Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010

01.04.2010

Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery

verfasst von: Christopher M. Schlachta, Kevin L. Lefebvre, A. Kent Sorsdahl, Shiva Jayaraman

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A community surgery group was reviewed for 1 year after completion of a laparoscopic colon surgery mentoring program.

Methods

A formal mentoring protocol had been established between a university center and two surgeons at a community hospital. Over 18 months, concluding August 2007, surgeons were mentored and telementored through 20 laparoscopic colon resections in their local setting. Surgeons tracked their cases for a further 12 months after the mentoring.

Results

From September 2007 to August 2008, 30 colon resections were performed. Three of these resections (1 laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for fistula and 2 laparoscopic subtotal colectomies) were mentored and telementored as advanced procedures. Of the remaining 27 resections, 15 (56%) were laparoscopic procedures including 9 right and 5 sigmoid colectomies as well as 1 subtotal colectomy. The 15 laparascopic colon resections were performed for cancer (n = 6), polyps (n = 5), diverticular disease (n = 2), Crohn’s disease (n = 1), and colonic inertia (n = 1). Five cases were converted to open surgery (33%) due to adhesions (n = 3), unclear anatomy (n = 1), and equipment failure (n = 1). The mean number of lymph nodes in the cancer cases was 15.3 ± 3.8. Minor postoperative complications occurred in seven cases (47%), three of which involved conversions. These complications included ileus (n = 4), wound abscess (n = 2), cardiac arrhythmia (n = 1), anastomotic bleed (n = 1), and abscess (n = 1). The patients selected for open surgery consisted of seven right and three sigmoid colectomies as well as a splenic flexure resection and a dual resection. The rationale for these open surgeries were transverse colon cancer (n = 4), medical comorbidity (n = 3), colovesicle fistulas (n = 2), rectal lesion (n = 2), and carcinoid tumor (n = 1). The laparoscopic patients were younger (58.2 ± 13.2 vs 73.8 ± 10.6 years; P = 0.003), had longer operating times (124 ± 28 vs 94 ± 38 min; P = 0.026), and a shorter median hospital stay (3 vs 7 days; P = 0.006). The laparoscopic operating time improved over the mentoring experience (124 ± 28 vs 150 ± 43 min; P = 0.046).

Conclusion

The 1-year follow-up evaluation after a longitudinal mentoring program demonstrates excellent incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery into a community practice with appropriate case selection, quality cancer surgery, and a moderate conversion rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fowler DL, White SA (1991) Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:183–188PubMed Fowler DL, White SA (1991) Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:183–188PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kemp JA, Finlayson SR (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy: a national population-based comparison. Surg Innov 15:277–283CrossRefPubMed Kemp JA, Finlayson SR (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy: a national population-based comparison. Surg Innov 15:277–283CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, Nelson H, Wang E, Ko CY, Soper NJ (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2001–2009CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, Nelson H, Wang E, Ko CY, Soper NJ (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2001–2009CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Karanicolas PJ, Dubois L, Colquhoun PHD, Swallow CJ, Walter SD, Guyatt GH (2009) The more the better? The impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection. Ann Surg 249(6):954–959CrossRefPubMed Karanicolas PJ, Dubois L, Colquhoun PHD, Swallow CJ, Walter SD, Guyatt GH (2009) The more the better? The impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection. Ann Surg 249(6):954–959CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta CM, Sorsdahl AK, Lefebvre K, McCune M, Jayaraman S (2009) A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1639–1643CrossRef Schlachta CM, Sorsdahl AK, Lefebvre K, McCune M, Jayaraman S (2009) A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1639–1643CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Birch DW, Misra M, Farrokhyar F (2007) The feasibility of introducing advanced minimally invasive surgery into surgical practice. Can J Surg 50:256–260PubMed Birch DW, Misra M, Farrokhyar F (2007) The feasibility of introducing advanced minimally invasive surgery into surgical practice. Can J Surg 50:256–260PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Birch DW, Asiri AH, de Gara CJ (2007) The impact of a formal mentoring program for minimally invasive surgery on surgeon practice and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 193:589–591CrossRefPubMed Birch DW, Asiri AH, de Gara CJ (2007) The impact of a formal mentoring program for minimally invasive surgery on surgeon practice and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 193:589–591CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Heniford BT, Backus CL, Matthews BD, Greene FL, Teel WB, Sing RF (2001) Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic splenectomy. Am J Surg 181:226–230CrossRefPubMed Heniford BT, Backus CL, Matthews BD, Greene FL, Teel WB, Sing RF (2001) Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic splenectomy. Am J Surg 181:226–230CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Box EA, Backus CL, Kercher KW, Greene FL, Sing RF (2002) Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy. Hernia 6:17–20CrossRefPubMed Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Box EA, Backus CL, Kercher KW, Greene FL, Sing RF (2002) Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy. Hernia 6:17–20CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2007) Are transverse colon cancers suitable for laparoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 21:396–399CrossRefPubMed Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2007) Are transverse colon cancers suitable for laparoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 21:396–399CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery
verfasst von
Christopher M. Schlachta
Kevin L. Lefebvre
A. Kent Sorsdahl
Shiva Jayaraman
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0674-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.