Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2016

01.03.2016

Phase II clinical experience and long-term follow-up using the next-generation single-incision platform FMX314

verfasst von: Martin Berducci, Hans F. Fuchs, Pablo Omelanczuk, Ryan C. Broderick, Cristina R. Harnsberger, Joshua Langert, Jorge Nefa, Pablo Jaureguiberry, Pablo Gomez, Laura Miranda, Garth R. Jacobsen, Bryan J. Sandler, Santiago Horgan

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Single-incision minimally invasive surgery has previously been associated with incisions 2.0–3.0 cm in length. We present a novel single-incision surgical platform compatible for insertion through a standard 15-mm trocar we previously described in six patients with short-term follow-up data. The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the platform in a larger collective and to evaluate 1-year follow-up data of the phase I trial.

Methods

The technology features a multiple-use introducer, accommodating the articulating instruments, and is inserted through a 15-mm laparoscopic trocar. Cholecystectomy is performed through an umbilical incision. A prospective feasibility study was performed at a single center. Inclusion criteria were age of 18–75 years and biliary colic, exclusion criteria were acute cholecystitis, dilation of the biliary tree, severe coagulopathy, BMI > 40 kg/m2, or choledocholithiasis. Endpoints included complications, length of stay, pain medication, cosmetic results, and the presence of hernia.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (23 females; phase I: 6 patients, phase II: 21 patients) with an average age of 41.7 years and BMI 26.6 kg/m2 were recruited for the study. Umbilical incision length did not exceed 15 mm. There were no intraoperative complications. Average OR time decreased from 91 min for the first six cases to 56 min for the last six cases. Average length of stay was 7.8 h. Pain control was achieved with diclofenac for no more than 7 days. All patients had no adverse events at 5-month follow-up, and all phase I patients had no adverse events nor evidence of umbilical hernia at 1 year.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that single-incision cholecystectomy with the platform is feasible, safe, and reproducible in a larger patient population. Long-term follow-up showed no hernias or other adverse events. Further studies will be needed to evaluate longer-term hernia rates.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Litynski GS (1996) Highlights in the history of laparoscopy. Barbara Bernert Verlag, Frankfurt, pp 165–168 Litynski GS (1996) Highlights in the history of laparoscopy. Barbara Bernert Verlag, Frankfurt, pp 165–168
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mühe E (1992) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24:754–758CrossRefPubMed Mühe E (1992) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24:754–758CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231PubMed Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KW, Park JI, Nam SH (2013) The feasibility and safety of a three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a 2 mm mini-instrument. Hepatogastroenterology 60(122):281–285PubMed Kim KW, Park JI, Nam SH (2013) The feasibility and safety of a three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a 2 mm mini-instrument. Hepatogastroenterology 60(122):281–285PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans SF, Petrucco OM (1998) Microlaparoscopy for suspected pelvic pathology–a comparison of 2 mm versus 10 mm laparoscope. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 38(2):215–216CrossRefPubMed Evans SF, Petrucco OM (1998) Microlaparoscopy for suspected pelvic pathology–a comparison of 2 mm versus 10 mm laparoscope. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 38(2):215–216CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda F, Abrão MS, Podgaec S, Nogueira AP, Neme RM, Pinotti JA (2001) Microlaparoscopy in gynecology: analysis of 16 cases and review of literature. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 56(4):115–118CrossRefPubMed Ikeda F, Abrão MS, Podgaec S, Nogueira AP, Neme RM, Pinotti JA (2001) Microlaparoscopy in gynecology: analysis of 16 cases and review of literature. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 56(4):115–118CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nijhawan S, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Majid S, Jacobsen GR, Sedrak MF, Sandler BJ, Talamini MA, Horgan S (2013) NOTES transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy: the United States human experience. Surg Endosc 27(2):514–517CrossRefPubMed Nijhawan S, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Majid S, Jacobsen GR, Sedrak MF, Sandler BJ, Talamini MA, Horgan S (2013) NOTES transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy: the United States human experience. Surg Endosc 27(2):514–517CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23(7):1419–1427CrossRefPubMed Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23(7):1419–1427CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Haber GP, Autorino R, Laydner H, Yang B, White MA, Hillyer S, Altunrende F, Khanna R, Spana G, Wahib I, Fareed K, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2012) SPIDER surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application. Eur Urol 61(2):415–422CrossRefPubMed Haber GP, Autorino R, Laydner H, Yang B, White MA, Hillyer S, Altunrende F, Khanna R, Spana G, Wahib I, Fareed K, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2012) SPIDER surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application. Eur Urol 61(2):415–422CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tranchart H, Ketoff S, Lainas P, Pourcher G, Di Giuro G, Tzanis D, Ferretti S, Dautruche A, Devaquet N, Dagher I (2013) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for what benefit? HPB (Oxford) 15(6):433–438CrossRef Tranchart H, Ketoff S, Lainas P, Pourcher G, Di Giuro G, Tzanis D, Ferretti S, Dautruche A, Devaquet N, Dagher I (2013) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for what benefit? HPB (Oxford) 15(6):433–438CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Allemann P, Demartines N, Schäfer M (2014) Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 20(3):843–851PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Allemann P, Demartines N, Schäfer M (2014) Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 20(3):843–851PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Broderick RC, Omelanczuk P, Harnsberger CR, Fuchs HF, Berducci M, Nefa J, Nicolia J, Almadani M, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Horgan S (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel single-incision surgical platform through a standard 15 mm trocar: initial experience and technical details. Surg Endosc 29(5):1250–1256CrossRefPubMed Broderick RC, Omelanczuk P, Harnsberger CR, Fuchs HF, Berducci M, Nefa J, Nicolia J, Almadani M, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Horgan S (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel single-incision surgical platform through a standard 15 mm trocar: initial experience and technical details. Surg Endosc 29(5):1250–1256CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen KH, Chen LR, Seow KM (2015) Ovarian suspension with adjustable sutures: an easy and helpful technique for facilitating laparoendoscopic single site gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.02.018 Chen KH, Chen LR, Seow KM (2015) Ovarian suspension with adjustable sutures: an easy and helpful technique for facilitating laparoendoscopic single site gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jmig.​2015.​02.​018
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner MJ, Kern H, Hapfelmeier A, Mehler J, Schoenberg MH (2013) Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients. World J Surg 37(5):991–998CrossRefPubMed Wagner MJ, Kern H, Hapfelmeier A, Mehler J, Schoenberg MH (2013) Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients. World J Surg 37(5):991–998CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101–125PubMed Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101–125PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Noel P, Nedelcu M, Gagner M (2014) SPIDER® sleeve gastrectomy—a new concept in single-trocar bariatric surgery: initial experience and technical details. J Visc Surg 151(2):91–96CrossRefPubMed Noel P, Nedelcu M, Gagner M (2014) SPIDER® sleeve gastrectomy—a new concept in single-trocar bariatric surgery: initial experience and technical details. J Visc Surg 151(2):91–96CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Oehlenschläger J, Rosenberg J, Helgstrand F, Jørgensen LN, Bardram L, Bisgaard T (2015) No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4066-4 PubMed Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Oehlenschläger J, Rosenberg J, Helgstrand F, Jørgensen LN, Bardram L, Bisgaard T (2015) No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4066-4 PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SK, Wang YL, Shen L, Iyer SG, Madhavan K (2015) A randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 39(4):897–904CrossRefPubMed Chang SK, Wang YL, Shen L, Iyer SG, Madhavan K (2015) A randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 39(4):897–904CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2014) Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy. World J Surg 38(1):25–32CrossRefPubMed Van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2014) Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy. World J Surg 38(1):25–32CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Meillat H, Birnbaum DJ, Fara R, Mancini J, Berdah S, Bège T (2015) Do height and weight affect the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Surg Endosc Meillat H, Birnbaum DJ, Fara R, Mancini J, Berdah S, Bège T (2015) Do height and weight affect the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Surg Endosc
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 24(10):2368–2386CrossRefPubMed Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 24(10):2368–2386CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, Jacobsen GR, Talamini MA, Horgan S, Ramamoorthy SL (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am J Surg 208(3):372–381CrossRefPubMed McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, Jacobsen GR, Talamini MA, Horgan S, Ramamoorthy SL (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am J Surg 208(3):372–381CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Varga G, Schulz T, Reinisch A, Josipovic N (2013) Transanal hybrid colon resection: from laparoscopy to NOTES. Surg Endosc 27(3):746–752CrossRefPubMed Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Varga G, Schulz T, Reinisch A, Josipovic N (2013) Transanal hybrid colon resection: from laparoscopy to NOTES. Surg Endosc 27(3):746–752CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D, Han KS, Lauwers GY, Sahani DV, Sbeih MA, Lacy AM, Rattner DW (2013) A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(9):3396–3405CrossRefPubMed Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D, Han KS, Lauwers GY, Sahani DV, Sbeih MA, Lacy AM, Rattner DW (2013) A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(9):3396–3405CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Phase II clinical experience and long-term follow-up using the next-generation single-incision platform FMX314
verfasst von
Martin Berducci
Hans F. Fuchs
Pablo Omelanczuk
Ryan C. Broderick
Cristina R. Harnsberger
Joshua Langert
Jorge Nefa
Pablo Jaureguiberry
Pablo Gomez
Laura Miranda
Garth R. Jacobsen
Bryan J. Sandler
Santiago Horgan
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4319-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.