Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011

01.01.2011

Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure

verfasst von: Maik Sahm, Rainer Kube, Sybille Schmidt, Christina Ritter, Matthias Pross, Hans Lippert

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

An inadequate closure of the appendix stump leads to intra-abdominal surgical site infection. The effectiveness of various appendiceal stump closure methods, for instance, staplers or endoloops, was evaluated. Many analyses show that the use of a stapler for transection and closure of the appendiceal stump lowers the risk of this infection but a statistically significant risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess or wound infection was not considered in any randomized study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications after using endoloops in a high-volume center.

Methods

The data of 1,790 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 1998 and December 2006 and a single center was prospectively acquired. The standard procedure used was an appendiceal stump closure using endoloops and a selective use of staplers. The outcome criteria for inclusion in the study were intra-abdominal abscess formations, other specific intraoperative and postoperative complications, and the different costs of the operation.

Results

Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 1,790 (80.8%) patients and open appendectomy in 425 (19.2%) patients. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 74 (4.13%) patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy with stump closure using endoloops was performed in 1,670 (97.3%) patients and stump closure using a stapler in 46 (2.7%) patients. Among 851 patients with acute appendicitis, 284 patients with perforated appendicitis, and 535 patients with other or no pathology, the rate of intra-abdominal abscess after using an endoloop or a stapler was not significantly different (1.5 vs. 0%, p = 0.587; 3.5 vs. 4.2%, p = 0.870; 0.7% vs. 0, p = 0.881, respectively). There were no significant differences between the endoloop group and the stapler group with respect to the other specific intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Conclusion

This study shows the safety of the endoloop for clinical daily routine. A selective procedure for stump closure has been established. Appendiceal stump closure using an endoloop is an easy, safe, and cost-effective procedure.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanssen A, Plotnikov S, Dubois R (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. JSLS 11:59–62PubMed Hanssen A, Plotnikov S, Dubois R (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. JSLS 11:59–62PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18:749–750CrossRefPubMed Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18:749–750CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D (2006) Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 93:1390–1393CrossRefPubMed Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D (2006) Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 93:1390–1393CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chikamori F, Kuniyoshi N, Shibuya S, Takase Y (2002) Appendiceal stump abscess as an early complication of laparoscopic appendectomy: report of a case. Surg Today 32:919–921CrossRefPubMed Chikamori F, Kuniyoshi N, Shibuya S, Takase Y (2002) Appendiceal stump abscess as an early complication of laparoscopic appendectomy: report of a case. Surg Today 32:919–921CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL (2006) Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg 72:162–166PubMed Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL (2006) Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg 72:162–166PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Montali I, Klug S, von Flue M (2008) Right-sided lower abdominal pain after appendectomy? Chirurg 79:1077–1079CrossRefPubMed Montali I, Klug S, von Flue M (2008) Right-sided lower abdominal pain after appendectomy? Chirurg 79:1077–1079CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson J, Samaraweera AP, Sara RK, Lobo DN (2008) Acute appendicitis—a benign disease? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:313–316CrossRefPubMed Simpson J, Samaraweera AP, Sara RK, Lobo DN (2008) Acute appendicitis—a benign disease? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:313–316CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, Darzi A, Aylin P (2008) Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Ann Surg 248:800–806CrossRefPubMed Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, Darzi A, Aylin P (2008) Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Ann Surg 248:800–806CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214CrossRefPubMed Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller M, Terzic A, Rodehorst A, Mahfouz M, Bottger T (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy as training procedure for all stages of appendicitis. Zentralbl Chir 132:10–15CrossRefPubMed Muller M, Terzic A, Rodehorst A, Mahfouz M, Bottger T (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy as training procedure for all stages of appendicitis. Zentralbl Chir 132:10–15CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapischke M, Bley K, Tepel J, Schulz T (2005) Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis—a comparative study. Zentralbl Chir 130:137–141CrossRefPubMed Kapischke M, Bley K, Tepel J, Schulz T (2005) Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis—a comparative study. Zentralbl Chir 130:137–141CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Horstmann R, Tiwisina C, Classen C, Palmes D, Gillessen A (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques? Zentralbl Chir 130:48–54CrossRefPubMed Horstmann R, Tiwisina C, Classen C, Palmes D, Gillessen A (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques? Zentralbl Chir 130:48–54CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 15:660–662CrossRefPubMed Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 15:660–662CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kouwenhoven EA, Repelaer van Driel OJ, van Erp WF (2005) Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: not realistic. Surg Endosc 19:923–926CrossRefPubMed Kouwenhoven EA, Repelaer van Driel OJ, van Erp WF (2005) Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: not realistic. Surg Endosc 19:923–926CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Kubota D, Lee SH, Oba K, Matsuyama M (2007) Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis. Osaka City Med J 53:1–8PubMed Tanaka S, Kubota D, Lee SH, Oba K, Matsuyama M (2007) Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis. Osaka City Med J 53:1–8PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirano Y, Ishikawa N, Omura K, Inaki N, Hiranuma C, Waseda R, Watanabe G (2007) Robotic intragastric surgery: a new surgical approach for the gastric lesion. Surg Endosc 21:2112–2114CrossRefPubMed Hirano Y, Ishikawa N, Omura K, Inaki N, Hiranuma C, Waseda R, Watanabe G (2007) Robotic intragastric surgery: a new surgical approach for the gastric lesion. Surg Endosc 21:2112–2114CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212CrossRefPubMed Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4):90–93PubMed Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4):90–93PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc 20:1473–1476CrossRefPubMed Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc 20:1473–1476CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch A, Marusch F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2002) Appendicitis in the last decade of the 20th century—analysis of two prospective multicenter clinical observational studies. Zentralbl Chir 127:290–296CrossRefPubMed Koch A, Marusch F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2002) Appendicitis in the last decade of the 20th century—analysis of two prospective multicenter clinical observational studies. Zentralbl Chir 127:290–296CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritz JP, Stufler M, Buhr HJ (2007) Minimally invasive surgery and the economics of it. Can minimally invasive surgery be cost efficient from a business point of view? Chirurg 78:501–510CrossRefPubMed Ritz JP, Stufler M, Buhr HJ (2007) Minimally invasive surgery and the economics of it. Can minimally invasive surgery be cost efficient from a business point of view? Chirurg 78:501–510CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
verfasst von
Maik Sahm
Rainer Kube
Sybille Schmidt
Christina Ritter
Matthias Pross
Hans Lippert
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1144-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.