Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011

01.01.2011

Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial

verfasst von: Ke Gong, Nengwei Zhang, Yiping Lu, Bin Zhu, Zhanzhi Zhang, Dexiao Du, Xia Zhao, Haijun Jiang

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The open tension-free mesh-plug hernia technique, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique, and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic technique all are common surgical procedures for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. However, the choice of the right surgical procedure still is controversial in China. This study aimed to compare open tension-free hernioplasty with two laparoscopic hernia repairs.

Methods

In this study, 164 male patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo an open operation with mesh-plug and patch, TAPP, or TEP.

Results

Completion of the study required 3 years, from February 2006 to February 2009. Of the 164 patients, 62 underwent open repair, 50 had TAPP, and 52 had TEP. The patients then were followed up for 15.6 ± 8.5 months. The average operating time for the open repair group was significantly shorter than for the other two groups (p < 0.001). The cost for the open repair group also was significantly less than for the other two groups (p < 0.001). By contrast, the pain scores in the open mesh group were significantly higher than in the other two groups (p < 0.001). The hospital stay and the recovery time both were significantly longer in open repair group than in the other two groups (p < 0.001). No major complications or recurrence was found in any of the groups.

Conclusions

The findings show that open tension-free mesh-plug hernia repair, TAPP, and TEP are safe and effective for patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Both TAPP and TEP are superior to open repair in terms of less postoperative pain and faster recovery time. The authors therefore recommend laparoscopic repair techniques as the preferable choice of surgical procedure. However, they think open repair will remain a practical solution in China because of its lower cost, short learning period, and need for no special equipment.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pavlids TE (2010) Current opinion on laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24:974–976CrossRef Pavlids TE (2010) Current opinion on laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24:974–976CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) “Tension- free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” technique. Surgery 114:3–8PubMed Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) “Tension- free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” technique. Surgery 114:3–8PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1998) Classification system and groin hernia. Surg Clin North Am 78:1117–1127CrossRefPubMed Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1998) Classification system and groin hernia. Surg Clin North Am 78:1117–1127CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827CrossRefPubMed Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vale L, Ludbrook A, Grant A (2003) Assessing the costs and consequences of laparoscopic vs open methods of groin hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 17:844–849CrossRefPubMed Vale L, Ludbrook A, Grant A (2003) Assessing the costs and consequences of laparoscopic vs open methods of groin hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 17:844–849CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulucq J-L, Wintringer P, Mahajna (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3, 100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486CrossRefPubMed Dulucq J-L, Wintringer P, Mahajna (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3, 100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LÅ, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 249:33–38CrossRefPubMed Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LÅ, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 249:33–38CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Arregui ME, Young SB (2005) Groin hernia repair by laparoscopic techniques: current status and controversies. World J Surg 29:1052–1057CrossRefPubMed Arregui ME, Young SB (2005) Groin hernia repair by laparoscopic techniques: current status and controversies. World J Surg 29:1052–1057CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trail. Surg Endosc 19:188–199CrossRefPubMed Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trail. Surg Endosc 19:188–199CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dyer PJ (2004) Current status of the debate on laparoscopic hernia repair. Br Med Bull 70:105–118CrossRef O’Dyer PJ (2004) Current status of the debate on laparoscopic hernia repair. Br Med Bull 70:105–118CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pikoulis E, Daskalakis P, Psallidas N, Karavokyros I, Stathoulopolos A, Godevenos D, Leppaniemi A, Tsatsoulis P (2005) Marlex Mesh Prefix Plug hernioplasty: retrospective analysis of 865 operations. World J Surg 29:231–234CrossRefPubMed Pikoulis E, Daskalakis P, Psallidas N, Karavokyros I, Stathoulopolos A, Godevenos D, Leppaniemi A, Tsatsoulis P (2005) Marlex Mesh Prefix Plug hernioplasty: retrospective analysis of 865 operations. World J Surg 29:231–234CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler RE, Burke B, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA Jr (2007) The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21:387–390CrossRefPubMed Butler RE, Burke B, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA Jr (2007) The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21:387–390CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Román J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 230:225–231CrossRefPubMed Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Román J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 230:225–231CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zieren J, Hoksch B, Wenger FA, Opitz I, Müller JM (2001) Inguinal hernia repair in new millennium: plug and patch repair with local anesthesia. World J Surg 25:138–141CrossRefPubMed Zieren J, Hoksch B, Wenger FA, Opitz I, Müller JM (2001) Inguinal hernia repair in new millennium: plug and patch repair with local anesthesia. World J Surg 25:138–141CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pool AEM, Harlaar JJ, den Hoed PT, Weidema WF, van Veen RN (2010) Long-term follow-up evaluation of chronic pain after endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. Published online 7 January van der Pool AEM, Harlaar JJ, den Hoed PT, Weidema WF, van Veen RN (2010) Long-term follow-up evaluation of chronic pain after endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. Published online 7 January
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kocijan R, Sandberg S, Chan Y-W, Hollinsky C (2010) Anatomical changes after inguinal hernia treatment: a reason for chronic pain and recurrent hernia? Surg Endosc 24:395–399CrossRefPubMed Kocijan R, Sandberg S, Chan Y-W, Hollinsky C (2010) Anatomical changes after inguinal hernia treatment: a reason for chronic pain and recurrent hernia? Surg Endosc 24:395–399CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, Hop WC, Lange JF, Jeekel J (2007) Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus nonmesh primary inguinal hernia repair: long-term chronic pain at 10 years. Surgery 142:695–698CrossRefPubMed van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, Hop WC, Lange JF, Jeekel J (2007) Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus nonmesh primary inguinal hernia repair: long-term chronic pain at 10 years. Surgery 142:695–698CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fei L, Filippone G, Trapani V, Cuttitta D, lannuzzi E, lannuzzi M, Galizia G, Moccia F, Signoriello G (2006) Feasibility of primary inguinal hernia repair with a new mesh. World J Surg 30:1055–1062CrossRefPubMed Fei L, Filippone G, Trapani V, Cuttitta D, lannuzzi E, lannuzzi M, Galizia G, Moccia F, Signoriello G (2006) Feasibility of primary inguinal hernia repair with a new mesh. World J Surg 30:1055–1062CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanders DL, Samarakoon DH, Ganshirt SW, Porter CS, Kingsnorth AN (2009) A two-centre blinded randomized control study comparing the Lichtenstein patch, Perfix plug and ProLoop plug in the repair of primary inguinal hernia. Hernia 13:499–503CrossRefPubMed Sanders DL, Samarakoon DH, Ganshirt SW, Porter CS, Kingsnorth AN (2009) A two-centre blinded randomized control study comparing the Lichtenstein patch, Perfix plug and ProLoop plug in the repair of primary inguinal hernia. Hernia 13:499–503CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial
verfasst von
Ke Gong
Nengwei Zhang
Yiping Lu
Bin Zhu
Zhanzhi Zhang
Dexiao Du
Xia Zhao
Haijun Jiang
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.