Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2013

01.02.2013

Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study

verfasst von: Dirk Rolf Bulian, Linda Trump, Jürgen Knuth, Robert Siegel, Axel Sauerwald, Michael A. Ströhlein, Markus Maria Heiss

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Natural orifice surgery (NOS) is gaining acceptance as an alternative to the traditional laparoscopic technique, especially for cholecystectomy through the transvaginal route. However, NOS remains controversial concerning expected advantages in terms of short- and long-term outcomes and potential side effects. This study was designed to compare short-term outcomes between transvaginal/transumbilical and classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

A prospective matched-cohort study compared the authors’ first 50 transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomies (TVC) with a group of 50 classical LCs from the corresponding period matched in terms of age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiology classification. In both groups, elective surgery was performed for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. In the NOS group, a hybrid procedure was performed with one transumbilical rigid instrument and two transvaginal rigid instruments. A numeric rating scale was used for daily pain assessment, initiated postoperatively in the recovery room. Both groups were compared with regard to length of surgery, intra- and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and consumption of analgesics.

Results

The length of surgery and the rate of complications were similar in the two groups. But significant advantages were found for the transvaginal access in terms of pain using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on the day of surgery (NRS, 1.5/10 vs 3.1/10; p = 0.003) as well as in the morning (NRS, 1.9/10 vs 2.8/10; p = 0.047) and in the evening (NRS, 1.1/10 vs 1.8/10; p = 0.025) of postoperative day 1, and with regard to the length of the postoperative hospital stay (2.7 vs 3.4 days; p = 0.035).

Conclusions

The findings show that TVC is a safe procedure for female patients. It has a risk comparable with that of classic LC, causes significantly less pain in the early postoperative period, and leads to a significantly shorter hospital stay. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to confirm these results.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39:913–915PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39:913–915PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A et al (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270PubMedCrossRef Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A et al (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: an overview of Cochrane hepato-biliary group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD008318 Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: an overview of Cochrane hepato-biliary group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD008318
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003145 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003145
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters MJ, Mukhtar A, Yunus RM et al (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1548–1561 quiz 7, 62PubMedCrossRef Peters MJ, Mukhtar A, Yunus RM et al (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1548–1561 quiz 7, 62PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman MS, DeCesare S, Kalter C (1994) Abdominal hysterectomy versus transvaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:309–313 discussion 13–15PubMed Hoffman MS, DeCesare S, Kalter C (1994) Abdominal hysterectomy versus transvaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:309–313 discussion 13–15PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Teng FY, Muzsnai D, Perez R, Mazdisnian F, Ross A, Sayre JW (1996) A comparative study of laparoscopy and colpotomy for the removal of ovarian dermoid cysts. Obstet Gynecol 87:1009–1013PubMedCrossRef Teng FY, Muzsnai D, Perez R, Mazdisnian F, Ross A, Sayre JW (1996) A comparative study of laparoscopy and colpotomy for the removal of ovarian dermoid cysts. Obstet Gynecol 87:1009–1013PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Childers JM, Huang D, Surwit EA (1993) Laparoscopic trocar-assisted colpotomy. Obstet Gynecol 81:153–155PubMed Childers JM, Huang D, Surwit EA (1993) Laparoscopic trocar-assisted colpotomy. Obstet Gynecol 81:153–155PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Delvaux G, Devroey P, De Waele B, Willems G (1993) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:307–309PubMed Delvaux G, Devroey P, De Waele B, Willems G (1993) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:307–309PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghezzi F, Raio L, Mueller MD, Gyr T, Buttarelli M, Franchi M (2002) Vaginal extraction of pelvic masses following operative laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16:1691–1696PubMedCrossRef Ghezzi F, Raio L, Mueller MD, Gyr T, Buttarelli M, Franchi M (2002) Vaginal extraction of pelvic masses following operative laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16:1691–1696PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmermann A, Zornig C, Peiper M, Weh HJ, Broelsch CE (1995) Laparoscopic splenectomy: technique and results in a series of 27 cases. Surg Endosc 9:924–927PubMed Emmermann A, Zornig C, Peiper M, Weh HJ, Broelsch CE (1995) Laparoscopic splenectomy: technique and results in a series of 27 cases. Surg Endosc 9:924–927PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826 discussion 6–7PubMedCrossRef Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826 discussion 6–7PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, Parikh M, Fowler D (2007) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1243–1245PubMedCrossRef Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, Parikh M, Fowler D (2007) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1243–1245PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolz C, Noguera JF, Martin A, Vilella A, Cuadrado A (2007) Transvaginal cholecystectomy (NOTES) combined with minilaparoscopy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 99:698–702PubMedCrossRef Dolz C, Noguera JF, Martin A, Vilella A, Cuadrado A (2007) Transvaginal cholecystectomy (NOTES) combined with minilaparoscopy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 99:698–702PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2011) Surgical outcome and midterm follow-up after transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 21:101–106CrossRef Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2011) Surgical outcome and midterm follow-up after transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 21:101–106CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos AC, Murakami A, Galvao Neto M et al (2008) NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series. Endoscopy 40:572–575PubMedCrossRef Ramos AC, Murakami A, Galvao Neto M et al (2008) NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series. Endoscopy 40:572–575PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L et al (2009) Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with midterm follow-up. Endoscopy 41:391–394PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L et al (2009) Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with midterm follow-up. Endoscopy 41:391–394PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V et al (2010) Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 24:2444–2452PubMedCrossRef Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V et al (2010) Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 24:2444–2452PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Linke GR, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R et al (2010) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice. Endoscopy 42:571–575PubMedCrossRef Linke GR, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R et al (2010) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice. Endoscopy 42:571–575PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C et al (2009) Non-randomised, comparative, prospective study of transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy versus transparietal laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cir Esp 85:287–291PubMedCrossRef Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C et al (2009) Non-randomised, comparative, prospective study of transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy versus transparietal laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cir Esp 85:287–291PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2012) Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective case-control study. Zentralbl Chir 137:48–54PubMedCrossRef Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2012) Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective case-control study. Zentralbl Chir 137:48–54PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilian M, Raue W, Menenakos C, Wassersleben B, Hartmann J (2011) Transvaginal-hybrid vs single-port access vs “conventional” laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:709–715PubMedCrossRef Kilian M, Raue W, Menenakos C, Wassersleben B, Hartmann J (2011) Transvaginal-hybrid vs single-port access vs “conventional” laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:709–715PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki K, Yasuda K, Kawaguchi K et al (2010) Cardiopulmonary and immunologic effects of transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a porcine survival model. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1241–1248PubMedCrossRef Suzuki K, Yasuda K, Kawaguchi K et al (2010) Cardiopulmonary and immunologic effects of transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a porcine survival model. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1241–1248PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study
verfasst von
Dirk Rolf Bulian
Linda Trump
Jürgen Knuth
Robert Siegel
Axel Sauerwald
Michael A. Ströhlein
Markus Maria Heiss
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2490-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.