Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2015

01.01.2015

The impact of intra-operative interruptions on surgeons’ perceived workload: an observational study in elective general and orthopedic surgery

verfasst von: Matthias Weigl, Sophia Antoniadis, Costanza Chiapponi, Christiane Bruns, Nick Sevdalis

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aim

Surgeons’ intra-operative workload is critical for effective and safe surgical performance. Detrimental conditions in the operating room (OR) environment may add to perceived workload and jeopardize surgical performance and outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the impact of different intra-operative workflow interruptions on surgeons’ capacity to manage their workload safely and efficiently.

Methods

This was an observational study of intra-operative interruptions and self-rated workload in two surgical specialties (general, orthopedic/trauma surgery). Intra-operative interruptions were assessed via expert observation using a well-validated observation tool. Surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists assessed their intra-operative workload directly after case completion based on three items of the validated Surgery Task Load Index (mental demand, situational stress, distraction).

Results

A total of 56 elective cases (35 open, 21 laparoscopic) with 94 workload ratings were included. Mean intra-operative duration was 1 h 37 min. Intra-operative interruptions were on average observed 9.78 times per hour. People who entered/exited the OR (30.6 %) as well as telephone-/beeper-related disruptions (23.6 %) occurred most often. Equipment and OR environment-related interruptions were associated with highest interference with team functioning particularly in laparoscopic procedures. After identifying task and procedural influences, partial correlational analyses revealed that case-irrelevant communications were negatively associated with surgeons’ mental fatigue and situational stress, whereas surgeons’ reported distraction was increased by case-irrelevant communication and procedural disruptions. OR nurses’ and anesthesiologists’ perceived workload was also related to intra-operative interruption events.

Conclusions

Our study documents the unique contribution of different interruptions on surgeons’ workload; whereas case-irrelevant communications may be beneficial for mental fatigue and stress in routine cases, procedural interruptions and case-irrelevant communication may contribute to surgeons’ mental focus deteriorating. Well-designed OR environments, surgical leadership, and awareness can help to control unnecessary interruptions for effective and safe surgical care.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevdalis N, Sonal A, Undre S, Vincent CA (2009) Distractions and Interruptions in the Operating Room. In: Flin R, Mitchell L (eds) Safer surgery: distractions and interruptions in the operating room. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 405–419 Sevdalis N, Sonal A, Undre S, Vincent CA (2009) Distractions and Interruptions in the Operating Room. In: Flin R, Mitchell L (eds) Safer surgery: distractions and interruptions in the operating room. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 405–419
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiegmann DA, ElBardissi AW, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Sundt TMI (2007) Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 142(5):658–665PubMedCrossRef Wiegmann DA, ElBardissi AW, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Sundt TMI (2007) Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 142(5):658–665PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker SH, Laviana A, Wadhera R, Wiegmann D, Sundt T III (2010) Development and evaluation of an observational tool for assessing surgical flow disruptions and their impact on surgical performance. World J Surg 34(2):353–361PubMedCrossRef Parker SH, Laviana A, Wadhera R, Wiegmann D, Sundt T III (2010) Development and evaluation of an observational tool for assessing surgical flow disruptions and their impact on surgical performance. World J Surg 34(2):353–361PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49(5):589–604PubMedCrossRef Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49(5):589–604PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng B, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanstrom LL (2008) A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 22(10):2171–2177PubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanstrom LL (2008) A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 22(10):2171–2177PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevdalis N, Undre S, McDermott J, Giddie J, Diner L, Smith G (2013) Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments. World J Surg 38(4):751–758 Sevdalis N, Undre S, McDermott J, Giddie J, Diner L, Smith G (2013) Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments. World J Surg 38(4):751–758
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Pract 13(3):390–394PubMedCrossRef Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Pract 13(3):390–394PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart SG, Staveland LE, Hancock PA, Meshkati N (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. Advances in psychology, vol 52. North-Holland, Oxford England, pp 139–183 Hart SG, Staveland LE, Hancock PA, Meshkati N (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. Advances in psychology, vol 52. North-Holland, Oxford England, pp 139–183
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng B, Cassera MA, Martinec DV, Spaun GO, Swanstrom LL (2010) Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks. Surg Endosc 24(1):45–50PubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Cassera MA, Martinec DV, Spaun GO, Swanstrom LL (2010) Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks. Surg Endosc 24(1):45–50PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brixey JJ, Robinson DJ, Johnson CW, Johnson TR, Turley JP, Zhang J (2007) A concept analysis of the phenomenon interruption. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 30(1):E26–E42PubMedCrossRef Brixey JJ, Robinson DJ, Johnson CW, Johnson TR, Turley JP, Zhang J (2007) A concept analysis of the phenomenon interruption. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 30(1):E26–E42PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner BA, Ragland DR, Krause N, Syme SL, Fisher JM (1997) Objective measurement of occupational stress factors-an example with San Francisco urban transit operators. J Occup Health Psychol 2(4):325–342PubMedCrossRef Greiner BA, Ragland DR, Krause N, Syme SL, Fisher JM (1997) Objective measurement of occupational stress factors-an example with San Francisco urban transit operators. J Occup Health Psychol 2(4):325–342PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Weigl M, Müller A, Vincent C, Angerer P, Sevdalis N (2012) The association of workflow interruptions and hospital doctors’ workload: a prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 21(5):399–407PubMedCrossRef Weigl M, Müller A, Vincent C, Angerer P, Sevdalis N (2012) The association of workflow interruptions and hospital doctors’ workload: a prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 21(5):399–407PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M, Nestel D, Moorthy K, Kidd J, Darzi A (2006) The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 191(1):5–10PubMedCrossRef Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M, Nestel D, Moorthy K, Kidd J, Darzi A (2006) The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 191(1):5–10PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Montgomery VL (2007) Effect of fatigue, workload, and environment on patient safety in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 8(2 Suppl):S11–S16PubMedCrossRef Montgomery VL (2007) Effect of fatigue, workload, and environment on patient safety in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 8(2 Suppl):S11–S16PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wetzel CM, Black SA, Hanna GB, Athanasiou T, Kneebone RL, Nestel D, Wolfe JH, Woloshynowych M (2010) The effects of stress and coping on surgical performance during simulations. Ann Surg 251(1):171–176PubMedCrossRef Wetzel CM, Black SA, Hanna GB, Athanasiou T, Kneebone RL, Nestel D, Wolfe JH, Woloshynowych M (2010) The effects of stress and coping on surgical performance during simulations. Ann Surg 251(1):171–176PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevdalis N, Forrest D, Undre S, Darzi A, Vincent C (2008) Annoyances, disruptions, and interruptions in surgery: the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI). World J Surg 32(8):1643–1650PubMedCrossRef Sevdalis N, Forrest D, Undre S, Darzi A, Vincent C (2008) Annoyances, disruptions, and interruptions in surgery: the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI). World J Surg 32(8):1643–1650PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Grundgeiger T, Sanderson P (2009) Interruptions in healthcare: theoretical views. Int J Med Inform 78(5):293–307PubMedCrossRef Grundgeiger T, Sanderson P (2009) Interruptions in healthcare: theoretical views. Int J Med Inform 78(5):293–307PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT (2010) Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care 19(4):304–312PubMedCrossRef Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT (2010) Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care 19(4):304–312PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Oxford, pp 139–183CrossRef Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Oxford, pp 139–183CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin S, France DJ, Hemphill R, Jones I, Chen KY, Rickard D, Makowski R, Aronsky D (2006) Tracking workload in the emergency department. Hum Factors 48(3):526–539PubMedCrossRef Levin S, France DJ, Hemphill R, Jones I, Chen KY, Rickard D, Makowski R, Aronsky D (2006) Tracking workload in the emergency department. Hum Factors 48(3):526–539PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrne AJ, Oliver M, Bodger O, Barnett WA, Williams D, Jones H, Murphy A (2010) Novel method of measuring the mental workload of anaesthetists during clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 105(6):767–771PubMedCrossRef Byrne AJ, Oliver M, Bodger O, Barnett WA, Williams D, Jones H, Murphy A (2010) Novel method of measuring the mental workload of anaesthetists during clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 105(6):767–771PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreatta PB, Hillard M, Krain LP (2010) The impact of stress factors in simulation-based laparoscopic training. Surgery 147(5):631–639PubMedCrossRef Andreatta PB, Hillard M, Krain LP (2010) The impact of stress factors in simulation-based laparoscopic training. Surgery 147(5):631–639PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Allport DA, Antonis B, Reynolds P (1972) On the division of attention: a disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Q J Exp Psychol 24(2):225–235PubMedCrossRef Allport DA, Antonis B, Reynolds P (1972) On the division of attention: a disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Q J Exp Psychol 24(2):225–235PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jett QR, George JM (2003) Work interrupted: a closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad Manage Rev 28(3):494–507 Jett QR, George JM (2003) Work interrupted: a closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad Manage Rev 28(3):494–507
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan L, Robertson E, Hadi M, Catchpole K, Pickering S, New S, Collins G, McCulloch P (2013) Capturing intraoperative process deviations using a direct observational approach: the glitch method. BMJ Open 3(11):e003519PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Morgan L, Robertson E, Hadi M, Catchpole K, Pickering S, New S, Collins G, McCulloch P (2013) Capturing intraoperative process deviations using a direct observational approach: the glitch method. BMJ Open 3(11):e003519PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Brixey JJ, Robinson DJ, Turley JP, Zhang J (2010) The roles of MDs and RNs as initiators and recipients of interruptions in workflow. Int J Med Inform 79(6):e109–e115PubMedCrossRef Brixey JJ, Robinson DJ, Turley JP, Zhang J (2010) The roles of MDs and RNs as initiators and recipients of interruptions in workflow. Int J Med Inform 79(6):e109–e115PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH (2000) Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians “interrupt-driven” and “multitasking”? Acad Emerg Med 7(11):1239–1243PubMedCrossRef Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH (2000) Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians “interrupt-driven” and “multitasking”? Acad Emerg Med 7(11):1239–1243PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Magrabi F, Li SY, Day RO, Coiera E (2010) Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17(5):575–583PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Magrabi F, Li SY, Day RO, Coiera E (2010) Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17(5):575–583PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Li SY, Magrabi F, Coiera E (2012) A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19(1):6–12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Li SY, Magrabi F, Coiera E (2012) A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19(1):6–12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P, Akeroyd MA, Hilditch G (2011) Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 66(3):175–179PubMedCrossRef Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P, Akeroyd MA, Hilditch G (2011) Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 66(3):175–179PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R (2010) The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147(3):318–330PubMedCrossRef Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R (2010) The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147(3):318–330PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of intra-operative interruptions on surgeons’ perceived workload: an observational study in elective general and orthopedic surgery
verfasst von
Matthias Weigl
Sophia Antoniadis
Costanza Chiapponi
Christiane Bruns
Nick Sevdalis
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3668-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.