Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014

01.03.2014 | Editorial

Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)?

verfasst von: Jeffrey W. Hazey, Jeffrey M. Marks, John D. Mellinger, Thadeus L. Trus, Bipan Chand, Conor P. Delaney, Brian J. Dunkin, Robert D. Fanelli, Gerald M. Fried, Jose M. Martinez, Jonathan P. Pearl, Benjamin K. Poulose, Lelan F. Sillin, Melina C. Vassiliou, W. Scott Melvin

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

As flexible endoscopy has moved into the mainstream, gastroenterologists have embraced many of the skills and techniques particular to this modality of diagnosis and intervention. Their adoption of flexible endoscopic technology and training, and the lack of enthusiasm for endoscopic therapy potentials by surgeons, has left many surgical residents and practicing surgeons deficient in endoscopic skills. As a result, education of surgical residents in flexible endoscopy has lagged and training of surgical residents in flexible endoscopy is increasingly coming under scrutiny and has become an area of debate. The medical literature and practice guidelines are replete with articles from surgeons and gastroenterologists debating the appropriate education and training in flexible endoscopy. Both surgical and gastroenterology professional societies have published guidelines for training in flexible endoscopy. These guidelines are often at odds with each other, citing opposing literature supporting their position on appropriate criteria for training in basic upper and lower endoscopy [14]. Flexible endoscopy is a critical element of any general surgeon’s and colorectal surgeon’s practice. In 2007, 74 % of rural surgeons performed more than 50 flexible endoscopic procedures each year, with 42 % of rural surgeons performing more than 200 flexible endoscopic procedures annually [5]. In a 2010 report on rural, under-served areas that lack gastroenterology services, 39.8 % of an American general surgeons’ practice comprises flexible endoscopic procedures [6]. In Canada, surgeons were found to be the primary providers of flexible endoscopic services in smaller urban and rural areas [7]. …
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat SAGES Guidelines Committee (2008) Granting of privilege for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 22:1349–1352CrossRef SAGES Guidelines Committee (2008) Granting of privilege for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 22:1349–1352CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA et al (2002) Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:780–783PubMedCrossRef Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA et al (2002) Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:780–783PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Litwin D, Cohen J et al (2002) Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:145–148PubMedCrossRef Wexner SD, Litwin D, Cohen J et al (2002) Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:145–148PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuckerman R, Doty B, Bark K et al (2007) Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey. Am Surg 73(9):903–905PubMed Zuckerman R, Doty B, Bark K et al (2007) Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey. Am Surg 73(9):903–905PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris JD, Hosford CC, Sticca RP (2010) A comprehensive analysis of surgical procedures in rural surgery practices. Am J Surg 200(6):820–825PubMedCrossRef Harris JD, Hosford CC, Sticca RP (2010) A comprehensive analysis of surgical procedures in rural surgery practices. Am J Surg 200(6):820–825PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilsden RJ, Tepper J, Moayyedi P et al (2007) Who provides gastrointestinal endoscopy in Canada? Can J Gastroenterol 21(12):843–846PubMedCentralPubMed Hilsden RJ, Tepper J, Moayyedi P et al (2007) Who provides gastrointestinal endoscopy in Canada? Can J Gastroenterol 21(12):843–846PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed WP, Kilkenny JW, Dias CE et al (2004) A prospective analysis of 3525 esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed by surgeons. Surg Endosc 18:11–21PubMedCrossRef Reed WP, Kilkenny JW, Dias CE et al (2004) A prospective analysis of 3525 esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed by surgeons. Surg Endosc 18:11–21PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group (2001) A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15:251–261PubMedCrossRef Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group (2001) A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15:251–261PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS et al (2011) Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 140:65–72PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS et al (2011) Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 140:65–72PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehran A, Jaffe P, Efron J et al (2003) Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded? Surg Endosc 17:1971–1973PubMedCrossRef Mehran A, Jaffe P, Efron J et al (2003) Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded? Surg Endosc 17:1971–1973PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC et al (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room—a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120PubMedCrossRef Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC et al (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room—a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelman DA, Mattos MA, Bouwman DL (2011) Impact of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training during medical school on performance by first year surgical residents. J Surg Res 170:6–9PubMedCrossRef Edelman DA, Mattos MA, Bouwman DL (2011) Impact of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training during medical school on performance by first year surgical residents. J Surg Res 170:6–9PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolozsvari NO, Kaneva P, Vassiliou MC et al (2012) New dog, new tricks: trends in performance on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator for incoming surgery residents. Surg Endosc 26:68–71PubMedCrossRef Kolozsvari NO, Kaneva P, Vassiliou MC et al (2012) New dog, new tricks: trends in performance on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator for incoming surgery residents. Surg Endosc 26:68–71PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL et al (2011) Trends and results of the first 5 years of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc 25:1192–1198PubMedCrossRef Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL et al (2011) Trends and results of the first 5 years of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc 25:1192–1198PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Derevainko AY, Schwaitzberg SD, Tsuda S et al (2010) Malpractice carrier underwrites fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. Surg Endosc 24:616–623CrossRef Derevainko AY, Schwaitzberg SD, Tsuda S et al (2010) Malpractice carrier underwrites fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. Surg Endosc 24:616–623CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)?
verfasst von
Jeffrey W. Hazey
Jeffrey M. Marks
John D. Mellinger
Thadeus L. Trus
Bipan Chand
Conor P. Delaney
Brian J. Dunkin
Robert D. Fanelli
Gerald M. Fried
Jose M. Martinez
Jonathan P. Pearl
Benjamin K. Poulose
Lelan F. Sillin
Melina C. Vassiliou
W. Scott Melvin
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3299-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.