Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2013

01.05.2013

Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis

verfasst von: Karen Chang, Mathew Fakhoury, Moshe Barnajian, Cristi Tarta, Roberto Bergamaschi

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This study was performed to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis following resection of the right colon.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of selected patients who underwent laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis following resection of the right colon for tumors or Crohn’s disease by a single surgeon from July 2002 through June 2012. Data were retrieved from an Institutional Review Board-approved database. Study end point was postoperative adverse events, including mortality, complications, reoperations, and readmissions at 30 days. Antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomoses were fashioned laparoscopically with a 60-mm-long stapler cartridge and enterocolotomy was hand-sewn intracorporeally in two layers. Values were expressed as medians (ranges) for continuous variables.

Results

There were 243 patients (143 females) aged 61 (range = 19–96) years, with body mass index of 29 (18–43) kg/m2 and ASA 1:2:3:4 of 52:110:77:4; 30 % had previous abdominal surgery and 38 % had a preexisting comorbidity. There were 84 ileocolic resections with ileo ascending anastomosis and 159 right colectomies with ileotransverse anastomosis. Operating time was 135 (60–220) min. Estimated blood loss was 50 (10–600) ml. Specimen extraction site incision length was 4.1 (3–4.4) cm. Conversion rate was 3 % and there was no mortality at 30 days, 15 complications (6.2 %), and 8 reoperations (3.3 %). Readmission rate was 8.7 %. Length of stay was 4 (2–32) days. Pathology confirmed Crohn’s disease in 84 patients, adenocarcinoma in 152, and other tumors in 7 patients.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis following resection of the right colon resulted in a favorable outcome in selected patients with Crohn’s disease or tumors of the right colon.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlinkert RT (1991) Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34:1030–1031PubMedCrossRef Schlinkert RT (1991) Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34:1030–1031PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H (2000) Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 43:267–271 discussion 271–273PubMedCrossRef Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H (2000) Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 43:267–271 discussion 271–273PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore A, Delaney C, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679CrossRef Senagore A, Delaney C, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ou H (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted mini laparotomy with colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:324–326PubMedCrossRef Ou H (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted mini laparotomy with colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:324–326PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Casciola L, Ceccarelli G, Di Zitti L (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58:621–627PubMed Casciola L, Ceccarelli G, Di Zitti L (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58:621–627PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(9):004320 Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(9):004320
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumberg D (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy performed using a completely intracorporeal technique is associated with similar outcomes in obese and thin patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:57–61PubMedCrossRef Blumberg D (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy performed using a completely intracorporeal technique is associated with similar outcomes in obese and thin patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:57–61PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317PubMed Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891PubMedCrossRef Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Scatizzi M, Kroning K, Borrelli A, Andan G, Lenzi E, Ferroci F (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908PubMedCrossRef Scatizzi M, Kroning K, Borrelli A, Andan G, Lenzi E, Ferroci F (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaves JA, Idoate CP, Fons JB, Oliver NB, Rodriguez NP, Delgado AB, Lizoain JLH (2011) A case control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Cir Esp 89:24–30PubMedCrossRef Chaves JA, Idoate CP, Fons JB, Oliver NB, Rodriguez NP, Delgado AB, Lizoain JLH (2011) A case control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Cir Esp 89:24–30PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabozzi M, Allieta R, Contul RB, Grivin M, Millo P, Lale-Murix E, Nardi M Jr (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 24:2085–2091PubMedCrossRef Fabozzi M, Allieta R, Contul RB, Grivin M, Millo P, Lale-Murix E, Nardi M Jr (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 24:2085–2091PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabot JC, Lee SA, Yoo J, Nasar A, Whelan RL, Feingold DL (2010) Long-term consequences of not closing the mesenteric defect after laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:289–292PubMedCrossRef Cabot JC, Lee SA, Yoo J, Nasar A, Whelan RL, Feingold DL (2010) Long-term consequences of not closing the mesenteric defect after laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:289–292PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Causey MW, Oguntoye M, Steele SR (2011) Incidence of complications following colectomy with mesenteric closure versus no mesenteric closure: does it really matter? J Surg Res 171:571–575PubMedCrossRef Causey MW, Oguntoye M, Steele SR (2011) Incidence of complications following colectomy with mesenteric closure versus no mesenteric closure: does it really matter? J Surg Res 171:571–575PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600PubMedCrossRef Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis
verfasst von
Karen Chang
Mathew Fakhoury
Moshe Barnajian
Cristi Tarta
Roberto Bergamaschi
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2665-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.