Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2015

01.04.2015 | Review

Consumer demand for surgical innovation: a systematic review of public perception of NOTES

verfasst von: Philip H. Pucher, Mikael H. Sodergren, Amy C. Lord, Julian Teare, Guang-Zhong Yang, Ara Darzi

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The full scope of benefits offered by NOTES over traditional laparoscopy, if any, is not yet fully clear. Perceived patient demand for truly “scarless surgery” is often referenced one of the driving factors in the continued development of this relatively new technique. The true scale of patient preference and demand for NOTES as a surgical technique is unknown. This review aims to summarise currently available literature on the topic of patient perceptions of NOTES to guide future development of the technique.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases was performed on 1st Jan 2014. To be considered for inclusion, articles were required to assess and report the perception of NOTES in a sample of laypersons (patients or general public). The primary endpoint assessed was acceptance or preference rates expressed by patients for NOTES procedures. Reasons given for preference or rejection of NOTES were recorded, as well as preferred access routes and any predicting factors of NOTES acceptance.

Results

Initial search returned 1,334 results, resulting in 15 articles included in final data synthesis. These polled a total of 4,420 subjects. Acceptance of NOTES ranged between 41 and 84 %. Compared to a laparoscopic approach, preference rates for NOTES ranged from 0 to 78 %. Reasons for preferring NOTES were largely centred on potentially reduced recovery time, complications (particularly with reference to hernias) and postoperative pain. Improved cosmesis also played a role, but was secondary to the above issues. Overall, study quality was poor.

Conclusions

This review suggests significant public interest in NOTES and scarless surgery in general. Further research and consideration of differences in public perceptions across regions, countries and cultures are required.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Litynski GS (1998) Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2(4):341–346PubMedCentralPubMed Litynski GS (1998) Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2(4):341–346PubMedCentralPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(5):695CrossRefPubMed Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(5):695CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–117CrossRefPubMed Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–117CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 207(4):613–622CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 207(4):613–622CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson KK, Singh KK, Sayegh M (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36(11):2644–2653CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson KK, Singh KK, Sayegh M (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36(11):2644–2653CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252(2):263–270CrossRefPubMed Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252(2):263–270CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sodergren MH, Pucher P, Clark J, James DR, Sockett J, Matar N, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2011) Disinfection of the access orifice in NOTES: evaluation of the evidence base. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011:245175CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sodergren MH, Pucher P, Clark J, James DR, Sockett J, Matar N, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2011) Disinfection of the access orifice in NOTES: evaluation of the evidence base. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011:245175CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieder E, Spaun GO, Khajanchee YS, Martinec DV, Arnold BN, Smith Sehdev AE, Swanstrom LL, Whiteford MH (2011) A natural orifice transrectal approach for oncologic resection of the rectosigmoid: an experimental study and comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 25(10):3357–3363CrossRefPubMed Rieder E, Spaun GO, Khajanchee YS, Martinec DV, Arnold BN, Smith Sehdev AE, Swanstrom LL, Whiteford MH (2011) A natural orifice transrectal approach for oncologic resection of the rectosigmoid: an experimental study and comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 25(10):3357–3363CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvao Neto MP, Ramos A, Salinas G, Burghardt J, DeCarli L, Henrique Sousa L, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Branco AJ, Balashanmugan TS, Boza C, Corcione F, D’Avila Avila F, Arturo Gomez N, Galvao Ribeiro PA, Martins S, Filgueiras M, Gellert K, Wood Branco A, Kondo W, Inacio Sanseverino J, de Sousa JA, Saavedra L, Ramirez E, Campos J, Sivakumar K, Rajan PS, Jategaonkar PA, Ranagrajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M, Cuccurullo D, Cuccurullo D, Muller V (2010) International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery–NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov 17(2):142–158CrossRefPubMed Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvao Neto MP, Ramos A, Salinas G, Burghardt J, DeCarli L, Henrique Sousa L, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Branco AJ, Balashanmugan TS, Boza C, Corcione F, D’Avila Avila F, Arturo Gomez N, Galvao Ribeiro PA, Martins S, Filgueiras M, Gellert K, Wood Branco A, Kondo W, Inacio Sanseverino J, de Sousa JA, Saavedra L, Ramirez E, Campos J, Sivakumar K, Rajan PS, Jategaonkar PA, Ranagrajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M, Cuccurullo D, Cuccurullo D, Muller V (2010) International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery–NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov 17(2):142–158CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao A, Kynaston J, MacDonald ER, Ahmed I (2010) Patient preferences for surgical techniques: should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc 24(12):3016–3025CrossRefPubMed Rao A, Kynaston J, MacDonald ER, Ahmed I (2010) Patient preferences for surgical techniques: should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc 24(12):3016–3025CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rattner D, Kalloo A, Group ASW (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333CrossRefPubMed Rattner D, Kalloo A, Group ASW (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S, Ris F, Chilcott M, Morel P (2011) Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery? Surg Endosc 25(2):408–415CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S, Ris F, Chilcott M, Morel P (2011) Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery? Surg Endosc 25(2):408–415CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsang ME, Theman K, Mercer D, Hopman WM, Hookey L (2012) Patient perceptions of natural orifice translumenal surgery. Minim Invasive Surg 2012:317249PubMedCentralPubMed Tsang ME, Theman K, Mercer D, Hopman WM, Hookey L (2012) Patient perceptions of natural orifice translumenal surgery. Minim Invasive Surg 2012:317249PubMedCentralPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vander Velpen GC, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1993) Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach. Gut 34(10):1448–1451CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Vander Velpen GC, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1993) Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach. Gut 34(10):1448–1451CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Strickland AD, Norwood MG, Behnia-Willison F, Olakkengil SA, Hewett PJ (2010) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a survey of women’s views on a new technique. Surg Endosc 24(10):2424–2431CrossRefPubMed Strickland AD, Norwood MG, Behnia-Willison F, Olakkengil SA, Hewett PJ (2010) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a survey of women’s views on a new technique. Surg Endosc 24(10):2424–2431CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sulz MC, Zerz A, Sagmeister M, Roll T, Meyenberger C (2013) Perception of preference and risk-taking in laparoscopy, transgastric, and rigid-hybrid transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Swiss Med Wkly 143:w13888PubMed Sulz MC, Zerz A, Sagmeister M, Roll T, Meyenberger C (2013) Perception of preference and risk-taking in laparoscopy, transgastric, and rigid-hybrid transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Swiss Med Wkly 143:w13888PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Teoh AY, Ng EK, Chock A, Swanstrom L, Varadarajulu S, Chiu PW (2013) Asian-Chinese patient perceptions of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy. Dig Endosc 26(3):458–466CrossRefPubMed Teoh AY, Ng EK, Chock A, Swanstrom L, Varadarajulu S, Chiu PW (2013) Asian-Chinese patient perceptions of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy. Dig Endosc 26(3):458–466CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross SB, Hernandez JM, Sperry S, Morton CA, Vice M, Luberice K, Rosemurgy AS (2012) Public perception of LESS surgery and NOTES. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):344–355CrossRefPubMed Ross SB, Hernandez JM, Sperry S, Morton CA, Vice M, Luberice K, Rosemurgy AS (2012) Public perception of LESS surgery and NOTES. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):344–355CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bingener J, Sloan JA, Ghosh K, McConico A, Mariani A (2012) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of women’s perceptions of transvaginal surgery. Surg Endosc 26(4):998–1004CrossRefPubMed Bingener J, Sloan JA, Ghosh K, McConico A, Mariani A (2012) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of women’s perceptions of transvaginal surgery. Surg Endosc 26(4):998–1004CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CH, Kim SR, Lee HA, Kim SH, Chae HD, Kang BM (2011) Transvaginal ultrasound-guided radiofrequency myolysis for uterine myomas. Hum Reprod 26(3):559–563CrossRefPubMed Kim CH, Kim SR, Lee HA, Kim SH, Chae HD, Kang BM (2011) Transvaginal ultrasound-guided radiofrequency myolysis for uterine myomas. Hum Reprod 26(3):559–563CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocchietto S, Scozzari G, Arezzo A, Morino M (2012) Obese women’s perception of bariatric trans-vaginal NOTES. Obes Surg 22(3):452–459CrossRefPubMed Rocchietto S, Scozzari G, Arezzo A, Morino M (2012) Obese women’s perception of bariatric trans-vaginal NOTES. Obes Surg 22(3):452–459CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67(6):854–860CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67(6):854–860CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P (2011) Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 25(7):2308–2315CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P (2011) Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 25(7):2308–2315CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23(8):1770–1774CrossRefPubMed Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23(8):1770–1774CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MC, Kim KH, Jang JS, Kwon HC, Kim BG, Rattner DW (2012) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in an endoscopy screening program in Korea. Yonsei Med J 53(5):960–967CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kim MC, Kim KH, Jang JS, Kwon HC, Kim BG, Rattner DW (2012) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in an endoscopy screening program in Korea. Yonsei Med J 53(5):960–967CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hucl T, Saglova A, Benes M, Kocik M, Oliverius M, Valenta Z, Spicak J (2012) Patient and physician perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic appendectomy. World J Gastroenterol 18(15):1800–1805CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hucl T, Saglova A, Benes M, Kocik M, Oliverius M, Valenta Z, Spicak J (2012) Patient and physician perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic appendectomy. World J Gastroenterol 18(15):1800–1805CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Olakkengil SA, Norwood MG, Strickland AD, Behnia-Willison F, Mohan Rao M, Hewett PJ (2010) Perspectives of laparoscopic donors toward a new procedure: transvaginal donor nephrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(10):803–806CrossRefPubMed Olakkengil SA, Norwood MG, Strickland AD, Behnia-Willison F, Mohan Rao M, Hewett PJ (2010) Perspectives of laparoscopic donors toward a new procedure: transvaginal donor nephrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(10):803–806CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(7):1519–1525CrossRefPubMed Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(7):1519–1525CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Li W, Xu H, Wang ZK, Fan ZN, Ba SD, Zou DW, Ren X, Hu B, Huang YH, Sun MJ, Liu J, Li W, Xu P, Zhu Q, Liu SD, Xiao JG (2011) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): patients’ perceptions and attitudes. Dig Dis Sci 56(8):2415–2422CrossRefPubMed Li W, Xu H, Wang ZK, Fan ZN, Ba SD, Zou DW, Ren X, Hu B, Huang YH, Sun MJ, Liu J, Li W, Xu P, Zhu Q, Liu SD, Xiao JG (2011) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): patients’ perceptions and attitudes. Dig Dis Sci 56(8):2415–2422CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Consumer demand for surgical innovation: a systematic review of public perception of NOTES
verfasst von
Philip H. Pucher
Mikael H. Sodergren
Amy C. Lord
Julian Teare
Guang-Zhong Yang
Ara Darzi
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3769-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.