nach oben

Surgical Endoscopy

Erschienen in:

01.01.2016

Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

verfasst von: J. Abrisqueta, N. Ibañez, J. Luján, Q. Hernández, P. Parrilla

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Since the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, there has been a controversy between creating an intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in right hemicolectomy. The purpose is to report our experience in intracorporeal anastomosis following right hemicolectomy in both malignant and benign pathologies.

Study design

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was conducted at Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinical University Hospital (Murcia) between January 2000 and April 2014. The study includes all surgery patients who received a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. The criteria for exclusion were conversion to open surgery during the procedure due to technical difficulties during dissect. Tumours considered T4 were not excluded, nor were stage IV patients or those with a history of previous abdominal surgery.

Results

There were 173 patients (63 females) aged 67 (range 14–91) years, with body mass index of 27 (17–52) kg/m² and ASA 1:2:3:4 of 12:78:68:15; 41 % had previous abdominal surgery and 70 % had a pre-existing comorbidity. Operating time was 142 (60–270) min. Specimen extraction site incision length was 8.1 (6–11.1) cm. Conversion rate was 9.2 %, and there were 39 complications (22.54 %) and 9 reoperations (5.2 %). Readmission rate was 5.2 %. Length of stay was 5.7 (1–35) days.

Conclusion

The intracorporeal procedure is a safe and feasible alternative for creating an ileocolic anastomosis. It involves a similar rate of complications and may prevent some of the drawbacks presented by extracorporeal anastomosis.

Baixauili J, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Fazio VW (2003) Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 46:550–553CrossRef

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317PubMedPubMedCentral

Schinkert RT (1991) Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34(11):1030–1031CrossRef

Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2008) The long term results of randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7PubMedCrossRef

The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef

Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52PubMedCrossRef

Chaves JA, Idoate CP, Fons JB et al (2011) A case control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Cirugía Española 89:24–30PubMedCrossRef

Fabozzi M, Allieta R, Contul RB et al (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case–control study. Surg Endosc 24:2085–2091PubMedCrossRef

10.

Casciola L, Ceccarelli G, Di ZittiL (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58:621–627PubMed

11.

Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H (2000) Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 43:267–271PubMedCrossRef

12.

Senagore A, Delaney C, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679CrossRef

13.

Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy–systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13PubMedCrossRef

14.

Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767PubMedCrossRef

15.

Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1177–1186PubMedCrossRef

16.

Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891PubMedCrossRef

17.

Scatizzi M, Kroning K, Borrelli A et al (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case–control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908PubMedCrossRef

18.

Chang K, Fakhoury M, Barnajian M, Tarta C, Bergamaschi R (2013) Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 27:1730–1736PubMedCrossRef

19.

Blumberg D (2003) Laparoscopic colectomy performed using a completely intracorporeal technique is associated with similar outcomes in obese and thin patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:57–61CrossRef

20.

Franklin ME, CW, Salzmnn MD, Russek K, Garza U (2012) Comparative study between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomoses in right hemicolectomy. In: SAGES annual meeting

21.

Causey MW, Oguntoye M, Steele SR (2011) Incidence of complications following colectomy with mesenteric closure versus no mesenteric closure: does it really matter? J Surg Res 171:571–575PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kornmann VNN, Hagendoorn J, van Koeverden S, van Rambshorst B, Smits AB (2013) Totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is a technically and oncologically safe procedure. Acta Chir Belg 113:439–443PubMed

23.

Samia H, Lawrence J, Nobel T et al (2013) Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline? Am J Surg 205(3):264–267 discussion 268PubMedCrossRef

24.

Drosdeck J, Harzman A, Suzo A et al (2013) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(12):4574–4580PubMedCrossRef

25.

Lauscher JC, Grittner F, Stroux A (2012) Reduction of wound infections in laparoscopic-assisted colorectal resections by plastic wound ring drapes (REDWIL)?—a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(7):1079–1085PubMedCrossRef

26.

Pereira JA, Pera M, Grande L (2013) Incidence of incisional hernia after open and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cirugía Española 91(1):44–49PubMedCrossRef

27.

Claes K, Beckers R, Heindryckx E et al (2014) Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan. Hernia 18(6):797–802PubMedCrossRef

28.

Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH et al (2002) Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1420–1425PubMedCrossRef

29.

Ihedioha U, Mackay G, Leung E et al (2008) Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 22:689–692PubMedCrossRef

30.

Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S et al (2008) Does the extraction—site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600PubMedCrossRef

31.

Lee L, Mappin-Kasirer B, Sender Liberman A et al (2012) High incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia after midline extraction in laparoscopic colon resection. Surg Endosc 26(11):3180–3185PubMedCrossRef

32.

O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel 1:17–22

33.

Nieuwenhuizen J, Halm JA, Jeekel J et al (2007) Natural course of incisional hernia and indications for repair. Scand J Surg 96:293–296PubMed

Titel: Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
verfasst von: J. Abrisqueta
N. Ibañez
J. Luján
Q. Hernández
P. Parrilla
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4162-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Study design

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review

One- and ten-year outcome of laparoscopic anterior 120° versus total fundoplication: a double-blind, randomized multicenter study

Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry

Laparoscopic suturing learning curve in an open versus closed box trainer

Endoscopic electrocautery dilation of benign anastomotic colonic strictures: a single-center experience

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“