Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2012

01.12.2012

Is laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease beneficial in patients with previous primary resection through midline laparotomy? A case-matched study

verfasst von: Erman Aytac, Luca Stocchi, Feza H. Remzi, Ravi P. Kiran

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery for Crohn’s disease are predisposed to recurrence requiring reoperation. The effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open resection in patients with previous intestinal resection for Crohn’s through midline laparotomy is controversial.

Methods

Patients with previous open resection for intestinal Crohn’s disease undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery for recurrent bowel disease from 1997 to 2011 were case-matched with open counterparts based on age (±5 years), gender, body mass index (±2 kg/m2), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical procedure, and year of surgery (±3 years). Groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for quantitative data.

Results

26 patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocolectomy (n = 14), proctocolectomy (n = 5), small bowel resection (n = 4), abdominoperineal resection (n = 1), extended right colectomy (n = 1), and strictureplasty (n = 1) were well matched to 26 patients undergoing open surgery. The number of previous operations, disease phenotypes, steroid use, and comorbidities were comparable in the two groups. There were no deaths, and three patients (12 %) required conversion because of adhesions. Laparoscopic and open groups had statistically similar operating times (169 versus 158 min, p = 0.94), estimated blood loss (222 versus 427 ml, p = 0.32), overall morbidity (39 versus 69 %, p = 0.051), reoperation rates (8 versus 0 %, p = 0.5), postoperative return of bowel function (3.5 ± 1.4 versus 3.9 ± 1.7 days, p = 0.3), mean length of hospital stay (6.4 ± 6.2 versus 6.9 ± 3.5 days, p = 0.12), and readmission rates (8 versus 12 %, p = 0.64). Wound infection rate was decreased after laparoscopic surgery (0 versus 27 %, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease in patients with previous primary resection through laparotomy can be frequently and safely completed laparoscopically. Wound infection rates are reduced, but the recovery advantages of a minimally invasive approach are not maintained when compared with open surgery. The decision to operate laparoscopically should therefore be carefully calibrated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:605–610PubMedCrossRef Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:605–610PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bandyopadhyay D, Sagar PM, Mirnezami A, Lengyel J, Morrison C, Gatt M (2011) Laparoscopic resection for recurrent Crohn’s disease: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes. Colorectal Dis 13:161–165PubMedCrossRef Bandyopadhyay D, Sagar PM, Mirnezami A, Lengyel J, Morrison C, Gatt M (2011) Laparoscopic resection for recurrent Crohn’s disease: safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes. Colorectal Dis 13:161–165PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stocchi L, Milsom JW, Fazio VW (2008) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 144:622–628PubMedCrossRef Stocchi L, Milsom JW, Fazio VW (2008) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 144:622–628PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Pierik EG, Gouma DJ, Hommes DW, Sprangers MA, Bemelman WA (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 243:143–153PubMedCrossRef Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Pierik EG, Gouma DJ, Hommes DW, Sprangers MA, Bemelman WA (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 243:143–153PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowney JK, Dietz DW, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Mutch MG, Fleshman JW (2006) Is there any difference in recurrence rates in laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease compared with conventional surgery? A long-term, follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:58–63PubMedCrossRef Lowney JK, Dietz DW, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Mutch MG, Fleshman JW (2006) Is there any difference in recurrence rates in laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease compared with conventional surgery? A long-term, follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:58–63PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Penner RM, Madsen KL, Fedorak RN (2005) Postoperative Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:765–777PubMedCrossRef Penner RM, Madsen KL, Fedorak RN (2005) Postoperative Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:765–777PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G (2000) Risk factors for surgery and recurrence in 907 patients with primary ileocaecal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 87:1697–1701PubMedCrossRef Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G (2000) Risk factors for surgery and recurrence in 907 patients with primary ileocaecal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 87:1697–1701PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Ishii Y, Hibi T, Kitajima M (2007) Indications for laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease using the Vienna Classification. Colorectal Dis 9:825–829PubMedCrossRef Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Ishii Y, Hibi T, Kitajima M (2007) Indications for laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease using the Vienna Classification. Colorectal Dis 9:825–829PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Moscovitz ID (2000) Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s disease. Surg Clin North Am 80:1299–1319PubMedCrossRef Wexner SD, Moscovitz ID (2000) Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s disease. Surg Clin North Am 80:1299–1319PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinto RA, Shawki S, Narita K, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2011) Laparoscopy for recurrent Crohn’s disease: how do the results compare with the results for primary Crohn’s disease? Colorectal Dis 13:302–307PubMedCrossRef Pinto RA, Shawki S, Narita K, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2011) Laparoscopy for recurrent Crohn’s disease: how do the results compare with the results for primary Crohn’s disease? Colorectal Dis 13:302–307PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaudhary B, Glancy D, Dixon AR (2011) Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn’s disease is as safe and effective as primary resection. Colorectal Dis 13:1413–1416PubMedCrossRef Chaudhary B, Glancy D, Dixon AR (2011) Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn’s disease is as safe and effective as primary resection. Colorectal Dis 13:1413–1416PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lesperance K, Martin MJ, Lehmann R, Brounts L, Steele SR (2009) National trends and outcomes for the surgical therapy of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease: a population-based analysis of laparoscopic vs. open approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1251–1259PubMedCrossRef Lesperance K, Martin MJ, Lehmann R, Brounts L, Steele SR (2009) National trends and outcomes for the surgical therapy of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease: a population-based analysis of laparoscopic vs. open approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1251–1259PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Lee YM, Chu KW (2005) Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 19:326–330PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Lee YM, Chu KW (2005) Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 19:326–330PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vignali A, Di Palo S, De Nardi P, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2007) Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study. Tech Coloproctol 11:241–246PubMedCrossRef Vignali A, Di Palo S, De Nardi P, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2007) Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study. Tech Coloproctol 11:241–246PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschierl A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschierl A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Franko J, O’Connell BG, Mehall JR, Harper SG, Nejman JH, Zebley DM, Fassler SA (2006) The influence of prior abdominal operations on conversion and complication rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 10:169–175PubMed Franko J, O’Connell BG, Mehall JR, Harper SG, Nejman JH, Zebley DM, Fassler SA (2006) The influence of prior abdominal operations on conversion and complication rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 10:169–175PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Okabayashi K, Hibi T, Kitajima M (2003) Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 90:970–973PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Okabayashi K, Hibi T, Kitajima M (2003) Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 90:970–973PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchikoshi F, Ito T, Nezu R, Tanemura M, Kai Y, Mizushima T, Nakajima K, Tamagawa H, Matsuda C, Matsuda H (2004) Advantages of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 18:1675–1679PubMed Uchikoshi F, Ito T, Nezu R, Tanemura M, Kai Y, Mizushima T, Nakajima K, Tamagawa H, Matsuda C, Matsuda H (2004) Advantages of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 18:1675–1679PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Privitera A, Cima RR, Pemberton JH, Young-Fadok T, Larson DW (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16:1382–1386PubMedCrossRef Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Privitera A, Cima RR, Pemberton JH, Young-Fadok T, Larson DW (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16:1382–1386PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouquet A, Blanc B, Bretagnol F, Valleur P, Bouhnik Y, Panis Y (2010) Surgery for intestinal Crohn’s disease recurrence. Surgery 148:936–946PubMedCrossRef Brouquet A, Blanc B, Bretagnol F, Valleur P, Bouhnik Y, Panis Y (2010) Surgery for intestinal Crohn’s disease recurrence. Surgery 148:936–946PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobson MW, Geisler D, Fazio V, Remzi F, Hull T, Vogel J (2011) Minimally invasive surgical wound infections: laparoscopic surgery decreases morbidity of surgical site infections and decreases the cost of wound care. Colorectal Dis 13:811–815PubMedCrossRef Dobson MW, Geisler D, Fazio V, Remzi F, Hull T, Vogel J (2011) Minimally invasive surgical wound infections: laparoscopic surgery decreases morbidity of surgical site infections and decreases the cost of wound care. Colorectal Dis 13:811–815PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ihara A, Onozato W, Sato T, Ozawa H, Hatade K, Watanabe M (2008) Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg 32:1138–1141PubMedCrossRef Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ihara A, Onozato W, Sato T, Ozawa H, Hatade K, Watanabe M (2008) Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg 32:1138–1141PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kronberg U, Kiran RP, Soliman MS, Hammel JP, Galway U, Coffey JC, Fazio VW (2011) A characterization of factors determining postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy enables the generation of a novel predictive score. Ann Surg 253:78–81PubMedCrossRef Kronberg U, Kiran RP, Soliman MS, Hammel JP, Galway U, Coffey JC, Fazio VW (2011) A characterization of factors determining postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy enables the generation of a novel predictive score. Ann Surg 253:78–81PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease beneficial in patients with previous primary resection through midline laparotomy? A case-matched study
verfasst von
Erman Aytac
Luca Stocchi
Feza H. Remzi
Ravi P. Kiran
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2361-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.