Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017

05.08.2016

Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires

verfasst von: Denny Yu, Cem Dural, Melissa M. B. Morrow, Liyun Yang, Justin W. Collins, Susan Hallbeck, Magnus Kjellman, Mikael Forsman

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The introduction of robotic technology has revolutionized radical prostatectomy surgery. However, the potential benefits of robotic techniques may have trade-offs in increased mental demand for the surgeon and the physical demand for the assisting surgeon. This study employed an innovative motion tracking tool along with validated workload questionnaire to assess the ergonomics and workload for both assisting and console surgeons intraoperatively.

Methods

Fifteen RARP cases were collected in this study. Cases were performed by 10 different participants, six primarily performed console tasks and four primarily performed assisting tasks. Participants had a median 12 (min—3, max—25) years of surgical experience. Both console and assisting surgeons performed robotic prostatectomy cases while wearing inertial measurement units (IMUs) that continuously track neck, shoulder, and torso motion without interfering with the sterile environment. Postoperatively, participants completed a workload questionnaire (SURG-TLX) and a body part discomfort questionnaire.

Results

Twenty-six questionnaires were completed from 13 assisting and 13 console surgeons over the 15 cases. Postoperative pain was reported highest for the right shoulder and neck. Mental demands were 41 % higher for surgeons at the console than assisting (p < 0.05), while physical demands were not significantly different. Assisting surgeons worked in demanding neck postures for 58 % of the procedure compared to 24 % for the console surgeon (p < 0.01). Surgeons at the console were primarily static and showed 2–5 times fewer movements than assisting surgeons (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Postures were more ergonomic during console tasks than when assisting by the bedside; however, the console may constrain postures leading to static loads that have been associated with musculoskeletal symptoms for the neck, torso, and shoulders. The IMU sensors were effective at quantifying ergonomics in robotic prostatectomies, and these methods and findings have broad applications to other robotic procedures.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Volz DS, Steineck G, Wiklund PN (2010) Surgery-related complications in 1253 Robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology 75(5):1092–1097. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.075 CrossRefPubMed Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Volz DS, Steineck G, Wiklund PN (2010) Surgery-related complications in 1253 Robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology 75(5):1092–1097. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2009.​09.​075 CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783. doi:10.1002/bjs.7269 CrossRefPubMed Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​7269 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, Shirley M, Vale L, Ramsay C, Pickard R (2013) Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK national health service. Eur Urol 64(3):361–369. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.040 CrossRefPubMed Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, Shirley M, Vale L, Ramsay C, Pickard R (2013) Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK national health service. Eur Urol 64(3):361–369. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2013.​02.​040 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg J-U, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045 CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg J-U, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2012.​05.​045 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Mottrie A, Patel VR (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Mottrie A, Patel VR (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Patel VR, Shariat SF, Tewari AK, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Rosen RC, Wilson TG (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):382–404. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047 CrossRefPubMed Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Patel VR, Shariat SF, Tewari AK, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Rosen RC, Wilson TG (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):382–404. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2012.​05.​047 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg J-U (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):431–452CrossRefPubMed Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg J-U (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):431–452CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F (2013) Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(7):917–925. doi:10.1002/bjs.9135 CrossRefPubMed Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F (2013) Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(7):917–925. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​9135 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Butturini G, Damoli I, Crepaz L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Daskalaki D, Esposito A, Cingarlini S, Salvia R, Bassi C (2015) A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 29(11):3163–3170. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-4043-3 CrossRefPubMed Butturini G, Damoli I, Crepaz L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Daskalaki D, Esposito A, Cingarlini S, Salvia R, Bassi C (2015) A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 29(11):3163–3170. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-014-4043-3 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagrodia A, Raman JD (2009) Ergonomic considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J Endourol 23(4):627–633CrossRefPubMed Bagrodia A, Raman JD (2009) Ergonomic considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J Endourol 23(4):627–633CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH, Kim Y, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH (2012) Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg 99(11):1554–1561. doi:10.1002/bjs.8887 CrossRefPubMed Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH, Kim Y, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH (2012) Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg 99(11):1554–1561. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​8887 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowndes BR, Hallbeck MS (2014) Overview of human factors and ergonomics in the OR, with an emphasis on minimally invasive surgeries. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 24(3):308–317. doi:10.1002/hfm.20383 CrossRef Lowndes BR, Hallbeck MS (2014) Overview of human factors and ergonomics in the OR, with an emphasis on minimally invasive surgeries. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 24(3):308–317. doi:10.​1002/​hfm.​20383 CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210(3):306–313CrossRefPubMed Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210(3):306–313CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Szeto GP, Ho P, Ting AC, Poon JT, Cheng SW, Tsang RC (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehabil 19(2):175–184CrossRefPubMed Szeto GP, Ho P, Ting AC, Poon JT, Cheng SW, Tsang RC (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehabil 19(2):175–184CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, van Veelen MA, Pierie JPEN (2008) Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22(11):2421–2427. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0042-6 CrossRefPubMed van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, van Veelen MA, Pierie JPEN (2008) Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22(11):2421–2427. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-008-0042-6 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller K, Benden M, Pickens A, Shipp E, Zheng Q (2012) Ergonomics principles associated with laparoscopic surgeon injury/illness. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 54(6):1087–1092CrossRef Miller K, Benden M, Pickens A, Shipp E, Zheng Q (2012) Ergonomics principles associated with laparoscopic surgeon injury/illness. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 54(6):1087–1092CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu D, Lowndes B, Morrow M, Kaufman K, Bingener J, Hallbeck S (2015) Impact of novel shift handle laparoscopic tool on wrist ergonomics and task performance. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4634-7 Yu D, Lowndes B, Morrow M, Kaufman K, Bingener J, Hallbeck S (2015) Impact of novel shift handle laparoscopic tool on wrist ergonomics and task performance. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4634-7
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24(2):377–382CrossRefPubMed Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24(2):377–382CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92CrossRefPubMed Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee GI, Lee MR, Clanton T, Sutton E, Park AE, Marohn MR (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28(2):456–465CrossRefPubMed Lee GI, Lee MR, Clanton T, Sutton E, Park AE, Marohn MR (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28(2):456–465CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, Meyer JP, Felblinger J, Hubert J (2013) Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9(2):142–147. doi:10.1002/rcs.1489 CrossRef Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, Meyer JP, Felblinger J, Hubert J (2013) Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9(2):142–147. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1489 CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Craven R, Franasiak J, Mosaly P, Gehrig PA (2013) Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(5):648–655CrossRefPubMed Craven R, Franasiak J, Mosaly P, Gehrig PA (2013) Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(5):648–655CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Trejo A, Doné K, DiMartino A, Oleynikov D, Hallbeck M (2006) Articulating vs. conventional laparoscopic grasping tools—surgeons’ opinions. Int J Ind Ergon 36(1):25–35CrossRef Trejo A, Doné K, DiMartino A, Oleynikov D, Hallbeck M (2006) Articulating vs. conventional laparoscopic grasping tools—surgeons’ opinions. Int J Ind Ergon 36(1):25–35CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Beurskens AJ, Bültmann U, Kant I, Vercoulen JH, Bleijenberg G, Swaen GM (2000) Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure. Occup Environ Med 57(5):353–357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beurskens AJ, Bültmann U, Kant I, Vercoulen JH, Bleijenberg G, Swaen GM (2000) Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure. Occup Environ Med 57(5):353–357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113CrossRefPubMed Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelrahman A, Bingener J, Yu D, Lowndes B, Mohamed A, McConico A, Hallbeck MS (2015) Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4332-5 PubMedPubMedCentral Abdelrahman A, Bingener J, Yu D, Lowndes B, Mohamed A, McConico A, Hallbeck MS (2015) Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4332-5 PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fantozzi S, Giovanardi A, Magalhães FA, Di Michele R, Cortesi M, Gatta G (2015) Assessment of three-dimensional joint kinematics of the upper limb during simulated swimming using wearable inertial-magnetic measurement units. J Sports Sci. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1088659 Fantozzi S, Giovanardi A, Magalhães FA, Di Michele R, Cortesi M, Gatta G (2015) Assessment of three-dimensional joint kinematics of the upper limb during simulated swimming using wearable inertial-magnetic measurement units. J Sports Sci. doi:10.​1080/​02640414.​2015.​1088659
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson A, Hilbert A, Bertrand P, McFarland S, Newman D (2014) In-suit sensor systems for characterizing human-space suit interaction. In: 44th International conference on environmental systems Anderson A, Hilbert A, Bertrand P, McFarland S, Newman D (2014) In-suit sensor systems for characterizing human-space suit interaction. In: 44th International conference on environmental systems
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen RG, Gurfinkel VS, Kwak E, Warden AC, Horak FB (2015) Lighten up specific postural instructions affect axial rigidity and step initiation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29(9):878–888CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cohen RG, Gurfinkel VS, Kwak E, Warden AC, Horak FB (2015) Lighten up specific postural instructions affect axial rigidity and step initiation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29(9):878–888CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Horak F, King L, Mancini M (2015) Role of body-worn movement monitor technology for balance and gait rehabilitation. Phys Ther 95(3):461–470CrossRefPubMed Horak F, King L, Mancini M (2015) Role of body-worn movement monitor technology for balance and gait rehabilitation. Phys Ther 95(3):461–470CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart SG, NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 2006. Sage Publications, pp 904–908 Hart SG, NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 2006. Sage Publications, pp 904–908
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow MM, Hurd WJ, Kaufman KR, An K-N (2010) Shoulder demands in manual wheelchair users across a spectrum of activities. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20(1):61–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morrow MM, Hurd WJ, Kaufman KR, An K-N (2010) Shoulder demands in manual wheelchair users across a spectrum of activities. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20(1):61–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat McAtamney L, Corlett EN (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24(2):91–99CrossRefPubMed McAtamney L, Corlett EN (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24(2):91–99CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Szeto GP, Cheng SW, Poon JT, Ting AC, Tsang RC, Ho P (2012) Surgeons’ static posture and movement repetitions in open and laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 172(1):e19–e31CrossRefPubMed Szeto GP, Cheng SW, Poon JT, Ting AC, Tsang RC, Ho P (2012) Surgeons’ static posture and movement repetitions in open and laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 172(1):e19–e31CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Plerhoples TA, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wren SM (2012) The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 6(1):65–72CrossRefPubMed Plerhoples TA, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wren SM (2012) The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 6(1):65–72CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) publication no 97-141. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) publication no 97-141. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati
49.
50.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Descatha A, Dale AM, Silverstein BA, Roquelaure Y, Rempel D (2015) Lateral epicondylitis: new evidence for work relatedness. Joint Bone Spine 82(1):5–7CrossRefPubMed Descatha A, Dale AM, Silverstein BA, Roquelaure Y, Rempel D (2015) Lateral epicondylitis: new evidence for work relatedness. Joint Bone Spine 82(1):5–7CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan ZJ, Harris-Adamson C, Gerr F, Eisen EA, Hegmann KT, Bao S, Silverstein B, Evanoff B, Dale AM, Thiese MS (2015) Associations between workplace factors and carpal tunnel syndrome: a multi-site cross sectional study. Am J Ind Med 58(5):509–518CrossRefPubMed Fan ZJ, Harris-Adamson C, Gerr F, Eisen EA, Hegmann KT, Bao S, Silverstein B, Evanoff B, Dale AM, Thiese MS (2015) Associations between workplace factors and carpal tunnel syndrome: a multi-site cross sectional study. Am J Ind Med 58(5):509–518CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires
verfasst von
Denny Yu
Cem Dural
Melissa M. B. Morrow
Liyun Yang
Justin W. Collins
Susan Hallbeck
Magnus Kjellman
Mikael Forsman
Publikationsdatum
05.08.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5047-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.