Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2015

01.08.2015 | Video

Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resection of lesions in the central segments: feasible, safe, and effective

verfasst von: Claudius Conrad, Satoshi Ogiso, Yosuke Inoue, Nairuthya Shivathirthan, Brice Gayet

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Here we report the first systematic evaluation of laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing segmentectomies for the resection of lesions in the central liver segments and the first series of laparoscopic mesohepatectomies.

Patients and Methods

From 1995 to 2012, 482 laparoscopic hepatectomies were performed. Thirty-two patients underwent isolated resection of IVa and VIII, bisegmentectomies of IVa/IVb and V/VIII, or mesohepatectomy. Sixteen isolated resections of IVb or V were excluded. Data was extracted from a retrolective database and chart review. Complications were classified (Clavien–Dindo) by three independent surgeons. Seventeen patients had colorectal liver metastasis, four had neuroendocrine tumors, five had hepatocellular carcinoma, two had GIST, and one each had esophageal cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. Fifteen patients underwent anatomic- and 17 non-anatomic wedge resection. Average blood loss was 403 cc (SD 475), and overall operative time was 183 (SD 106) for hepatectomy and 253 min (SD 94) for mesohepatectomies. Major complications were mainly attributable to synchronous procedures. Mortality, transfusion, and morbidity rates were 0, 12, and 37 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Parenchymal-sparing laparoscopic central liver resections and mesohepatectomies are feasible, safe, and effective if specific technical details we have learned over time are considered. Concomitant procedures should be an exception. This approach exhibits an alternative to open surgery while avoiding unnecessary sacrifice of functional parenchyma.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145:1109–1118PubMedCrossRef Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145:1109–1118PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chouillard E, Cherqui D, Tayar C, Brunetti F, Fagniez PL (2003) Anatomical bi- and trisegmentectomies as alternatives to extensive liver resections. Ann Surg 238:29–34PubMedCentralPubMed Chouillard E, Cherqui D, Tayar C, Brunetti F, Fagniez PL (2003) Anatomical bi- and trisegmentectomies as alternatives to extensive liver resections. Ann Surg 238:29–34PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen XP, Qiu FZ, Lau WY, Zhang BX, Chen YF, Zhang WG, He SQ (2008) Mesohepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a study of 256 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:543–546PubMedCrossRef Chen XP, Qiu FZ, Lau WY, Zhang BX, Chen YF, Zhang WG, He SQ (2008) Mesohepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a study of 256 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:543–546PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stratopoulos C, Soonawalla Z, Brockmann J, Hoffmann K, Friend PJ (2007) Central hepatectomy: the golden mean for treating central liver tumors? Surg Oncol 16:99–106PubMedCrossRef Stratopoulos C, Soonawalla Z, Brockmann J, Hoffmann K, Friend PJ (2007) Central hepatectomy: the golden mean for treating central liver tumors? Surg Oncol 16:99–106PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, McDonough J, ReMine SG (2003) Resection of central hepatic malignant lesions. Am Surg 69:186–189PubMed Jacobs M, McDonough J, ReMine SG (2003) Resection of central hepatic malignant lesions. Am Surg 69:186–189PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu RH, Lee PH, Chang YC, Ho MC, Yu SC (2003) Treatment of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma with central hepatectomy. Surgery 133:251–256PubMedCrossRef Hu RH, Lee PH, Chang YC, Ho MC, Yu SC (2003) Treatment of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma with central hepatectomy. Surgery 133:251–256PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Roshanaei N, Fonouni H, Muller SA, Schmied BM, Hinz U, Weitz J, Buchler MW, Schmidt J (2008) Mesohepatectomy as an option for the treatment of central liver tumors. J Am Col Surg 207:499–509CrossRef Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Roshanaei N, Fonouni H, Muller SA, Schmied BM, Hinz U, Weitz J, Buchler MW, Schmidt J (2008) Mesohepatectomy as an option for the treatment of central liver tumors. J Am Col Surg 207:499–509CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat McBride CM, Wallace S (1972) Cancer of the right lobe of the liver: a variety of operative procedures. Arch Surg 105:289–296PubMedCrossRef McBride CM, Wallace S (1972) Cancer of the right lobe of the liver: a variety of operative procedures. Arch Surg 105:289–296PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) Totally laparoscopic central hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1153PubMedCrossRef Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) Totally laparoscopic central hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1153PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Ahn KS (2009) Totally laparoscopic central bisectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:653–656CrossRef Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Ahn KS (2009) Totally laparoscopic central bisectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:653–656CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Machado MA, Kalil AN (2011) Glissonian approach for laparoscopic mesohepatectomy. Surg Endosc 25:2020–2022PubMedCrossRef Machado MA, Kalil AN (2011) Glissonian approach for laparoscopic mesohepatectomy. Surg Endosc 25:2020–2022PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM (2000) For the international hepato-pancreato-biliary association terminology committee survey. the Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:33–39 Strasberg SM (2000) For the international hepato-pancreato-biliary association terminology committee survey. the Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:33–39
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Miwa S, Kobayashi A, Akahane Y, Nakata T, Mihara M, Kusama K, Ogawa S, Soeda J, Miyagawa S (2007) Is major hepatectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy justified for advanced biliary malignancy? J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 14:136–141CrossRef Miwa S, Kobayashi A, Akahane Y, Nakata T, Mihara M, Kusama K, Ogawa S, Soeda J, Miyagawa S (2007) Is major hepatectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy justified for advanced biliary malignancy? J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 14:136–141CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, Corvera C, Weber S, Blumgart LH (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–406PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, Corvera C, Weber S, Blumgart LH (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–406PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu CC, Ho WL, Chen JT, Tang CS, Yeh DC, Liu TJ, P’Eng FK (1999) Mesohepatectomy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: an appraisal of a rare procedure. J Am Coll Surg 188:508–515PubMedCrossRef Wu CC, Ho WL, Chen JT, Tang CS, Yeh DC, Liu TJ, P’Eng FK (1999) Mesohepatectomy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: an appraisal of a rare procedure. J Am Coll Surg 188:508–515PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Scudamore CH, Buczkowski AK, Shayan H, Ho SG, Legiehn GM, Chung SW, Owen DA (2000) Mesohepatectomy. Am J Surg 179:356–360PubMedCrossRef Scudamore CH, Buczkowski AK, Shayan H, Ho SG, Legiehn GM, Chung SW, Owen DA (2000) Mesohepatectomy. Am J Surg 179:356–360PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M (2005) Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 242:252–259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M (2005) Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 242:252–259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Ikai I, Kudo M, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Monden M, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Takayasu K (2008) Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery 143:469–475PubMedCrossRef Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Ikai I, Kudo M, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Monden M, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Takayasu K (2008) Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery 143:469–475PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Eltawil KM, Kidd M, Giovinazzo F, Helmy AH, Salem RR (2010) Differentiating the impact of anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection on early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 8:43PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Eltawil KM, Kidd M, Giovinazzo F, Helmy AH, Salem RR (2010) Differentiating the impact of anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection on early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 8:43PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resection of lesions in the central segments: feasible, safe, and effective
verfasst von
Claudius Conrad
Satoshi Ogiso
Yosuke Inoue
Nairuthya Shivathirthan
Brice Gayet
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3924-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.