Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2017

04.10.2016

Training residents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is supervised surgery safe?

verfasst von: H. W. Nijhof, R. Silvis, R. C. L. M. Vuylsteke, S. J. Oosterling, H. Rijna, H. B. A. C. Stockmann

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Colorectal resections are increasingly performed laparoscopically, and training in laparoscopic resections in the Netherlands has shifted from a post-residency fellowship to training in residency. The question remains if this supervised surgery affects short-term patient outcome.

Methods

Between January 2010 and July 2014, 523 consecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection, were selected from a prospective single-center database. All data were obtained from the maintained database and retrospectively analyzed. We compared the short-term outcome of patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery by a supervised fifth- or sixth-year resident compared to patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed by a dedicated colorectal surgeon. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the t test for continuous variables.

Results

Almost 40 % of operations were performed by a resident with an even distribution in type of resection, except for the abdominal–perineal resection (residents vs. surgeon 3.57 vs. 8.26 %, p = 0.04) and the total number of patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiation (resident vs. surgeon 6.66 vs. 20.65 %, p = 0.04). No difference was found in operative time or per-operative blood loss. A higher conversion rate was found when surgery was performed by a supervised resident (residents vs. surgeon 17.34 vs. 9.17 %, p = 0.01), which could be attributed to case selection and one single year. No differences in major complications, oncological outcome and construction of a stoma were found. In the case of minor complications, a significantly increased percentage of bladder retention was found in the surgeon group (residents vs. surgeon 1 vs. 4.6 %, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

In this study, we found that patient safety and short-term outcome are not adversely affected when laparoscopic colorectal surgery is performed by a supervised fifth- or sixth-year resident.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Pigué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Pigué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Enl J Med 350:2050–22059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Enl J Med 350:2050–22059CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341(8843):457–460CrossRefPubMed MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341(8843):457–460CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1997) Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA 277:925–926CrossRef World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1997) Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA 277:925–926CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Fukuda M, Murakami T, Okuchi Y, Hata H, Sakai Y, Ikai I (2012) Laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer performed by trainees: impact on short-term outcomes and selection of suitable patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(9):1215–1222CrossRefPubMed Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Fukuda M, Murakami T, Okuchi Y, Hata H, Sakai Y, Ikai I (2012) Laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer performed by trainees: impact on short-term outcomes and selection of suitable patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(9):1215–1222CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pastor C, Cienfuegos J, Baixauli J, Arredondo J, Sola J, Beorlegui C, Hernandez-Lizoain J (2013) Surgical training on rectal cancer surgery: do supervised senior residents differ from consultants in outcomes? Int J Colorectal Dis 28:671–677CrossRefPubMed Pastor C, Cienfuegos J, Baixauli J, Arredondo J, Sola J, Beorlegui C, Hernandez-Lizoain J (2013) Surgical training on rectal cancer surgery: do supervised senior residents differ from consultants in outcomes? Int J Colorectal Dis 28:671–677CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Maslekar S, Sharma A, Macdonald A, Gunn J, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2006) Do supervised colorectal trainees differ from consultants in terms of quality of TME surgery? Colorectal Dis 8(9):790–794CrossRefPubMed Maslekar S, Sharma A, Macdonald A, Gunn J, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2006) Do supervised colorectal trainees differ from consultants in terms of quality of TME surgery? Colorectal Dis 8(9):790–794CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stein S, Stulberg J, Champagne B (2012) Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing. Surg Endosc 26:488–492CrossRefPubMed Stein S, Stulberg J, Champagne B (2012) Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing. Surg Endosc 26:488–492CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Training residents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is supervised surgery safe?
verfasst von
H. W. Nijhof
R. Silvis
R. C. L. M. Vuylsteke
S. J. Oosterling
H. Rijna
H. B. A. C. Stockmann
Publikationsdatum
04.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5268-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.