD, Ho HS, Gosselin RC, Singh A, Wolfe BM (2002) Systemic stress response after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 194:557–567CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wichmann MW, Hüttl TP, Winter H, Spelsberg F, Angele MK, Heiss MM, Jauch KW (2005) Immunological effects of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg 140:692–697CrossRefPubMed Wichmann MW, Hüttl TP, Winter H, Spelsberg F, Angele MK, Heiss MM, Jauch KW (2005) Immunological effects of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg 140:692–697CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD, Donahue J, Fowler R, Munger C, Doorman J, Balli JE, Glass J, Gonzalez JJ, Bessler M, Xie H, Treat M (2003) Postoperative cell-mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17:972–978CrossRefPubMed Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD, Donahue J, Fowler R, Munger C, Doorman J, Balli JE, Glass J, Gonzalez JJ, Bessler M, Xie H, Treat M (2003) Postoperative cell-mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17:972–978CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery
verfasst von
J. Esteban Varela
Samuel E. Wilson
Ninh T. Nguyen
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0569-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.