Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2015

01.09.2015

The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study

verfasst von: Erin Bresnahan, Andrew Bates, Andrew Wu, Mark Reiner, Brian Jacob

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The use of self-gripping mesh during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repairs may eliminate the need for any additional fixation, and thus reduce post-operative pain without the added concern for mesh migration. Long-term outcomes are not yet prospectively studied in a controlled fashion.

Methods

Under IRB approval, from January 2011–April 2013, 91 hernias were repaired laparoscopically with self-gripping mesh without additional fixation. Patients were followed for at least 1 year. Demographics and intraoperative data (defect location, size, and mesh deployment time) are recorded. VAS is used in the recovery room (RR) to score pain, and the Carolinas Comfort Scale ™ (CCS), a validated 0–5 pain/quality of life (QoL) score where a mean score of >1.0 means symptomatic pain, is employed at 2 weeks and at 1 year. Morbidities, narcotic usage, days to full activity and return to work, and CCS scores are reported.

Results

Sixty two patients, with 91 hernias repaired with self-gripping mesh, completed follow-up at a mean time period of 14.8 months. Seventeen hernias were direct defects (average size 3.0 cm). Mesh deployment time was 193.7 s. RR pain was 1.1/10 using a VAS. Total average oxycodone/acetaminophen (5 mg/325 mg) usage = 5.0 tablets, days to full activity was 1.6, and return to work was 4.2 days. Thirteen small asymptomatic seromas were palpated without any recurrences or groin tenderness, and all seromas resolved by the 6 month visit. Transient testis discomfort was reported in five patients. Urinary retention was 3.2 %. Mean CCS™ scores at the first visit for groin pain laying, bending, sitting, walking, and step-climbing were 0.2, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.3, respectively. At the first post op visit, 4.8 % had symptomatic pain (CCS > 1). At 14.8 months, no patients reported symptomatic pain with CCS scores for all 62 patients averaging 0.02, (range 0–0.43). There are no recurrences thus far.

Conclusions

Self-gripping mesh can be safely used during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repairs; our cohort had a rapid recovery, and at the 1-year follow-up visit, there were no recurrences and no patients reported any chronic pain as defined by a CCS™ > 1.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83(5):1045–1051 v–viCrossRef Rotkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83(5):1045–1051 v–viCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor C et al (2008) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(3):757–762CrossRefPubMed Taylor C et al (2008) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22(3):757–762CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Heniford TB (2011) Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg 254(5):709–715CrossRefPubMed Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Heniford TB (2011) Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg 254(5):709–715CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosai N, Sutton PA, Evans J, Varghese J (2011) Laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair using a novel self-adhesive mesh. J Minimal Access Surg 7(3):192–194CrossRef Kosai N, Sutton PA, Evans J, Varghese J (2011) Laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair using a novel self-adhesive mesh. J Minimal Access Surg 7(3):192–194CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kingsnorth A, Nienhuijs S, Schüle S, Appel P, Ziprin P, Eklund A, Smeds S (2010) Preliminary results of a comparative randomized study: benefit of self-gripping Parietex Progrip™ mesh. Hernia 14:0–001 Kingsnorth A, Nienhuijs S, Schüle S, Appel P, Ziprin P, Eklund A, Smeds S (2010) Preliminary results of a comparative randomized study: benefit of self-gripping Parietex Progrip™ mesh. Hernia 14:0–001
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kingsnorth A (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex Progrip polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16(3):287–294CrossRefPubMed Kingsnorth A (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex Progrip polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16(3):287–294CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Heniford T, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW (2008) Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 206(4):638–644CrossRefPubMed Heniford T, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW (2008) Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 206(4):638–644CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Stoppa R, Wantz GE, Felix EL, Crafton WB (1997) Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg 225(4):422PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Stoppa R, Wantz GE, Felix EL, Crafton WB (1997) Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg 225(4):422PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng WT, Auyeung K (2008) An inexpensive and effective technique for hernioplasty mesh anchorage. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 18(2):228–229CrossRef Ng WT, Auyeung K (2008) An inexpensive and effective technique for hernioplasty mesh anchorage. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 18(2):228–229CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Melissa CS, Bun TA, Wing CK, Chung TY, Wai NE, Tat LH (2013) Randomized double-blinded prospective trial of fibrin sealant spray versus mechanical stapling in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty. Ann Surg 259(3):432–437CrossRef Melissa CS, Bun TA, Wing CK, Chung TY, Wai NE, Tat LH (2013) Randomized double-blinded prospective trial of fibrin sealant spray versus mechanical stapling in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty. Ann Surg 259(3):432–437CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollinsky C et al (2009) Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model. JACS 208(6):1–1107 Hollinsky C et al (2009) Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model. JACS 208(6):1–1107
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A (2010) Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure—a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(4):317–322CrossRefPubMed Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A (2010) Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure—a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(4):317–322CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fumagalli RU, Puccetti F, Elmore U, Massaron S, Rosati R (2013) Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison. Surg Endosc 5:1798–1802CrossRef Fumagalli RU, Puccetti F, Elmore U, Massaron S, Rosati R (2013) Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison. Surg Endosc 5:1798–1802CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Birk D, Hess S, Garcia-Pardo C (2013) Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGrip™ mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean follow-up at 23 months. Hernia 17(3):313–320CrossRefPubMed Birk D, Hess S, Garcia-Pardo C (2013) Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGrip™ mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean follow-up at 23 months. Hernia 17(3):313–320CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoury N (1998) A randomized prospective controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair and mesh-plug hernioplasty: a study of 315 cases. J Laparosc Adv Surg Tech 8(6):367–372CrossRef Khoury N (1998) A randomized prospective controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair and mesh-plug hernioplasty: a study of 315 cases. J Laparosc Adv Surg Tech 8(6):367–372CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar Bansal V et al (2013) A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia dfrepair. Surg Endosc 27:2373–2382CrossRefPubMed Kumar Bansal V et al (2013) A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia dfrepair. Surg Endosc 27:2373–2382CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study
verfasst von
Erin Bresnahan
Andrew Bates
Andrew Wu
Mark Reiner
Brian Jacob
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3991-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.