Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2017

07.03.2017

Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis

verfasst von: Manfred Odermatt, Jamil Ahmed, Sofoklis Panteleimonitis, Jim Khan, Amjad Parvaiz

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The learning curve for robotic colorectal surgery is ill-defined. This study aimed to investigate the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic rectal surgeons when starting with robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) using cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts.

Methods

This retrospective case series analysed patients who underwent curative and elective laparoscopic or robotic TMEs for rectal cancer performed by two surgeons. The first consecutive robotic TME cases of each surgeon were 1:1 propensity score matched to their laparoscopic TME cases using age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, T stage (AJCC) and tumour location height. The matched laparoscopic cases defined individual standards for the quality indicators: operating time, R stage, lymph node harvest, length of hospital stay and major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade 3–5). Deviation of more than a quarter of a standard deviation from the mean for the continuous indicators, or exceeding the observed risk for the binary indicators was defined as off-target with an upward inflection in the CUSUM curve.

Results

From 2006 to 2015, 384 (294 laparoscopic; 90 robotic) TMEs met the inclusion criteria. Surgeon A performed 206 (70.1%) of the laparoscopic and 43 (47.8%) of the robotic cases. Surgeon B performed 88 (29.9%) of the laparoscopic and 47 (52.2%) of the robotic cases. After matching, no covariate exhibited an absolute standardised mean difference >0.25. For surgeon A, the CUSUM curves showed no apparent learning process compared to his laparoscopic standards. For surgeon B, a learning process for operation time, lymph node harvest and major complications was demonstrated by an initial upward inflection of the CUSUM curves; after 15 cases, all quality indicators were generally on target.

Conclusions

For experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons, the formal learning process for robotic TME may be short to reach a similar performance level as obtained in conventional laparoscopy.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Feroci F, Vannucchi A, Bianchi PP, Cantafio S, Garzi A, Formisano G, Scatizzi M (2016) Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 22:3602–3610CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Feroci F, Vannucchi A, Bianchi PP, Cantafio S, Garzi A, Formisano G, Scatizzi M (2016) Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 22:3602–3610CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1887–1895CrossRefPubMed D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1887–1895CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894CrossRefPubMed Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Araujo SE, Seid VE, Klajner S (2014) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 20:14359–14370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Araujo SE, Seid VE, Klajner S (2014) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 20:14359–14370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang M, Kang X, Wang H, Guan W (2014) A meta-analysis on the outcomes and potential benefits of hybrid robotic technique in rectal cancer surgery. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 17:785–790PubMed Wang M, Kang X, Wang H, Guan W (2014) A meta-analysis on the outcomes and potential benefits of hybrid robotic technique in rectal cancer surgery. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 17:785–790PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14:e134–e156CrossRefPubMed Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14:e134–e156CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edlin R, Garbett C, Guillou P, Holloway I, Howard H, Marshall H, McCabe C, Pavitt S, Quirke P, Rivers CS, Brown JM (2012) An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:233–241CrossRefPubMed Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edlin R, Garbett C, Guillou P, Holloway I, Howard H, Marshall H, McCabe C, Pavitt S, Quirke P, Rivers CS, Brown JM (2012) An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:233–241CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, Tomioka H, Mori K (2015) Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679–1685CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, Tomioka H, Mori K (2015) Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679–1685CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed J, Kuzu MA, Figueiredo N, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2016) Three-step standardized approach for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during robotic rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 18:O171–O174CrossRefPubMed Ahmed J, Kuzu MA, Figueiredo N, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2016) Three-step standardized approach for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during robotic rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 18:O171–O174CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12:433–438CrossRefPubMed Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12:433–438CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kestin IG (1995) A statistical approach to measuring the competence of anaesthetic trainees at practical procedures. Br J Anaesth 75:805–809CrossRefPubMed Kestin IG (1995) A statistical approach to measuring the competence of anaesthetic trainees at practical procedures. Br J Anaesth 75:805–809CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Montgomery DC (2009) Introduction to statistical quality control, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken Montgomery DC (2009) Introduction to statistical quality control, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
17.
Zurück zum Zitat R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 42:28CrossRef Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 42:28CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowers J, Fredrickson M, Hansen B (2010) RItools: Randomization Inference Tools. pp R package Bowers J, Fredrickson M, Hansen B (2010) RItools: Randomization Inference Tools. pp R package
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) cem: Sorftware for Coarsened Exact Matching. pp R package Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) cem: Sorftware for Coarsened Exact Matching. pp R package
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Colquhoun PH (2008) CUSUM analysis of J-pouch surgery reflects no learning curve after board certification. Can J Surg 51:296–299PubMedPubMedCentral Colquhoun PH (2008) CUSUM analysis of J-pouch surgery reflects no learning curve after board certification. Can J Surg 51:296–299PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Biau DJ, Resche-Rigon M, Godiris-Petit G, Nizard RS, Porcher R (2007) Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM. Qual Saf Health Care 16:203–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biau DJ, Resche-Rigon M, Godiris-Petit G, Nizard RS, Porcher R (2007) Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM. Qual Saf Health Care 16:203–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowles TA, Watters DA (2007) Time to CUSUM: simplified reporting of outcomes in colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 77:587–591CrossRefPubMed Bowles TA, Watters DA (2007) Time to CUSUM: simplified reporting of outcomes in colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 77:587–591CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Trinh BB, Jackson NR, Hauch AT, Hu T, Kandil E (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 18:3 Trinh BB, Jackson NR, Hauch AT, Hu T, Kandil E (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 18:3
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung AK, Aly EH (2013) Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 56:786–796CrossRefPubMed Fung AK, Aly EH (2013) Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 56:786–796CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat de Jesus JP, Valadao M, de Castro Araujo RO, Cesar D, Linhares E, Iglesias AC (2016) The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:808–812 de Jesus JP, Valadao M, de Castro Araujo RO, Cesar D, Linhares E, Iglesias AC (2016) The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:808–812
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter NN (2009) Is lymph node count an ideal quality indicator for cancer care? J Surg Oncol 99:265–268CrossRefPubMed Baxter NN (2009) Is lymph node count an ideal quality indicator for cancer care? J Surg Oncol 99:265–268CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Kulaylat M, Rockette H, Hassett J, Rajput A, Dunn KB, Dayton M (2009) Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer? Ann Surg 249:559–563CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Kulaylat M, Rockette H, Hassett J, Rajput A, Dunn KB, Dayton M (2009) Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer? Ann Surg 249:559–563CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper MA, Ibrahim A, Lyu H, Makary MA (2015) Underreporting of robotic surgery complications. J Healthc Qual 37:133–138CrossRefPubMed Cooper MA, Ibrahim A, Lyu H, Makary MA (2015) Underreporting of robotic surgery complications. J Healthc Qual 37:133–138CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMed Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis
verfasst von
Manfred Odermatt
Jamil Ahmed
Sofoklis Panteleimonitis
Jim Khan
Amjad Parvaiz
Publikationsdatum
07.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5453-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.