Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2012

01.05.2012

Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center

verfasst von: Adrian M. Fox, Kristen Pitzul, Faizal Bhojani, Max Kaplan, Carol-Anne Moulton, Alice C. Wei, Ian McGilvray, Sean Cleary, Allan Okrainec

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The cost implications of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and a detailed breakdown of hospital expenditures has not been presented in the literature to date. This study aimed to compare hospital costs and short-term clinical outcomes between LDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).

Methods

The authors evaluated all the distal pancreatic resections performed at their center between January 2004 and March 2010. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analysis was used to compare hospital departmental and total hospital costs as well as oncologic and surgical outcomes.

Results

A total of 118 cases (42 laparoscopic resections, including 5 conversions, and 76 open resections) were analyzed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups except for a predominance of females in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.036). The indications for surgery differed by a paucity of malignant tumors being approached laparoscopically (P < 0.001). Intraoperatively, there were no differences in estimated blood loss, operating room time, or transfusion requirement. The pathologic outcomes did not differ significantly. The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 5 days (range 3–31 days) for the LDP cohort and 7 days (range 4–19 days) for the ODP cohort (P < 0.001). Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred for 22 patients, with a higher proportion observed in the LDP group (28.57%; n = 12) than in the open group (13.16%; n = 10; P = 0.05). However, the rates for grade B and higher grade fistula were higher in the ODP group (0 LDP and 4 ODP). The median preadmission and operative costs did not differ significantly. The ODP cohort had significantly higher costs in all other hospital departments, including the total cost.

Conclusion

LDP is both a cost-effective and safe approach for distal pancreatic lesions. This series showed a shorter LOS and lower total hospital costs for LDP than for ODP, accompanied by equivalent postoperative outcomes.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brokelman WJ, Lensvelt M, Borel Rinkes IH, Klinkenbijl JH, Reijnen MM (2011) Peritoneal changes due to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:1–9PubMedCrossRef Brokelman WJ, Lensvelt M, Borel Rinkes IH, Klinkenbijl JH, Reijnen MM (2011) Peritoneal changes due to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:1–9PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW, Sellers JB, Merchant NB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC III, Kim HJ, Ahmad S, Cho CS, Parikh AA, Chu CK, Hamilton NA, Doyle CJ, Pinchot S, Hayman A, McClaine R, Nakeeb A, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lillemoe KD (2010) A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210(779–785):86–87 Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW, Sellers JB, Merchant NB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC III, Kim HJ, Ahmad S, Cho CS, Parikh AA, Chu CK, Hamilton NA, Doyle CJ, Pinchot S, Hayman A, McClaine R, Nakeeb A, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lillemoe KD (2010) A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210(779–785):86–87
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Nagorney DM, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Kendrick ML (2010) Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. Arch Surg 145:616–621PubMedCrossRef Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Nagorney DM, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Kendrick ML (2010) Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. Arch Surg 145:616–621PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalziel K, Segal L, Mortimer D (2008) Review of Australian health economic evaluation—245 interventions: what can we say about cost effectiveness? Cost Eff Resour Alloc 6:9PubMedCrossRef Dalziel K, Segal L, Mortimer D (2008) Review of Australian health economic evaluation—245 interventions: what can we say about cost effectiveness? Cost Eff Resour Alloc 6:9PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas M, Hall J (1998) The economic evaluation of health care. Health Inf Manag 28:169–172PubMed Haas M, Hall J (1998) The economic evaluation of health care. Health Inf Manag 28:169–172PubMed
7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Benzaquen BS, Eisenberg MJ, Challapalli R, Nguyen T, Brown KJ, Topol EJ (1998) Correlates of in-hospital cost among patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Am Heart J 136(4 Pt 1):696–702PubMedCrossRef Benzaquen BS, Eisenberg MJ, Challapalli R, Nguyen T, Brown KJ, Topol EJ (1998) Correlates of in-hospital cost among patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Am Heart J 136(4 Pt 1):696–702PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wordsworth S, Ludbrook A, Caskey F, Macleod A (2005) Collecting unit cost data in multicentre studies: creating comparable methods. Eur J Health Econ 6:38–44PubMedCrossRef Wordsworth S, Ludbrook A, Caskey F, Macleod A (2005) Collecting unit cost data in multicentre studies: creating comparable methods. Eur J Health Econ 6:38–44PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Kooby DA (2009) Should all distal pancreatectomies be performed laparoscopically? Adv Surg 43:283–300PubMedCrossRef Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Kooby DA (2009) Should all distal pancreatectomies be performed laparoscopically? Adv Surg 43:283–300PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Park S, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y (2007) Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: cost comparison with analysis of individual parameters. J Endourol 21:1449–1454PubMedCrossRef Park S, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y (2007) Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: cost comparison with analysis of individual parameters. J Endourol 21:1449–1454PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho CS, Kooby DA, Schmidt CM, Nakeeb A, Bentrem DJ, Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Martin RC II, Scoggins CR, Ahmad SA, Kim HJ, Hamilton N, Hawkins WG, Weber SM (2011) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 253(5):975–980. Erratum in: Ann Surg 254(2):391 Cho CS, Kooby DA, Schmidt CM, Nakeeb A, Bentrem DJ, Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Martin RC II, Scoggins CR, Ahmad SA, Kim HJ, Hamilton N, Hawkins WG, Weber SM (2011) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 253(5):975–980. Erratum in: Ann Surg 254(2):391
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, Smith A, Jarnagin W, Coit DG, Merchant N, Brennan MF (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234:487–493 discussion 93–94PubMedCrossRef Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, Smith A, Jarnagin W, Coit DG, Merchant N, Brennan MF (2001) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234:487–493 discussion 93–94PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Eom BW, Jang JY, Lee SE, Han HS, Yoon YS, Kim SW (2008) Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1334–1338PubMedCrossRef Eom BW, Jang JY, Lee SE, Han HS, Yoon YS, Kim SW (2008) Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1334–1338PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268PubMedCrossRef Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148:814–823PubMedCrossRef Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148:814–823PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sain AH (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current “gold standard” for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg 224:689–690PubMedCrossRef Sain AH (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current “gold standard” for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg 224:689–690PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234:279–289 discussion 89–91PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234:279–289 discussion 89–91PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraman S, Gonen M, Brennan MF, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ (2010) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution. J Am Coll Surg 211:503–509PubMedCrossRef Jayaraman S, Gonen M, Brennan MF, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ (2010) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution. J Am Coll Surg 211:503–509PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nigri GR, Rosman AS, Petrucciani N, Fancellu A, Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Ramacciato G, Melis M (2010) Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surg Endosc 25(5):1642–1651PubMedCrossRef Nigri GR, Rosman AS, Petrucciani N, Fancellu A, Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Ramacciato G, Melis M (2010) Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surg Endosc 25(5):1642–1651PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonnenday CJ, Birkmeyer JD (2010) A tale of two provinces: regionalization of pancreatic surgery in Ontario and Quebec. Ann Surg Oncol 17(10):2535–2536PubMedCrossRef Sonnenday CJ, Birkmeyer JD (2010) A tale of two provinces: regionalization of pancreatic surgery in Ontario and Quebec. Ann Surg Oncol 17(10):2535–2536PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, Sutradhar R, Baxter N, To T, Brown A, Davis D, Levine MN (2010) Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian provinces. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2537–2544PubMedCrossRef Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, Sutradhar R, Baxter N, To T, Brown A, Davis D, Levine MN (2010) Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian provinces. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2537–2544PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center
verfasst von
Adrian M. Fox
Kristen Pitzul
Faizal Bhojani
Max Kaplan
Carol-Anne Moulton
Alice C. Wei
Ian McGilvray
Sean Cleary
Allan Okrainec
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2061-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.