Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2017

04.11.2016

Presence of a fellowship improves perioperative outcomes following hepatopancreatobiliary procedures

verfasst von: Maria S. Altieri, Jie Yang, Donglei Yin, Catherine Frenkel, Mark Talamini, Dana A. Telem, Aurora Pryor

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

There is an increase in subspecialization and in the number of surgeons seeking fellowship training in the USA. Little is known regarding the effect of hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) fellowship programs’ status of an institution on perioperative outcomes. This study aims to examine the effect of such status on perioperative outcomes across all institutions following complex surgeries involving HPB procedures in the State of New York (NYS).

Methods

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System administrative database was used to identify several complex surgeries involving the pancreas, liver, and gallbladder by using ICD-9 codes for inpatient procedures between 2012 and 2014. Procedures were compared in terms of 30-day readmission, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and major complications between institutions with and without fellowship. Linear mixed model and generalized linear mixed models were used to compare the differences.

Results

There were 4156 procedures identified during 2012–2014 in NYS. Among these, 1685 (40.5%) were pancreatic surgeries only, 1031 (24.8%) were liver surgeries only, 1288 (31.0%) were gallbladder surgeries only, 11 (0.3%) were both pancreatic and liver surgeries, 124 (3.0%) were both liver and gallbladder, and 17 (0.4%) were both pancreatic and gallbladder. Elderly patients tended to go to the hospitals with HPB fellowship. Following multivariable regression and controlling for other factors, hospitals with fellowships remained significantly associated with less severe complications (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29–0.83, p = 0.0075). No significant differences were seen between hospitals with and without fellowship in terms of 30-day readmissions (p = 0.6) and HLOS (p = 0.4).

Conclusion

Institutions offering HPB fellowship training were associated with significantly improved rate of complications, although there was no significant difference in terms of 30-day readmission rate or HLOS. This data highlight the importance of a presence of a fellowship in complex hepatopancreatobiliary procedures.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301(25):1364–1369CrossRefPubMed Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301(25):1364–1369CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Telem DA, Talamini M, Altieri M, Yang J, Zhang Q, Pryor AD (2015) The effect of national hospital accreditation in bariatric surgery on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(4):749–757CrossRefPubMed Telem DA, Talamini M, Altieri M, Yang J, Zhang Q, Pryor AD (2015) The effect of national hospital accreditation in bariatric surgery on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(4):749–757CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Monson JR, Probst CP, Wexner SD et al (2014) Consortium for optimizing the treatment of rectal cancer(OSTRiCh). Failure of evidence-based cancer care in the United States: the association between rectal cancer treatment, cancer center volume, and geography. Ann Surg 260(4):625–631CrossRefPubMed Monson JR, Probst CP, Wexner SD et al (2014) Consortium for optimizing the treatment of rectal cancer(OSTRiCh). Failure of evidence-based cancer care in the United States: the association between rectal cancer treatment, cancer center volume, and geography. Ann Surg 260(4):625–631CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer NJ, Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Hillner BE, Birkmeyer JD (2005) Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer 103(3):435–441CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer NJ, Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Hillner BE, Birkmeyer JD (2005) Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer 103(3):435–441CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Surgical specialization and operative mortality in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 12(9):1534–1539CrossRefPubMed Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Surgical specialization and operative mortality in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 12(9):1534–1539CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL (1998) Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 228(3):429–438CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL (1998) Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 228(3):429–438CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeyarajah DR, Patel S, Osman H (2015) The current state of hepatopancreatobiliary fellowship experience in North America. J Surg Educ 72(1):144–147CrossRefPubMed Jeyarajah DR, Patel S, Osman H (2015) The current state of hepatopancreatobiliary fellowship experience in North America. J Surg Educ 72(1):144–147CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T (2006) One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg 244(2):240–247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T (2006) One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg 244(2):240–247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz GS, Swan RZ, Ruangvoravat L, Attiyeh FF (2011) Morbidity and mortality after hepatic and pancreatic resections: results from one surgeon at a low-volume urban hospital over thirty years. Am J Sur 201(4):438–444CrossRef Schwartz GS, Swan RZ, Ruangvoravat L, Attiyeh FF (2011) Morbidity and mortality after hepatic and pancreatic resections: results from one surgeon at a low-volume urban hospital over thirty years. Am J Sur 201(4):438–444CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Li G, Baek NH, Hwang JC, Hong J, Yoo BM, Kim WH (2013) Surgical outcomes of distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 60(126):1263–1267PubMed Kim JH, Li G, Baek NH, Hwang JC, Hong J, Yoo BM, Kim WH (2013) Surgical outcomes of distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 60(126):1263–1267PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyder O, Sachs T, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Pawlik TM (2013) Impact of hospital teaching status on length of stay and mortality among patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg 17(12):2114–2122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hyder O, Sachs T, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Pawlik TM (2013) Impact of hospital teaching status on length of stay and mortality among patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg 17(12):2114–2122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Derogar M, Blomberg J, Sadr-Azodi O (2015) Hospital teaching status and volume related to mortality after pancreatic cancer surgery in a national cohort. Br J Surg 102(5):548–557CrossRefPubMed Derogar M, Blomberg J, Sadr-Azodi O (2015) Hospital teaching status and volume related to mortality after pancreatic cancer surgery in a national cohort. Br J Surg 102(5):548–557CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Colletti LM, Upchurch GR Jr (2004) Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Arch Surg 139(2):137–141CrossRefPubMed Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Colletti LM, Upchurch GR Jr (2004) Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Arch Surg 139(2):137–141CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Howard TJ, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145(7):634–640CrossRefPubMed Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Howard TJ, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145(7):634–640CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu CC, Chiu CC, Wang JJ et al (2014) Volume-Outcome Associations after Major Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Nationwide Taiwan Study. J Gastroint Surg 18(6):1138–1145CrossRef Lu CC, Chiu CC, Wang JJ et al (2014) Volume-Outcome Associations after Major Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Nationwide Taiwan Study. J Gastroint Surg 18(6):1138–1145CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohn GP, Nikfarjam M (2010) The effect of surgical volume and the provision of residency and fellowship training on complications of major hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 14(12):1981–1989CrossRefPubMed Kohn GP, Nikfarjam M (2010) The effect of surgical volume and the provision of residency and fellowship training on complications of major hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 14(12):1981–1989CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhayani NH, Hamed OH, Gupta A et al (2013) Do patients outcomes suffer when surgical fellows are involved in hepatic resection? Surg 154(5):1024–1030CrossRef Bhayani NH, Hamed OH, Gupta A et al (2013) Do patients outcomes suffer when surgical fellows are involved in hepatic resection? Surg 154(5):1024–1030CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Presence of a fellowship improves perioperative outcomes following hepatopancreatobiliary procedures
verfasst von
Maria S. Altieri
Jie Yang
Donglei Yin
Catherine Frenkel
Mark Talamini
Dana A. Telem
Aurora Pryor
Publikationsdatum
04.11.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5306-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.