Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011

01.04.2011

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis

verfasst von: Bo Wei, Cui-Lling Qi, Tu-Feng Chen, Zong-Heng Zheng, Jiang-Long Huang, Bao-Guang Hu, Hong-Bo Wei

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Currently, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) provides a safe and effective alternative to open appendectomy (OA), but its use remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of LA through a metaanalysis.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LA and OA published between January 1992 and February 2010 were included in this study. Strict literature appraisal and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers. A metaanalysis then was performed to evaluate operative time, hospital cost, postoperative complications, length of analgesia, bowel function recovery, day liquid diet began, hospital stay, and return to work and normal activity.

Results

The metaanalysis comprised 25 RCTs involving 4,694 patients (2,220 LA and 2,474 OA cases). No significant differences were found between the LA and OA groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), or type of appendiceal inflammation. Compared with OA, LA showed advantages of fewer postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55–0.98; p = 0.04), less pain (length of analgesia: weighted mean difference [WMD], −0.53; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.15; p = 0.007), earlier start of liquid diet (WMD, −0.51; 95% CI, −0.75 to −0.28; p < 0.0001), shorter hospital stay (WMD, −0.68; 95% CI, −1.02 to −0.35; p < 0.0001), and earlier return to work (WMD, −3.09; 95% CI, −5.22 to −0.97; p = 0.004) and normal activity (WMD, −4.73; 95% CI, −6.54 to −2.92; p < 0.00001), but a comparable hospital cost (WMD of LA/OA ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, −0.18 to 0.40; p = 0.47) and a longer operative time (WMD, 10.71; 95% CI, 6.76–14.66; p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Despite the longer operative time, LA results in less postoperative pain, faster postoperative rehabilitation, a shorter hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications than OA. Therefore, LA is worth recommending as an effective and safe procedure for acute appendicitis.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pier A, Gotz F, Bacher C (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:8–13PubMed Pier A, Gotz F, Bacher C (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:8–13PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Klingler A, Henle KP, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Wetscher GJ, Szinicz G (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg 175:232–235PubMedCrossRef Klingler A, Henle KP, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Wetscher GJ, Szinicz G (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg 175:232–235PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyö G, Graffner H, Hallerbäck B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 86:48–53PubMedCrossRef Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyö G, Graffner H, Hallerbäck B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 86:48–53PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, Fenoglio ME (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. South Med J 89:668–674PubMedCrossRef Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, Fenoglio ME (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. South Med J 89:668–674PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255PubMedCrossRef Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CB, Kim MS, Hong JH, Lee HY, Yu HS (2004) Is laparoscopic appendectomy useful for the treatment of acute appendicitis in Korea? A meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J 45:7–16PubMed Kim CB, Kim MS, Hong JH, Lee HY, Yu HS (2004) Is laparoscopic appendectomy useful for the treatment of acute appendicitis in Korea? A meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J 45:7–16PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg 19:518–522PubMedCrossRef Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg 19:518–522PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20:17–21PubMedCrossRef Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20:17–21PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12:1204–1208PubMedCrossRef Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12:1204–1208PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–450PubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–450PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Isaac JR (1993) Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 80:1599–1600PubMedCrossRef Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Isaac JR (1993) Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 80:1599–1600PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633–637PubMedCrossRef Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633–637PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD III, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–731PubMedCrossRef Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD III, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–731PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222:256–261 discussion 261–262PubMedCrossRef Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222:256–261 discussion 261–262PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266PubMedCrossRef Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF, Marescaux J (1996) Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 120:71–74PubMedCrossRef Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF, Marescaux J (1996) Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 120:71–74PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Minné L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132:708–712PubMed Minné L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132:708–712PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernández E, Nieto B (1997) Laproscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:335–339PubMedCrossRef Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernández E, Nieto B (1997) Laproscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:335–339PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11:336–340PubMedCrossRef Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11:336–340PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400PubMed Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205PubMedCrossRef Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514PubMedCrossRef Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18:242–245PubMedCrossRef Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18:242–245PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337PubMedCrossRef Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92:298–304PubMedCrossRef Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92:298–304PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19:1193–1195PubMedCrossRef Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19:1193–1195PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzovaras G, Liakou P, Baloyiannis I, Spyridakis M, Mantzos F, Tepetes K, Athanassiou E, Hatzitheofilou C (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy: differences between male and female patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Surg 31:409–413PubMedCrossRef Tzovaras G, Liakou P, Baloyiannis I, Spyridakis M, Mantzos F, Tepetes K, Athanassiou E, Hatzitheofilou C (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy: differences between male and female patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Surg 31:409–413PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 24:266–269PubMedCrossRef Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 24:266–269PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat McBurney C (1894) The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38–43PubMedCrossRef McBurney C (1894) The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38–43PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer CP, Castaneda A, Moore F (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: indications and controversies. Semin Laparosc Surg 9:32–39PubMedCrossRef Fischer CP, Castaneda A, Moore F (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: indications and controversies. Semin Laparosc Surg 9:32–39PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroder DM, Lathrop JC, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Hawasli A (1993) Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is there really any benefit? Am Surg 59:541–548PubMed Schroder DM, Lathrop JC, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Hawasli A (1993) Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is there really any benefit? Am Surg 59:541–548PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42:377–383PubMed Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42:377–383PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Meynaud-Kraemer L, Colin C, Vergnon P et al (1999) Wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15:380–391PubMed Meynaud-Kraemer L, Colin C, Vergnon P et al (1999) Wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15:380–391PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:17–26PubMedCrossRef Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:17–26PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256PubMedCrossRef Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Slim K, Chipponi J (2006) Laparoscopy for every acute appendicitis? Surg Endosc 20:1785–1786PubMedCrossRef Slim K, Chipponi J (2006) Laparoscopy for every acute appendicitis? Surg Endosc 20:1785–1786PubMedCrossRef
40.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD001546 Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD001546
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–213PubMedCrossRef Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–213PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Azaro EM, Amaral PC, Ettinger JE, Souza EL, Fortes MF, Alcântara RS, Regis AB, Sousa MM, Fogagnoli WG, do Carmo VM, Galvão TD, Stagliorio EP, Santana PA Jr, Fahel E (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study. JSLS 3:279–283PubMed Azaro EM, Amaral PC, Ettinger JE, Souza EL, Fortes MF, Alcântara RS, Regis AB, Sousa MM, Fogagnoli WG, do Carmo VM, Galvão TD, Stagliorio EP, Santana PA Jr, Fahel E (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study. JSLS 3:279–283PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112:497–501PubMed Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112:497–501PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:289–295PubMedCrossRef Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:289–295PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis
verfasst von
Bo Wei
Cui-Lling Qi
Tu-Feng Chen
Zong-Heng Zheng
Jiang-Long Huang
Bao-Guang Hu
Hong-Bo Wei
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.