Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2014

01.11.2014

Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using “the PainVision™ system” for quantitative analysis of pain sensation

verfasst von: Masayuki Hiraki, Ichiro Takemasa, Mamoru Uemura, Naotsugu Haraguchi, Junichi Nishimura, Taishi Hata, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Single-site laparoscopic colectomy (SLC) is increasingly performed for colon cancer. There are few reports on invasiveness in SLC. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative pain from SLC, as compared to conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC).

Methods

We compared postoperative pain among patients from the SLC group (n = 11) with those from the MLC group (n = 11) who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer at our institution between May and October 2013. Patients were specifically matched for gender, age, body mass index, tumor size, and performance status. Postoperative pain was evaluated at rest and during mobilization, using a visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative days (PODs) 1–7, and by postoperative frequency of analgesics; pain intensity was evaluated at rest, using the Pain Vision™ system on PODs 1–7. Other operative outcomes of the two groups were also recorded.

Results

Patient demographics, operative outcomes, time duration before first flatus, and C-reactive protein and WBC count on POD 1 showed no significant differences between groups. Results of sequential VAS during mobilization until POD 7 were significantly less in the SLC group than in the MLC group (p = 0.009). However, sequential VAS at rest did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.11). Measured with the Pain Vision™ system, the difference in pain intensity at rest was statistically significant for the postoperative period (p = 0.003). Total requests for analgesics until POD 7 were reduced in the SLC group compared to that in the MLC group, but lacked statistical significance (three vs. seven, respectively, p = 0.07).

Conclusions

In both quantitative and objective measurements using the Pain Vision™ system, SLC significantly reduced postoperative pain. SLC is a promising procedure, associated with less invasiveness than MLC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(3):CD003145 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(3):CD003145
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:375–388PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:375–388PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW, Hellinger M Jr, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5 year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662; discussion 662–654 Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW, Hellinger M Jr, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5 year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662; discussion 662–654
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52PubMedCrossRef Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. BJS 97:1638–1645CrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. BJS 97:1638–1645CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826PubMedCrossRef Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016PubMedCrossRef Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940PubMedCrossRef Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M (2013) Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg endosc 28(4):1110–1118PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M (2013) Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg endosc 28(4):1110–1118PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Leblanc F, Champagne BJ, Augestad KM, Stein SL, Marderstein E, Reynolds HL, Delaney CP (2010) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects, feasibility, and expected benefits. Diagn Ther Endosc 2010:913216PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Leblanc F, Champagne BJ, Augestad KM, Stein SL, Marderstein E, Reynolds HL, Delaney CP (2010) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects, feasibility, and expected benefits. Diagn Ther Endosc 2010:913216PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2003) Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1624–1627PubMedCrossRef Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2003) Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1624–1627PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta A, Shrivastava UK, Kumar P, Burman D (2005) Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Trop Gastroenterol 26:149–151PubMed Gupta A, Shrivastava UK, Kumar P, Burman D (2005) Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Trop Gastroenterol 26:149–151PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK (2007) Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. JSLS 11:358–362PubMedPubMedCentral Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK (2007) Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. JSLS 11:358–362PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerci C, Tarhan OR, Barut I, Bulbul M (2007) Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 54:15–16PubMed Cerci C, Tarhan OR, Barut I, Bulbul M (2007) Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 54:15–16PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69PubMedCrossRef Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734PubMedCrossRef Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung AK, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. BJS 99:1353–1364CrossRef Fung AK, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. BJS 99:1353–1364CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S (1988) Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 18:1007–1019PubMedCrossRef McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S (1988) Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 18:1007–1019PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Seymour RA (1982) The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 23:441–444PubMedCrossRef Seymour RA (1982) The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 23:441–444PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Babul N, Darke AC, Johnson DH, Charron-Vincent K (1993) Using memory for pain in analgesic research. Ann Pharmacother 27:9–12PubMed Babul N, Darke AC, Johnson DH, Charron-Vincent K (1993) Using memory for pain in analgesic research. Ann Pharmacother 27:9–12PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL (1998) The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 86:102–106PubMed DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL (1998) The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 86:102–106PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jefferson JK (1998) Electrodiagnostic functional sensory evaluation of the patient with pain: a review of the neuroselective current perception threshold and pain tolerance threshold. Pain Digest 8:219–230 Jefferson JK (1998) Electrodiagnostic functional sensory evaluation of the patient with pain: a review of the neuroselective current perception threshold and pain tolerance threshold. Pain Digest 8:219–230
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimazu H, Kobayashi H, Seno S, Kato S, Akimoto M, Aizawa S et al (2004) Quantitative Analysis of the Degree of Pain Using Pain-less Electrical Stimuli. 11th International Pain Clinic World Society of Pain Clinicians 451–455 Shimazu H, Kobayashi H, Seno S, Kato S, Akimoto M, Aizawa S et al (2004) Quantitative Analysis of the Degree of Pain Using Pain-less Electrical Stimuli. 11th International Pain Clinic World Society of Pain Clinicians 451–455
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Osada K, Oka H, Isomura T, Nakamura I, Tominaga K, Takahashi S, Kojima A, Nishioka K (2011) Development of the Japanese version of the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (JFIQ): psychometric assessments of reliability and validity. Int J Rheum dis 14:74–80PubMedCrossRef Osada K, Oka H, Isomura T, Nakamura I, Tominaga K, Takahashi S, Kojima A, Nishioka K (2011) Development of the Japanese version of the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (JFIQ): psychometric assessments of reliability and validity. Int J Rheum dis 14:74–80PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HJ, Seo JC, Kwak MA, Park SH, Min BM, Cho MS, Shin I, Jung JY, Roh WS (2014) Acupuncture for low back pain due to spondylolisthesis: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. Trials 15:105PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Lee HJ, Seo JC, Kwak MA, Park SH, Min BM, Cho MS, Shin I, Jung JY, Roh WS (2014) Acupuncture for low back pain due to spondylolisthesis: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. Trials 15:105PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumura H, Imai R, Gondo M, Watanabe K (2012) Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using ‘the PainVision system’ for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects. Int Wound J 9:451–455PubMedCrossRef Matsumura H, Imai R, Gondo M, Watanabe K (2012) Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using ‘the PainVision system’ for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects. Int Wound J 9:451–455PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ota S, Ogawa K, Shimbori H, Oki H, Nakahashi Y, Goto T (2009) Application quantitative measurement device for perception and pain (Pain Vision) to pharmacological challenges. Pain Clin 30:209–214 Ota S, Ogawa K, Shimbori H, Oki H, Nakahashi Y, Goto T (2009) Application quantitative measurement device for perception and pain (Pain Vision) to pharmacological challenges. Pain Clin 30:209–214
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Takemasa I, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Mori M (2010) Video. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2321PubMedCrossRef Takemasa I, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Mori M (2010) Video. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2321PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW (2012) Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 255:667–676PubMedCrossRef Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW (2012) Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 255:667–676PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 213:72–80; discussion 80–72 Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 213:72–80; discussion 80–72
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Chew MH, Chang MH, Tan WS, Wong MT, Tang CL (2013) Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 27:471–477PubMedCrossRef Chew MH, Chang MH, Tan WS, Wong MT, Tang CL (2013) Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 27:471–477PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu CC, Lin SE, Chung KC, Rau KM (2012) Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis 14:e171–e176PubMedCrossRef Lu CC, Lin SE, Chung KC, Rau KM (2012) Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis 14:e171–e176PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, D’Hoore A (2012) Outcomes for case-matched single-port colectomy are comparable with conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Colorectal Dis 14:634–641PubMedCrossRef Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, D’Hoore A (2012) Outcomes for case-matched single-port colectomy are comparable with conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Colorectal Dis 14:634–641PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Stener-Victorin E, Kowalski J, Lundeberg T (2002) A new highly reliable instrument for the assessment of pre- and postoperative gynecological pain. Anesth Analg 95:151–157, table of contents Stener-Victorin E, Kowalski J, Lundeberg T (2002) A new highly reliable instrument for the assessment of pre- and postoperative gynecological pain. Anesth Analg 95:151–157, table of contents
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lahoda R, Stacher G, Bauer P (1977) Experimentally induced pain: measurement of pain threshold and pain tolerance using a new apparatus for electrical stimulation of the skin. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm 15:51–56PubMed Lahoda R, Stacher G, Bauer P (1977) Experimentally induced pain: measurement of pain threshold and pain tolerance using a new apparatus for electrical stimulation of the skin. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm 15:51–56PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using “the PainVision™ system” for quantitative analysis of pain sensation
verfasst von
Masayuki Hiraki
Ichiro Takemasa
Mamoru Uemura
Naotsugu Haraguchi
Junichi Nishimura
Taishi Hata
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hirofumi Yamamoto
Yuichiro Doki
Masaki Mori
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3594-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.