Skip to main content
Log in

Critical appraisal of learning curve for single incision laparoscopic right colectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) has emerged as a viable minimally invasive surgical approach with benefits and limitations yet to be fully elucidated. Although shown to be safe and feasible, characterization of the learning curve has not been addressed. Our aim was to identify a learning curve for SILC right hemicolectomy and to determine the incidence of operative failure and complication rates during this phase.

Methods

Over a 2-year period, data from 54 consecutive SILC cases performed by the same surgeon were tabulated in an institutional review board—approved database. A learning curve was generated utilizing cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology to assess changes in total operative time (OT) across the case sequence. A separate learning curve was generated utilizing risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis, taking into account patient risk factors (i.e., age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, prior abdominal surgeries, and tumor size for malignant cases) and operative failure (i.e., prolonged OT, conversion to open surgery, intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, reoperation, readmission, and mortality).

Results

Patients had a mean age of 63.6 ± 11.5 years, mean body mass index of 27.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2, and median American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2. Mean OT and length of stay were 123.5 ± 28.9 min and 3.9 ± 2.4 days, respectively. There were no conversions or oncologic failures. Six patients developed 30-day postoperative complications. CUSUM analysis of OT identified achievement of the learning phase after 30 cases. When taking into account both analyses, the rate of operative failure was not statistically different between the initial 30 and the final 24 cases.

Conclusions

In our experience, the learning curve is achieved between 30 to 36 cases. Offering this minimally invasive surgical approach does not result in increased complications or harmful results even in the early phases of the learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Wu JS, Strong SA, Poloneicki JD, Hull TL, Church JM (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 241:262–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers W, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M, Dixon A (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis 13:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Bartley Pickron T, Haas EM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 24:2613–2616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2010) Single incision laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy technique: application for a mass of the ascending colon (with video). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:e146–e149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J, Patel CB, Miller S, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series. Surg Endosc 26:96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ragupathi M, Nieto J, Haas EM (2012) Pearls and pitfalls in SILS colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:183–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaput de Saintonge DM, Vere DW (1974) Why don’t doctors use CUSUMs? Lancet 1(7848):120–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wohl H (1977) The CUSUM plot: its utility in the analysis of clinical data. N Engl J Med 296:1044–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Eric M. Haas, Javier Nieto, Madhu Ragupathi, Ali Aminian, and Chirag Patel have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric M. Haas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haas, E.M., Nieto, J., Ragupathi, M. et al. Critical appraisal of learning curve for single incision laparoscopic right colectomy. Surg Endosc 27, 4499–4503 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3096-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3096-z

Keywords

Navigation