Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2010

01.09.2010

Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study

verfasst von: Massimiliano Fabozzi, Rosaldo Allieta, Riccardo Brachet Contul, Manuela Grivon, Paolo Millo, Elena Lale-Murix, Mario Nardi Jr.

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the short- and medium-term results obtained by totally laparoscopic right colectomy (TL) with those obtained by laparoscopically assisted right colectomy (LAC) for the treatment of right colon cancer.

Methods

A retrospective study compared two nonstatistically different groups (50 TL and 50 LAC cases) managed for nonmetastatic malignant tumors. The study outcomes included operative time, length of minilaparotomy, intraoperative complications, postoperative pain, time to resumption of the gastrointestinal functions, permanence of abdominal drain, analgesic therapy duration, postoperative complications, hospitalization time, number of harvested lymph nodes, and distant metastases onset.

Results

The mean operative times were 78 ± 25 min (TL group) and 92 ± 22 min (LAC group) (p < 0.05). The findings showed a lower postoperative pain level associated with a reduction in analgesic consumption (p > 0.05) and earlier restoration of digestive function in the TL group than in the LAC group. The mean hospital stays were approximately 5 days (TL) and 7 days (LAC) (p < 0.05). No complications occurred either intra- or postoperatively, and similarly, the TL group experienced no mortality. In comparison, the LAC group had a 30% complication rate (p < 0.05). The complications included one case of intraoperative small bowel lesion, three cases of postoperative respiratory infections, three cases of anastomotic leakage, two cases of intestinal occlusion, three cases of minilaparotomy infection, one case of postoperative femoral neurosis, one case of postoperative heart attack, and one case of postoperative pancreatitis. The mortality rate was 0%. Neither group had a recurrence of the neoplastic disease during a 4-year follow-up period.

Conclusions

The findings seem to demonstrate that TL right colectomy is feasible and safe, yielding results comparable with those of the open approach but offering improved postoperative patient comfort. The limits of this retrospective comparative study do not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn despite the encouraging data for the next prospective randomized studies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Alves A, Panis Y (2007) Tecnica della colectomia destra in laparoascopia. Encycl Méd Chir (EMC). Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris, Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale, pp 40–563 Bretagnol F, Alves A, Panis Y (2007) Tecnica della colectomia destra in laparoascopia. Encycl Méd Chir (EMC). Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris, Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale, pp 40–563
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang JT, Lai HS, Lee PH (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1878–1879CrossRefPubMed Liang JT, Lai HS, Lee PH (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1878–1879CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, Li JW, Wang ML, Mao ZH, Hu YY, Dong F, Hu WG, Li DH, Zang L, Peng YF, Yu BM (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11:323–326PubMed Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, Li JW, Wang ML, Mao ZH, Hu YY, Dong F, Hu WG, Li DH, Zang L, Peng YF, Yu BM (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11:323–326PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD003432 Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD003432
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahnamoui K, Cadeddu M, Farrokhyar F, Anvari M (2007) Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review. Can J Surg 50:48–57PubMed Kahnamoui K, Cadeddu M, Farrokhyar F, Anvari M (2007) Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review. Can J Surg 50:48–57PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lelong B, Bege T, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Delpero JR (2007) Colon cancer and laparoscopy: state of the art in 2007. Bull Cancer 94:1053–1058PubMed Lelong B, Bege T, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Delpero JR (2007) Colon cancer and laparoscopy: state of the art in 2007. Bull Cancer 94:1053–1058PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shatari T, Fujita M, Nozawa K, Haku K, Niimi M, Ikeda Y, Kann S, Kodaira S (2003) Vascular anatomy for right colon lymphadenectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 25:86–88CrossRefPubMed Shatari T, Fujita M, Nozawa K, Haku K, Niimi M, Ikeda Y, Kann S, Kodaira S (2003) Vascular anatomy for right colon lymphadenectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 25:86–88CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Netter FH; Atlante di Anatomia Fisiopatologia e Clinica (2002) Anatomia Fisiopatologia e clinica del Colon destro. Vol 6. Tomo 2. Ed. Elsevier Masson, Milano Netter FH; Atlante di Anatomia Fisiopatologia e Clinica (2002) Anatomia Fisiopatologia e clinica del Colon destro. Vol 6. Tomo 2. Ed. Elsevier Masson, Milano
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramacciato G, D’Angelo F, Aurello P, Nigri G, Valabrega S, Pezzoli F, Ravaioli M, Cescon M, Cucchetti A, Lauro A, Del Gaudio M, Ercolani G (2008) Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs open technique. Chir Ital 60:1–7PubMed Ramacciato G, D’Angelo F, Aurello P, Nigri G, Valabrega S, Pezzoli F, Ravaioli M, Cescon M, Cucchetti A, Lauro A, Del Gaudio M, Ercolani G (2008) Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs open technique. Chir Ital 60:1–7PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, Tang WL, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Li MK (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733CrossRefPubMed Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, Tang WL, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Li MK (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Casciola L, Ceccarelli G, Di Zitti L, Valeri R, Bellochi R, Bartoli A, Barbieri F, Spaziani A, D’Ajello M (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58:621–627PubMed Casciola L, Ceccarelli G, Di Zitti L, Valeri R, Bellochi R, Bartoli A, Barbieri F, Spaziani A, D’Ajello M (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58:621–627PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Raftopoulos I, Courcoulas AP, Blumberg D (2006) Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon? Surgery 140:675–682CrossRefPubMed Raftopoulos I, Courcoulas AP, Blumberg D (2006) Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon? Surgery 140:675–682CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergamaschi R, Schochet E, Haughn C, Burke M, Reed JF, Arnaud JP (2008) Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1350–1355CrossRefPubMed Bergamaschi R, Schochet E, Haughn C, Burke M, Reed JF, Arnaud JP (2008) Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1350–1355CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H (2009) Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:355–358CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H (2009) Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:355–358CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D, Chinswangwatanakul V, Akaraviputh T, Lert-Akyamanee N (2007) Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically assisted vs transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 5:49CrossRefPubMed Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D, Chinswangwatanakul V, Akaraviputh T, Lert-Akyamanee N (2007) Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically assisted vs transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 5:49CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ihara A, Onozato W, Sato T, Ozawa H, Hatade K, Watanabe M (2008) Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg 32:1138–1141CrossRefPubMed Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ihara A, Onozato W, Sato T, Ozawa H, Hatade K, Watanabe M (2008) Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg 32:1138–1141CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2006) Laparoscopic vs hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:464–469CrossRefPubMed Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2006) Laparoscopic vs hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:464–469CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA (2008) Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:1769–1780CrossRefPubMed Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA (2008) Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:1769–1780CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Li JC, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Leung KL (2009) The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 23:1603–1608CrossRefPubMed Li JC, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Leung KL (2009) The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 23:1603–1608CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Koopmann MC, Heise CP (2008) Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease. Surg Clin North Am 88:1047–1072CrossRefPubMed Koopmann MC, Heise CP (2008) Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease. Surg Clin North Am 88:1047–1072CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study
verfasst von
Massimiliano Fabozzi
Rosaldo Allieta
Riccardo Brachet Contul
Manuela Grivon
Paolo Millo
Elena Lale-Murix
Mario Nardi Jr.
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0902-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.