Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2013

01.06.2013

Optimizing working-space in laparoscopy: measuring the effect of mechanical bowel preparation in a porcine model

verfasst von: John Vlot, Juliette C. Slieker, René Wijnen, Johan F. Lange, Klaas(N) M. A. Bax

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Adequate working space is a prerequisite for safe and efficient minimal access surgery. No objective data exist in literature about the effect of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on working space in laparoscopic surgery. We objectively measured this effect with computed tomography in a porcine laparoscopy model.

Methods

Using standardized anesthesia, twelve 20-kg pigs without MBP and eight 20-kg pigs with MBP were studied with computed tomography at intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) levels of 0, 5, 10, and 15 mmHg. Volumes and dimensions of the pneumoperitoneum were measured on reconstructed CT images and compared between the pigs with and those without MBP.

Results

A reproducible and statistically significant increase of approximately 500 ml in pneumoperitoneum volume was found in the MBP group at all levels of IAP. This represents a 43 % relative increase at a pneumoperitoneum pressure of 5 mmHg, 21 % at IAP 10 mmHg, and 18 % at IAP 15 mmHg. Peak inspiratory pressure was lower at IAP 0 and 5 mmHg in the MBP group. Anteroposterior diameter in the group with MBP was lower at 0 mmHg, but abdominal dimensions were similar in both groups at all other IAPs. This shows that the gain in working space is due to a diminished volume of the intra-abdominal content and not to compression or displacement of the bowel.

Conclusions

MBP increases working space by reducing bowel content. Especially at low intra-abdominal working pressures, the increase in working space associated with MBP could represent an important benefit in challenging laparoscopic surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson H, Sargent DJ, COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Nelson H, Sargent DJ, COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD005200 Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD005200
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reza MM et al (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93(8):921–928CrossRefPubMed Reza MM et al (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93(8):921–928CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta CM et al (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):217–222CrossRefPubMed Schlachta CM et al (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):217–222CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blobner M et al (1998) Effects of intra-abdominally insufflated carbon dioxide and elevated intraabdominal pressure on splanchnic circulation: an experimental study in pigs. Anesthesiology 89(2):475–482CrossRefPubMed Blobner M et al (1998) Effects of intra-abdominally insufflated carbon dioxide and elevated intraabdominal pressure on splanchnic circulation: an experimental study in pigs. Anesthesiology 89(2):475–482CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgos FJ et al (2009) Changes in visceral flow induced by laparoscopic and open living-donor nephrectomy: experimental model. Transplant Proc 41(6):2491–2492CrossRefPubMed Burgos FJ et al (2009) Changes in visceral flow induced by laparoscopic and open living-donor nephrectomy: experimental model. Transplant Proc 41(6):2491–2492CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Caldwell CB, Ricotta JJ (1987) Changes in visceral blood flow with elevated intraabdominal pressure. J Surg Res 43(1):14–20CrossRefPubMed Caldwell CB, Ricotta JJ (1987) Changes in visceral blood flow with elevated intraabdominal pressure. J Surg Res 43(1):14–20CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta A, Watson DI (2001) Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg 88(10):1296–1306CrossRefPubMed Gupta A, Watson DI (2001) Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg 88(10):1296–1306CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirvonen EA et al (2000) The adverse hemodynamic effects of anesthesia, head-up tilt, and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14(3):272–277CrossRefPubMed Hirvonen EA et al (2000) The adverse hemodynamic effects of anesthesia, head-up tilt, and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14(3):272–277CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakimowicz J, Stultiens G, Smulders F (1998) Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc 12(2):129–132CrossRefPubMed Jakimowicz J, Stultiens G, Smulders F (1998) Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc 12(2):129–132CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L (1999) Respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 89(3):800PubMed Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L (1999) Respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 89(3):800PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Neudecker J et al (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(7):1121–1143CrossRefPubMed Neudecker J et al (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(7):1121–1143CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sammour T et al (2009) Systematic review of oxidative stress associated with pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 96(8):836–850CrossRefPubMed Sammour T et al (2009) Systematic review of oxidative stress associated with pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 96(8):836–850CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schilling MK et al (1997) Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 184(4):378–382PubMed Schilling MK et al (1997) Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 184(4):378–382PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasir M et al (2012) Evaluation of post operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeon 10(2):71–74CrossRefPubMed Yasir M et al (2012) Evaluation of post operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeon 10(2):71–74CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Reintam Blaser A, Bloechlinger S (2010) Should we be worried about disturbed sympathovagal balance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Minerva Anestesiol 76(11):876–878PubMed Reintam Blaser A, Bloechlinger S (2010) Should we be worried about disturbed sympathovagal balance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Minerva Anestesiol 76(11):876–878PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ure BM et al (2007) Physiological responses to endoscopic surgery in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 16(4):217–223CrossRefPubMed Ure BM et al (2007) Physiological responses to endoscopic surgery in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 16(4):217–223CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Balick-Weber CC et al (2007) Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment. Br J Anaesth 99(3):429–435CrossRefPubMed Balick-Weber CC et al (2007) Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment. Br J Anaesth 99(3):429–435CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chassard D et al (1996) The effects of neuromuscular block on peak airway pressure and abdominal elastance during pneumoperitoneum. Anesth Analg 82(3):525–527PubMed Chassard D et al (1996) The effects of neuromuscular block on peak airway pressure and abdominal elastance during pneumoperitoneum. Anesth Analg 82(3):525–527PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dexter SP et al (1999) Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13(4):376–381CrossRefPubMed Dexter SP et al (1999) Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13(4):376–381CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2008) Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006574 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2008) Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006574
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2009) Low-pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006930 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2009) Low-pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD006930
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong YT et al (2005) Peritoneal pH during laparoscopy is dependent on ambient gas environment: helium and nitrous oxide do not cause peritoneal acidosis. Surg Endosc 19(1):60–64CrossRefPubMed Wong YT et al (2005) Peritoneal pH during laparoscopy is dependent on ambient gas environment: helium and nitrous oxide do not cause peritoneal acidosis. Surg Endosc 19(1):60–64CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Emam TA et al (2000) Effect of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio on endoscopic task performance and surgeon movements. Arch Surg 135(1):62–65 discussion 66CrossRefPubMed Emam TA et al (2000) Effect of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio on endoscopic task performance and surgeon movements. Arch Surg 135(1):62–65 discussion 66CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Frede T et al (1999) Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques. J Endourol 13(3):191–198CrossRefPubMed Frede T et al (1999) Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques. J Endourol 13(3):191–198CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 84(10):1460–1464CrossRefPubMed Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 84(10):1460–1464CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlot J, Wijnen R, Stolker RJ, Bax K (2012) Optimizing working-space in porcine laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effects of intra-abdominal pressure. Surg Endosc Dec 13 [Epub ahead of print] Vlot J, Wijnen R, Stolker RJ, Bax K (2012) Optimizing working-space in porcine laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effects of intra-abdominal pressure. Surg Endosc Dec 13 [Epub ahead of print]
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Muzii L et al (2003) Bowel preparation for gynecological surgery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48(3):311–315CrossRefPubMed Muzii L et al (2003) Bowel preparation for gynecological surgery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48(3):311–315CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang LC et al (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation for gynecologic laparoscopy: a prospective randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate solution vs single sodium phosphate enema. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(2):149–156CrossRefPubMed Yang LC et al (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation for gynecologic laparoscopy: a prospective randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate solution vs single sodium phosphate enema. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(2):149–156CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F et al (2007) Rectal cancer surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 94(10):1266–1271CrossRefPubMed Bretagnol F et al (2007) Rectal cancer surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 94(10):1266–1271CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 92(4):409–414CrossRefPubMed Bucher P et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 92(4):409–414CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Contant CM et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370(9605):2112–2117CrossRefPubMed Contant CM et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370(9605):2112–2117CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Fa-Si-Oen P et al (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(8):1509–1516CrossRefPubMed Fa-Si-Oen P et al (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(8):1509–1516CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Guenaga KK, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P (2009) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001544 Guenaga KK, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P (2009) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001544
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung B et al (2007) Multicentre randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colonic resection. Br J Surg 94(6):689–695CrossRefPubMed Jung B et al (2007) Multicentre randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colonic resection. Br J Surg 94(6):689–695CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Slim K et al (2004) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 91(9):1125–1130CrossRefPubMed Slim K et al (2004) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 91(9):1125–1130CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zmora O et al (2006) Laparoscopic colectomy without mechanical bowel preparation. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(7):683–687CrossRefPubMed Zmora O et al (2006) Laparoscopic colectomy without mechanical bowel preparation. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(7):683–687CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat King JWB, Roberts RC (1960) Carcass length in the bacon pig; its association with vertebrae numbers and prediction from radiographs of the young pig. Animal Prod 2(1):59–65CrossRef King JWB, Roberts RC (1960) Carcass length in the bacon pig; its association with vertebrae numbers and prediction from radiographs of the young pig. Animal Prod 2(1):59–65CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai W et al (2009) MDCT for automated detection and measurement of pneumothoraces in trauma patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(3):830–836CrossRefPubMed Cai W et al (2009) MDCT for automated detection and measurement of pneumothoraces in trauma patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(3):830–836CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Slieker JC et al (2011) Bowel preparation prior to laparoscopic colorectal resection: what is the current practice? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(10):899–903CrossRefPubMed Slieker JC et al (2011) Bowel preparation prior to laparoscopic colorectal resection: what is the current practice? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(10):899–903CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells T, Plante M, McAlpine JN (2011) Preoperative bowel preparation in gynecologic oncology: a review of practice patterns and an impetus to change. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(6):1135–1142CrossRefPubMed Wells T, Plante M, McAlpine JN (2011) Preoperative bowel preparation in gynecologic oncology: a review of practice patterns and an impetus to change. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(6):1135–1142CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara AK et al (2011) National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(5):1076–1082CrossRefPubMed Hara AK et al (2011) National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(5):1076–1082CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu CW, Imperiale TF (1998) Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 48(3):276–282CrossRefPubMed Hsu CW, Imperiale TF (1998) Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 48(3):276–282CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL et al (2004) Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyethylene glycol solution, one dose and two doses of oral sodium phosphate solution. Asian J Surg 27(2):120–124CrossRefPubMed Law WL et al (2004) Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyethylene glycol solution, one dose and two doses of oral sodium phosphate solution. Asian J Surg 27(2):120–124CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Daugherty MA et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of oral low-volume sodium phosphate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 22(1):31–36CrossRefPubMed Daugherty MA et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of oral low-volume sodium phosphate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 22(1):31–36CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer J et al (2006) The Aer-O-Scope: proof of the concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope in a pig model. Endoscopy 38(2):144–148CrossRefPubMed Pfeffer J et al (2006) The Aer-O-Scope: proof of the concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope in a pig model. Endoscopy 38(2):144–148CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Lijoi D et al (2009) Bowel preparation before laparoscopic gynaecological surgery in benign conditions using a 1-week low fibre diet: a surgeon blind, randomized and controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(5):713–718CrossRefPubMed Lijoi D et al (2009) Bowel preparation before laparoscopic gynaecological surgery in benign conditions using a 1-week low fibre diet: a surgeon blind, randomized and controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(5):713–718CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Optimizing working-space in laparoscopy: measuring the effect of mechanical bowel preparation in a porcine model
verfasst von
John Vlot
Juliette C. Slieker
René Wijnen
Johan F. Lange
Klaas(N) M. A. Bax
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2697-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.