Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014

01.05.2014 | Review

Review of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery

verfasst von: Fred Brody, Nathan G. Richards

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In 2000, the robotic platform was introduced to surgeons to take advantage of the instrument’s three-dimensional visualization and articulating wrists. Today, robotic surgery is utilized across a broad array of applications. As the number and types of robotic procedures have increased, the degree of scrutiny has increased simultaneously regarding the role of robotics in the operating room. Even mainstream media articles have focused on the widespread adoption of the robotic platform. At the present time, many reports in the scientific literature document clinical outcomes utilizing robotic techniques relative to open procedures. These reports focus predominantly on the safety and feasibility of the robotic platform. However, only a limited number of reports have compared clinical outcomes of surgeries performed with robotic technologies versus conventional laparoscopy. This review provides a summary of the recent literature comparing the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery across an array of abdominal surgical procedures. This article also addresses the timely issues of cost, outcomes, and overall utility of the robotic platform within these disciplines. Where there is no robust comparative cost data available, it is necessarily omitted. Otherwise, relevant cost data have been included within each section. …
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin LX, Ibrahim AM, Newman NA, Makarov DV, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA (2011) Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites. J Healthc Qual 33:48–52PubMedCrossRef Jin LX, Ibrahim AM, Newman NA, Makarov DV, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA (2011) Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites. J Healthc Qual 33:48–52PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Herzog TJ, Wright JD (2012) The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(174):171–177 Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Herzog TJ, Wright JD (2012) The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(174):171–177
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirkin JN, Lowrance WT, Feifer AH, Mulhall JP, Eastham JE, Elkin EB (2012) Direct-to-consumer internet promotion of robotic prostatectomy exhibits varying quality of information. Health Aff 31:760–769CrossRef Mirkin JN, Lowrance WT, Feifer AH, Mulhall JP, Eastham JE, Elkin EB (2012) Direct-to-consumer internet promotion of robotic prostatectomy exhibits varying quality of information. Health Aff 31:760–769CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schar G (2012) Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120:604–611PubMedCrossRef Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schar G (2012) Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120:604–611PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J (2012) Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2:CD008978 Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J (2012) Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2:CD008978
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309:689–698PubMedCrossRef Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309:689–698PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weissman JS, Zinner M (2013) Comparative effectiveness research on robotic surgery. JAMA 309:721–722PubMedCrossRef Weissman JS, Zinner M (2013) Comparative effectiveness research on robotic surgery. JAMA 309:721–722PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS 16:542–548PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS 16:542–548PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI (2012) Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS 16:519–524PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI (2012) Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS 16:519–524PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783–791PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783–791PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, Chernick M, Dunton CJ (2010) Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:500–503PubMedCrossRef Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, Chernick M, Dunton CJ (2010) Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:500–503PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:730–738PubMedCrossRef Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:730–738PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat AAGL (2013) AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:2–9CrossRef AAGL (2013) AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:2–9CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Breeden JT (2013) Statement on robotic surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden, MD. ACOG website Breeden JT (2013) Statement on robotic surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden, MD. ACOG website
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, Burke WM, Frumovitz MM, Gardner GJ, Havrilesky LJ, Holloway R, Lowe MP, Magrina JF, Moore DH, Soliman PT, Yap S (2012) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a society of gynecologic oncology consensus statement. Developed by the society of gynecologic oncology’s clinical practice robotics task force. Gynecol Oncol 124:180–184PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, Burke WM, Frumovitz MM, Gardner GJ, Havrilesky LJ, Holloway R, Lowe MP, Magrina JF, Moore DH, Soliman PT, Yap S (2012) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a society of gynecologic oncology consensus statement. Developed by the society of gynecologic oncology’s clinical practice robotics task force. Gynecol Oncol 124:180–184PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98:125–129PubMed Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98:125–129PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Moran PS, O’Neill M, Teljeur C, Flattery M, Murphy LA, Smith G, Ryan M (2013) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 20:312–321PubMedCrossRef Moran PS, O’Neill M, Teljeur C, Flattery M, Murphy LA, Smith G, Ryan M (2013) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 20:312–321PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, Pasqualetti P, Calado AA, Mugnier C (2011) Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 8:1503–1512PubMedCrossRef Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, Pasqualetti P, Calado AA, Mugnier C (2011) Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 8:1503–1512PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R (2009) Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 73:119–123PubMedCrossRef Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R (2009) Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 73:119–123PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD (2010) Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. Urol Oncol 28:81–85PubMedCrossRef Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD (2010) Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. Urol Oncol 28:81–85PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA (2012) The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 215:107–114 discussion 114–116PubMedCrossRef Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA (2012) The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 215:107–114 discussion 114–116PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, Vaessen C, de la Taille A, Doumerc N, Rischmann P, Bruyere F, Soustelle L, Droupy S, Roupret M (2013) A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study. BJU Int 111:256–263PubMedCrossRef Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, Vaessen C, de la Taille A, Doumerc N, Rischmann P, Bruyere F, Soustelle L, Droupy S, Roupret M (2013) A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study. BJU Int 111:256–263PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, Lotan Y (2011) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 25:447–453PubMedCrossRef Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, Lotan Y (2011) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 25:447–453PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, Haber GP, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, Kaouk JH (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033PubMedCrossRef Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, Haber GP, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, Kaouk JH (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC (2012) Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 187:1392–1398PubMedCrossRef Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC (2012) Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 187:1392–1398PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Alemozaffar M, Chang SL, Kacker R, Sun M, Dewolf WC, Wagner AA (2013) Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 27(5):560–565PubMedCrossRef Alemozaffar M, Chang SL, Kacker R, Sun M, Dewolf WC, Wagner AA (2013) Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 27(5):560–565PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Panumatrassamee K, Autorino R, Laydner H, Hillyer S, Khalifeh A, Kassab A, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis. Int J Urol 20:484–491PubMedCrossRef Panumatrassamee K, Autorino R, Laydner H, Hillyer S, Khalifeh A, Kassab A, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis. Int J Urol 20:484–491PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F (2007) A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Italiano Urol Androl 79:127–129 Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F (2007) A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Italiano Urol Androl 79:127–129
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Zehnder P, Gill IS (2011) Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 21:415–419PubMedCrossRef Zehnder P, Gill IS (2011) Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 21:415–419PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Rimington P, Coker B, Murphy D, Grieve A, Dasgupta P (2012) A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Prac 66:656–662CrossRef Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Rimington P, Coker B, Murphy D, Grieve A, Dasgupta P (2012) A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Prac 66:656–662CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballantyne GH, Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7:405–412 Ballantyne GH, Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7:405–412
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894PubMedCrossRef Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156PubMedCrossRef Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14:134–156CrossRef Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14:134–156CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466PubMedCrossRef Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, Alasari S, Kim G, Hur H, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1379–1385PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, Alasari S, Kim G, Hur H, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1379–1385PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the united states: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 1–9 Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the united states: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 1–9
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2012) Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 9:CD006578 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2012) Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 9:CD006578
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, Bao SY, Liu JL, Zhang Y, Ren YG (2006) Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobil Pancreatic Dis Int HBPD INT 5:115–118 Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, Bao SY, Liu JL, Zhang Y, Ren YG (2006) Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobil Pancreatic Dis Int HBPD INT 5:115–118
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262PubMedCrossRef Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Gozalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531 Aug 2013CrossRef Gozalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531 Aug 2013CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kacmarek CA, Pack AN, Payne TN (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(3):365–370PubMedCrossRef Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kacmarek CA, Pack AN, Payne TN (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(3):365–370PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Vidovsky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR (2013) Single-Site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg October 28, 2013. Epub ahead of print Vidovsky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR (2013) Single-Site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg October 28, 2013. Epub ahead of print
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Romero-Talamis H, Kroh M (2013) Cholecystectomy by using a surgical robot system. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. September 20, 2013. Epub ahead of print Romero-Talamis H, Kroh M (2013) Cholecystectomy by using a surgical robot system. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. September 20, 2013. Epub ahead of print
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross SB, Sawangkum P, De La Vega KA, Teta A, Luberice K, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): an initial review of safety and feasibility. Miner Chirurg 68(5):435–443 Ross SB, Sawangkum P, De La Vega KA, Teta A, Luberice K, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): an initial review of safety and feasibility. Miner Chirurg 68(5):435–443
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Publiese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 14(8):709–714 Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Publiese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 14(8):709–714
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6:125–131PubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6:125–131PubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Mi J, Kang Y, Chen X, Wang B, Wang Z (2010) Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1803–1814PubMedCrossRef Mi J, Kang Y, Chen X, Wang B, Wang Z (2010) Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1803–1814PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Zheng Q, Jin Z (2012) Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. ANZ J Surg 82:112–117PubMedCrossRef Wang Z, Zheng Q, Jin Z (2012) Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. ANZ J Surg 82:112–117PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ (2005) Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Rel Dis 1:549–554CrossRef Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ (2005) Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Rel Dis 1:549–554CrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P (2011) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot 7:393–400PubMedCrossRef Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P (2011) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot 7:393–400PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M (2011) Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 25:597–603PubMedCrossRef Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M (2011) Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 25:597–603PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, Morel P (2012) Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 22:52–61PubMedCrossRef Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, Morel P (2012) Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 22:52–61PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelson PK, Dumon KR, Sonnad SS, Shafi BM, Williams NN (2011) Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases. Surg Endosc 25:1402–1408PubMedCrossRef Edelson PK, Dumon KR, Sonnad SS, Shafi BM, Williams NN (2011) Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases. Surg Endosc 25:1402–1408PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:295–299PubMedCrossRef Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:295–299PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2288–2294PubMedCrossRef Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2288–2294PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:537–542PubMedCrossRef Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:537–542PubMedCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg 147:272–275PubMedCrossRef Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg 147:272–275PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunaud L, Germain A, Zarnegar R, Cuny T, Ayav A, Bresler L (2011) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:248–254PubMedCrossRef Brunaud L, Germain A, Zarnegar R, Cuny T, Ayav A, Bresler L (2011) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:248–254PubMedCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Spaziani A, Patriti A, Casciola L, Saviano M (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: conventional versus robotic approach—a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:393–398PubMedCrossRef Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Spaziani A, Patriti A, Casciola L, Saviano M (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: conventional versus robotic approach—a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:393–398PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S (2012) Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach. Surg Endosc 26:2802–2809PubMedCrossRef Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Tudor S (2012) Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach. Surg Endosc 26:2802–2809PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25:2004–2009PubMedCrossRef Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25:2004–2009PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148:814–823PubMedCrossRef Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148:814–823PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132PubMedCrossRef Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DH, Klimstra D, Conlon KC (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137:164–168PubMedCrossRef Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DH, Klimstra D, Conlon KC (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137:164–168PubMedCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick ML (2012) Laparoscopic and robotic resection for pancreatic cancer. Cancer J 18:571–576PubMedCrossRef Kendrick ML (2012) Laparoscopic and robotic resection for pancreatic cancer. Cancer J 18:571–576PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657PubMedCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819PubMedCrossRef Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC (2011) Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher SB, Kooby DA (2013) Laparoscopic pancreatectomy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol 107:39–50PubMedCrossRef Fisher SB, Kooby DA (2013) Laparoscopic pancreatectomy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol 107:39–50PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Review of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery
verfasst von
Fred Brody
Nathan G. Richards
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3342-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.