Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016

01.04.2016

EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts offers similar success and complications compared to surgical treatment but with a lower cost

verfasst von: Angela Saul, Miguel Angel Ramirez Luna, Carlos Chan, Luis Uscanga, Francisco Valdovinos Andraca, Jorge Hernandez Calleros, Javier Elizondo, Felix Tellez Avila

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aim

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC) are a complication that occurs in acute and chronic pancreatitis. They comprise 75 % of cystic lesions of the pancreas. There are scarce data about surgical versus endoscopic treatment on PPC. The aim of this study was to compare both treatment modalities regarding clinical success, complication rate, recurrence, hospital stay and cost.

Methods

Retrospectively, data obtained prospectively from 2000 to 2012 were analyzed. A PPC was defined as a fluid collection in the pancreatic or peripancreatic area that had a well-defined wall and contained no solid debris or recognizable parenchymal necrosis. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution or a decrease in size of the PPC to 2 cm or smaller.

Results

Overall, 64 procedures in 61 patients were included: 21 (33 %) cases were drained endoscopically guided by EUS and 43 (67 %) cases were drained surgically. The clinical success of the endoscopic group was 90.5 versus 90.7 % for the surgical group (P = 0.7), with a complication rate of 23.8 and 25.6 %, respectively (P = 0.8), and a mortality rate of 0 and 2.3 % for each group, respectively (P = 0.4). The hospital stay was lower for the endoscopic group: 0 (0–10) days compared with 7 (2–42) days in the surgical group (P < 0.0001). Likewise, the cost was lower in the endoscopic group (P < 0.001). The recurrence rate was similar in both groups: 9.5 and 4.5 % respectively (P = 0.59). The two recurrences found in the endoscopic group were associated with stent migration, and the recurrence in the surgical group was due to the type of surgery performed (open drainage).

Conclusion

Endoscopic treatment of PPC offers the same clinical success, recurrence, complication and mortality rate as surgical treatment but with a shorter hospital stay and lower costs.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley EL, Clements JL Jr, Gonzalez AC (1979) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management. Am J Surg 137:135–141CrossRefPubMed Bradley EL, Clements JL Jr, Gonzalez AC (1979) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management. Am J Surg 137:135–141CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Malley VP, Cannon JP, Postier RG (1985) Pancreatic pseudocysts: cause, therapy, and results. Am J Surg 150:680–682CrossRefPubMed O’Malley VP, Cannon JP, Postier RG (1985) Pancreatic pseudocysts: cause, therapy, and results. Am J Surg 150:680–682CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Aghdassi A, Mayerle J, Kraft M et al (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 36:105–112CrossRefPubMed Aghdassi A, Mayerle J, Kraft M et al (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 36:105–112CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Grace PA, Williamson RC (1993) Modern management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg 80:573–581CrossRefPubMed Grace PA, Williamson RC (1993) Modern management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg 80:573–581CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang LW, Li ZS, Li SD et al (2009) Prevalence and clinical features of chronic pancreatitis in China: a retrospective multicenter analysis over 10 years. Pancreas 38:248–254CrossRefPubMed Wang LW, Li ZS, Li SD et al (2009) Prevalence and clinical features of chronic pancreatitis in China: a retrospective multicenter analysis over 10 years. Pancreas 38:248–254CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson B, Nilsson E, Willner J et al (2006) Treatment and outcome in pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:751–756CrossRefPubMed Andersson B, Nilsson E, Willner J et al (2006) Treatment and outcome in pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:751–756CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vitas GJ, Sarr MG (1992) Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery 111:123–130PubMed Vitas GJ, Sarr MG (1992) Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery 111:123–130PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Bastidas JA, Lynch-Nyhan A et al (1990) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170:411–417PubMed Yeo CJ, Bastidas JA, Lynch-Nyhan A et al (1990) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170:411–417PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta R, Suvarna D, Sadasivan S et al (2004) Natural course of asymptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol 23:140–142PubMed Mehta R, Suvarna D, Sadasivan S et al (2004) Natural course of asymptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol 23:140–142PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Andren-Sandberg A, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocysts in the 21st century: Part II. Natural history. JOP 5:64–70PubMed Andren-Sandberg A, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocysts in the 21st century: Part II. Natural history. JOP 5:64–70PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandberg AA, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocyst in the 21st century. Part II: natural history. J Pancreas 5:64–70 Sandberg AA, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocyst in the 21st century. Part II: natural history. J Pancreas 5:64–70
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley EL (2014) The natural and unnatural history of pancreatic fluid collections associated with acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 59:908–910CrossRefPubMed Bradley EL (2014) The natural and unnatural history of pancreatic fluid collections associated with acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 59:908–910CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Latif S et al (2011) Management of pancreatic fluid collections: a changing of the guard from surgery to endoscopy. Am Surg 77:1650–1655PubMed Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Latif S et al (2011) Management of pancreatic fluid collections: a changing of the guard from surgery to endoscopy. Am Surg 77:1650–1655PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Bang J, Sutton B et al (2013) Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 145:583–590CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Bang J, Sutton B et al (2013) Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 145:583–590CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Aljarabah M, Ammori BJ (2007) Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. SurgEndosc 21:1936–1944 Aljarabah M, Ammori BJ (2007) Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. SurgEndosc 21:1936–1944
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson MD, Walsh RM, Henderson JM et al (2009) Surgical versus nonsurgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:586–590CrossRefPubMed Johnson MD, Walsh RM, Henderson JM et al (2009) Surgical versus nonsurgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:586–590CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Lopes TL, Wilcox CM et al (2008) EUS versus surgical cyst-gastrostomy for management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 68:649–655CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Lopes TL, Wilcox CM et al (2008) EUS versus surgical cyst-gastrostomy for management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 68:649–655CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Banks P, Bollen T, Dervenis C et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111CrossRefPubMed Banks P, Bollen T, Dervenis C et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Christein J, Tamhane A et al (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 68:1102–1111CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Christein J, Tamhane A et al (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 68:1102–1111CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Park D, Lee S, Moon S et al (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 41:842–848CrossRefPubMed Park D, Lee S, Moon S et al (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 41:842–848CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Noone TC, Tutuian R et al (2005) Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary stent. Gastrointest Endosc 61:568–575CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Noone TC, Tutuian R et al (2005) Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary stent. Gastrointest Endosc 61:568–575CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Devière J, Antaki F (2008) Disconnected pancreatic tail syndrome: a plea for multidisciplinarity. Gastrointest Endosc 67:680–682CrossRefPubMed Devière J, Antaki F (2008) Disconnected pancreatic tail syndrome: a plea for multidisciplinarity. Gastrointest Endosc 67:680–682CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Rana SS, Bhasin DK (2013) Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic duct leaks and disruptions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 23:863–892CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Rana SS, Bhasin DK (2013) Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic duct leaks and disruptions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 23:863–892CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbs C, Baron T (2005) Outcome following endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in outpatients. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:634–637CrossRefPubMed Gibbs C, Baron T (2005) Outcome following endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in outpatients. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:634–637CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dávila-Cervantes A, Gómez F, Chan C et al (2004) Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 18:1420–1426CrossRefPubMed Dávila-Cervantes A, Gómez F, Chan C et al (2004) Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 18:1420–1426CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes CV, Pesenti C, Bories E et al (2008) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Arq Gastroenterol 45:17–21PubMed Lopes CV, Pesenti C, Bories E et al (2008) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Arq Gastroenterol 45:17–21PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali MA et al (2007) Pancreatic-fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 65:609–619CrossRefPubMed Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali MA et al (2007) Pancreatic-fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 65:609–619CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Krüger M, Scneider AS, Manns MR et al (2006) Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts or abscess after an EUS-guided 1-step procedure for initial access. Gastrointest Endosc 63:409–416CrossRefPubMed Krüger M, Scneider AS, Manns MR et al (2006) Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts or abscess after an EUS-guided 1-step procedure for initial access. Gastrointest Endosc 63:409–416CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ (2003) Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:141–148CrossRefPubMed Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ (2003) Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:141–148CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rische S, Riecken B, Degenkolb J et al (2013) Transmural endoscopic necrosectomy of infected pancreatic necroses and drainage of infected pseudocysts: a tailored approach. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:231–240CrossRefPubMed Rische S, Riecken B, Degenkolb J et al (2013) Transmural endoscopic necrosectomy of infected pancreatic necroses and drainage of infected pseudocysts: a tailored approach. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:231–240CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Trevino J, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S (2010) Successful stenting in ductal disruption favorably impacts treatment outcomes in patients undergoing transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:526–531CrossRefPubMed Trevino J, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S (2010) Successful stenting in ductal disruption favorably impacts treatment outcomes in patients undergoing transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:526–531CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Phadnis MA et al (2011) Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2080–2088CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Phadnis MA et al (2011) Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2080–2088CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts offers similar success and complications compared to surgical treatment but with a lower cost
verfasst von
Angela Saul
Miguel Angel Ramirez Luna
Carlos Chan
Luis Uscanga
Francisco Valdovinos Andraca
Jorge Hernandez Calleros
Javier Elizondo
Felix Tellez Avila
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4351-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.